After a national search, the City of Greensboro has its next police chief – and he’s bringing with him decades of experience, a track record of reducing violent crime and a philosophy that leans heavily on community trust.
Greensboro City Manager Trey Davis announced this week that Kamran Afzal will take over as Greensboro’s new police chief, replacing John Thompson, who retired earlier this year. Afzal is scheduled to begin the job on May 13, 2026.
Afzal arrives with a long résumé that spans more than three decades in law enforcement, including leadership roles in Virginia, Colorado and, most recently, Dayton, Ohio.
According to the City of Greensboro’s press release announcing the hire, Afzal began his career with the US Capitol Police in 1991 before moving to the Arlington County Police Department, where he spent 24 years – including 12 years on the command staff.
That’s a whole lot of time learning the nuts and bolts of policing – from community engagement to special operations to the behind-the-scenes work that keeps a department running.
And that “behind-the-scenes” part turns out to be important.
Afzal has emphasized developing leadership from within departments – something he talked about in a recent interview on ABC 45 after taking the Greensboro job.
“I knew that I was the fourth consecutive chief from outside,” Afzal said, according to ABC 45. “Let’s develop people internally so they can compete for a position.”
That focus on building depth inside a department could matter in Greensboro, where long-term stability and leadership continuity have been ongoing concerns.
Afzal described how he rotates leadership within a department to give rising officers broader experience – something that he says prepares them for future leadership roles.
“We move people around to make sure that they’re exposed to different aspects of the organization,” Afzal said.
That kind of approach may sound like management jargon, but it gets at a real issue: whether a police department is building its next generation of leaders – or constantly starting over fresh.
Afzal’s career path also includes stints as police chief in Durango, Colorado, and Hopewell, Virginia, before he was selected in 2021 to lead the Dayton Police Department after a nationwide search.
A news report from Dayton at that time noted that officials were looking for someone who could lead reform efforts, strengthen community relationships and reduce crime – and they believed Afzal fit the bill.
That’s where his record starts to get particularly relevant for Greensboro.
In Dayton, Afzal pointed to measurable reductions in violent crime during his tenure.
In an interview earlier this year with a Dayton news outlet, Afzal said violent crime was down about 17 percent there compared to the previous year, and roughly 15 percent over a five-year average.
But his tone wasn’t celebratory.
“From my perspective, that means there’s still at least one person being victimized,” Afzal said in January. “There’s really not room to celebrate.”
That mindset – acknowledging progress but refusing to declare victory – may resonate in Greensboro, where crime issues, particularly downtown and in certain neighborhoods, remain a major concern.
Afzal also emphasized something that often gets overlooked in crime statistics: the importance of long-term trends over year-to-year fluctuations.
“Numbers can go up and numbers can go down year to year,” he said while in Dayton. “But you want to see, over a period of time, a decline.”
That kind of long-view thinking could be important in Greensboro, where debates over crime often focus on short-term spikes rather than sustained trends.
Another key piece of Afzal’s approach is staffing.
While in Dayton, he pointed to increased officer staffing levels as one factor contributing to reduced crime.
Having more officers on the street, he said, “brings the temperature down.”
That’s a simple way of putting it – but it reflects a broader philosophy that visible policing combined with strategic deployment can deter crime before it happens.
Afzal doesn’t stop at traditional policing: One of the most notable aspects of his approach is his emphasis on community cooperation.
“We can’t solve crimes on our own,” Afzal told a Dayton news outlet earlier this year. “That’s a very small percentage of crimes that we solve on our own – people who commit harm don’t call us.”
Instead, he stressed that solving crime depends heavily on relationships with residents – people who are willing to share information and work with law enforcement.
That’s a big deal for a city like Greensboro. Downtown concerns, homelessness issues, and crime in certain areas often intersect with broader community challenges – meaning that enforcement alone isn’t likely to solve the problems.
Afzal appears to understand that.
His career includes a strong emphasis on community policing, including initiatives aimed at building trust and encouraging public input for department policies.
While serving in Hopewell, Virginia, he made community input part of department policy and he worked to increase transparency according to City of Greensboro officials.
That kind of approach could play a role in Greensboro, where trust between law enforcement and parts of the community has been uneven at times.
Afzal has also shown an awareness of how crime patterns vary across a city.
In Dayton, he pushed back on the idea that any one area – such as downtown – should be the sole focus of policing efforts.
“Everything is a focus for us,” he said in that Dayton interview, noting that different areas require different strategies.
That’s another point that may carry over to Greensboro, where discussions about crime often center on downtown but extend to neighborhoods across the city.
Afzal’s background also includes experience with technology and modernization efforts. During his time in Arlington County, he helped implement in-car cameras, red light enforcement programs and other initiatives aimed at improving both safety and accountability for the department.
That mix of traditional policing with modern tools could shape how Greensboro approaches law enforcement going forward.
On a personal level, Afzal said his decision to come to Greensboro was both professional and personal.
In the ABC 45 interview this week, he noted that he already has connections to this area – including ties to the local Pakistani American community.
“I do love this place,” he told ABC 45.
That connection could matter more than it might seem at first glance.
Police chiefs aren’t just administrators – they’re public figures who have to navigate politics, community expectations and internal department culture.
Having roots, or at least connections, in the community may help ease that transition.
Afzal also acknowledged that his time in Greensboro may be limited – noting that, given his age, he likely has only a certain window left in his career.
That could cut both ways: On one hand, it might create urgency – a desire to make an impact quickly; on the other, it raises questions about long-term continuity and what happens after his tenure.
Still, Greensboro officials clearly believe they’ve found the right person for the job.
The city’s announcement highlighted Afzal’s experience in leadership, training and community engagement – as well as his educational background, which includes degrees in economics and public administration.
Greensboro, like many cities, is balancing multiple challenges – crime concerns, downtown issues, homelessness, and the need to build trust between police officers and members of the community.
Afzal’s track record suggests he will approach those challenges with a combination of data-driven strategy, community engagement and an emphasis on developing and elevating people within the department.

———–
He sounds good. i wish him luck.
– Welcome to Greensboro, ban chut ! [No offence. My buddies called each other that all the time ]
look @ that photo: he looks a little fuzzy to me !
no one eg. austin morris, got my ‘fuzz’ joke !
Hiring a Chief from outside the department generally hurts department morale. There are assistant Chiefs already in place that could have easily stepped into this role, and would have caused less stress for all of the officers. I’ve seen many times just how bad it is to hire leaders from outside when there are many qualified people ready to step up and accept the challenge. I doubt he will be here long, but it will take much longer for the department to heal from this really poor decision. I’ve always supported law enforcement and pray daily for the safety of every officer. I sincerely hope that this decision doesn’t tear the agency apart, but I have my doubts that despite his qualifications that he will be the real leader that GPD needs.
I think 4 out of the last 6 chiefs came from within the department. I didn’t see a lot of difference.
GPD had three consecutive inside chiefs. Wayne Scott Brian James and Jon Thompson. So what is this guy talking about.
The “development” of leadership is promoting as many DEI as possible. There is no development. So good luck. Also whether his ideas are good or bad command staff will be undermining him. Maybe he can make them work on Fridays.
Trey Davis saw a lot of good qualities in this man and felt he was the best candidate for the job. With this thought in mind, I would certainly wish this man well. The good men and women of the GPD and the citizens of Greensboro deserve another good chief, and I sincerely hope this man fits the bill.
Goodmorning!
My husband and I moved to Greensboro two years ago. We are from Ohio and know the Dayton,Ohio area well. I am excited to have a fellow Buckeye looking out for all of us in Greensboro. I’m certain with Afzal’s experience will serve our community well.
Do you think Greensboro has a city council that will support this chief or any chief? Guessing Greensboro is a good place to end a career and draw some nice benefits. Good luck Chief but I think another snafu from a new city council. Hope our long term officers understand or maybe they understand to well since they have seen this movie numerous times.
Having more officers on the street, he said, “brings the temperature down.”
That’s a simple way of putting it – but it reflects a broader philosophy that visible policing combined with strategic deployment can deter crime before it happens.
He looks good on paper ….time will telll
Well, we shall see how this plays out. One thing I have noticed in recent years is lack of driving enforcement. With all the speeding, reckless driving, running “yellow lights” I see, it would be nice to have some unmarked police cars get involved and get things under control. Last week while heading home during rush hour traffic on West Friendly, I so a motorcycle speeding, easily 15+ over the limit, weaving between lanes, passing cars and a few times, just drove between the cars on the dotted line. And Bryan Blvd is another place needing patrol.
Dayton’s crime rate is absurd, even by Greensboro standards. 1 in 17 citizens will be a victim of crime this year in Dayton vs. about 1 in 115 in Greensboro. This chief’s main accomplishment has been jumping from city to city every 2-3 years chasing another paycheck while dodging an ongoing investigation. This guy will be a failure on the scale of Robert White, which is ironic since both started their police careers and likely crossed paths in DC.
Robert White was not a failure. He got a lot of [deleted] to retire. Anybody want to wear a hat and 1980s pants again?
i will never wear pants again since becoming a nudist but i need to wear a hat for sun protection; tribal ? our old time religion had fun orgies – where are they now – banished by st platypus shinola in the 5th century ?
“Afzal also acknowledged that his time in Greensboro may be limited – noting that, given his age, he likely has only a certain window left in his career”.
I don’t understand why they just didn’t go ahead and find somebody that’s going to be here for years instead of someone that won’t. Then they’re going to have to do this all over again and that seems like a waste of time. I wish him the best while he’s in charge and I really hope he makes a lot of changes that the past Chief screwed up in regarding what he allowed his officers to do and more specifically what he told them not to do. I also hope he is not biased on behalf of the Pakistani community. Hopefully if they commit a crime, they will be punished just like the rest of us. I guess we will see. I have to wonder if he’s going to roll over for the city council and mayor like the sheriff and the way he rolls over for the County commissioners. That will be another wait and see I guess. Yes, I am looking at this differently from the rest of you. I just think it was a waste of time going through all this just to hire someone who will not be here that long. Especially considering that we have people already on our force who have been there for years and years and could have done the job. Especially since they know this town inside out and he doesn’t. I do however wish him well and I hope that he has a positive effect on Greensboro.
Practicing Shia or Sunni Islam Muslim?
I can find no publicly available information on whether he is Christian, atheist, Muslim, or any other religion.
————–
We don’t know his individual religious beliefs obviously, but Pakistan is almost 100% Musilm. That’s why it exists, after all (along with Bangladesh).
& indonesia
———-
Sunni. I just looked it up.
I don’t know about his religion but I do know one thing. The overt racism directed toward this man, especially in the News and Record, simply because Trey Davis selected a white person for the job rather than a black person is astonishing.
———–
His name is Kamran Afzal and he acknowledges links to the Pakistani-American community.
He’s obviously ethnically Asian, so why is he getting heat from the Left?
My God, Leftists are so prejudiced.
Says the bigot who referred to an entire class of people as pollution.
———–
Yeah – criminal terrorists.
————
And “Professor” – or whatever name you’re going by today – you are the most prejudiced, bigoted, and toxic commenter in these columns. By far.
And everyone knows it.
Hey. Hypo-Chris, or Professor Dummy, or whatever else you want to be called, don’t you group all Maga into one big negative basket? It’s just a few million people, but it’s ok when you do it. Hypocrite.
Don, I only point to actual policy, actions and positions of the MAGA movement.
Attacking a group for their stated political position is not bigotry. THAT is just political discourse in our modern society where identity politics is now the standard for many.
But you be you
Follow up question for you Don…
Do you consider it bigotry to refer to an entire population of people as pollution? Do you defend Austin’s (or what ever his real name is) statement?
Just curious if you are defending his statement or just deflecting?
——————–
Hey Chrissy ! Nobody else possesses an unhealthy fixation with me. It’s just you, you weird creep.
However, I’m rather flattered that you want to use my comments as talking points.
My take on things is often challenging and provocative, unlike your take on everything under the Sun, which is boring, trite and predictable – every single time.
Not defending him per se, since I don’t know what comment you are specifically referring to. Just calling out your Hypo-Chrissy. You can paint your hateful comments ever how you want but you have a bigoted view of the world, largely against white conservatives. The world isn’t against the black man. That is largely in your head because you feed yourself misinformation on YouTube and with left slanted AI machines (that’s been proven time and again). And that’s why you truly are Professor Dummy.
————
He’s become totally fixated with me Don, probably because I have continually humiliated him and proven him wrong so many times in these columns.
He now seems to believe that everything in these comment columns revolves around me.
Weird.
And creepy.
I have a political view against MAGA. Not a bigoted view. Big difference given MAGA is a choice of ideas where the hate Austin has is against people for what they look like, where they were born, and traditions with which they were raised.
But you be you. Call me what you like. I am called all kinds of names by MAGA, Conspiracy Theorists, Racists, Bigots and morons. The vast majority of names are just because I use facts, data, and valid sources to call BS to ignorance and hateful comments made by many conservatives here on the Rhino Times.
But back to the question,….his exact quote “…., why have we allowed his ilk, and millions like him, to pollute our dear old country?” This is in reference to immigrants in Britain. As usual, he points to one criminal action of one immigrant and uses that the disparage an entire group/class of people…..millions of people. The vast majority who are no criminals.
Is he bigoted for his comment and hatred of immigrants? Or are you just deflecting on his behalf.
Hate me if you like, but I can defend my labeling of Austin as a bigot and racist and I will continue to call him out for every bigoted and racist comment he makes here on the Rhino Times as I would hate for readers to believe RT supports such hate filled ignorance.
It’s not a political view when you demonize them, use hateful bigoted language like “I think it do it must be tru” to make them all sound dumb, etc. And you’re applying it against the millions of people who consider themselves MAGA, even black men, simply because they disagree with you. You are just being a bigot but not willing to admit it while hiding behind “it’s politics”. Whatever helps you sleep, Hypocrite.
Again, you have tossed me a quote out of context. From what I gather from his comments that I have read in context, Austin is a strong believer in the sovereignty of his homeland, and now America as well. When people come into a country but do not assimilate to the norms of said country, it causes issues. Sometimes those issues develop into criminal activity, which is exacerbated by their immigrant status. It makes the news, it’s often violent and far reaching, etc. So yeah, he appears to be fed up with it. He is not against immigrants, which he has said time and again, but you ignore. He is against ILLEGAL immigrants and CRIMINAL immigrants. I don’t see anything bigoted in that point of view. It’s no more bigoted than if you woke up and thirty people camping in your front yard. You would not want them there, because they would be there ILLEGALLY. Dummy.
The ‘I thunk it so it mus be troo’ is only used when someone replies to facts with Na Uh and then they just repeat their misinformation, conspiracy theory, etc… The republican party has promoted these types of individuals to cabinet level positions. Not to mention the folks here that use that take. It is an official republican platform to reject science so, yes, it is indeed political discourse. Not sure why you toss in race. People of color are just as capable of the “I thunk it so it mus be troo” approach to complex topics.
The immigrants he claims polluted Britain are very much legal. Amazing the twists and turns you take to justify calling immigrants pollutants yet get all bent out of shape about aggressive political discourse.
You are clearly just deflecting for poor little bigot buddy Austin (or whatever his real name is….) as there is no defense for referring to people as pollution just because they had to flee their country, seek better opportunities abroad, etc… Legally.
But you be you.
I do keep forgetting that you’re never wrong in your own mind. A true sign of lunacy and idiocy.
Austin is not anti-immigrant, no matter how hard you yell about it. He is an immigrant himself. So dumb.
———— * * *
“Professor” Chris is deliberately misinterpreting my words, so he can call me a bigot and a hater and a racist. It’s how he operates here, all the time. He likes to put other people down, so he can feel superior.
My remark characterized illegal immigrant terrorists as those whom we have allowed to pollute “our dear old county” (Great Britain). NOT immigrants – ILLEGAL TERRORIST IMMIGRANTS. Big difference.
And he doesn’t know what he’s talking about when he claims these migrants are legal. Yes, as soon as they get out of their dinghies on the beaches of Southern England, they utter the only English words they know : “Asylum Seeker!” This gives them instant legal protection, so you might try to argue that they are legal immigrants. It’s an absurd position to hold.
These people have zero regard for Britain or British laws, and they flop on our shores with only the shirt on their back, demanding to be fed, clothed, housed, etc…
If they are not illegal immigrants, who is?
And they bring nothing to the table. They are unskilled, uneducated, unintelligent, and crude, along with an inclination for criminality – like the 11 million Third World immigrants Biden invited to this country. The worst ones even commit acts of mass murder on innocent civilians. Are they polluting our countries?
Of course they are.
* * * *
PS
Here is another lie the Left – and “Professor” Chris – peddle.
He says they had to flee their country, as if their lives depended on it. But asylum laws require that genuine asylum seekers claim asylum in THE FIRST SAFE COUNTRY they reach. These people have traveled through a dozen safe countries, including France, before they cross the English Channel to reach the UK.
Let’s tell the truth. They want to live in England because they’ve heard how everything is free.
And when we immediately give them food, shelter in 4 star hotels, medical care, clothing, a cell phone and an allowance, they think they died and went to Heaven. And that’s why half the Third World wants to abandon what Trump calls their “shithole countries” to flop on our shores.
Persecution and/or asylum have nothing to do with it.
Austin tries to cha get his words when they are pointed out as clearly bigoted. He now claims he is only referring to ‘terrorists’ yet his statement was “…millions like him….”
By using the word millions he is clearly referring to all immigrants or he clearly sees the majority of immigrants as terrorists. But good try dodging Austin. Maybe we take this as a sign you regret your own words now that you are trying to deflect from them.
Don, good for you for defending your bigott buddy. To be clear, Austin only makes negative comments about immigrants of color. Since he is white, he sees himself as ‘a good immigrant’. I am willing to listen how millions of immigrants are terrorists given they commit crimes at a lower rate that natural born Brits.
Until you do that, I will continue to stand by my labeling of Austin.
Don, want to wade into his claim that some races are less evolved than others? Or you gonna claim that isn’t racist given it is the actual definition of racism. Or we can dive into his chsracteration of LGBTQ as deviants as if use of that word isn’t intended as an insult.
I am happy to admit I am wrong when I make a mistake, but Austin’s words are his words and the meanings clear, no matter how you and he try to spin it now that he is called out.
But you be you.
Dummy Don says I never admit I am wrong. I actually have a few times ….Austin then labeled me a liar for admitting a mistake…but what ever. But Don l, how many times in our exchanges have you admitted YOU were wrong?Hmmmm…..same number of times I have admitted to being wrong in our exchanges. Maybe YOU need to check YOUR bias and media sources. Hypo?
Fyi, I don’t get my news from social media
…including youtube. I mostly read the NYTimes and WSJ. Or, I think for myself snd research topics by reading the actual science, studies, data etc….
But you be you. (Note the guy you are defending prefers his personal observations over actual data and studies……his biased personal observations…..)
Happy to discuss. But let’s drop the childish name calling of each other. Will continue if you like but really is childish of us. I just give as I reveive.
Since Austin doesn’t actually care about facts i will provide actual fact on international asylum law.
Under international law (specifically the 1951 Refugee Convention), there is no explicit requirement for a person to claim asylum in the first safe country they encounter. However, UK domestic law has increasingly aimed to enforce this principle through “inadmissibility” rules.
Meaning, if UK grants asylum, yes, they are legal immigrants not matter what lies Austin tells you.
————-
I couldn’t care less about your verbal abuse of me, you little wanker. Being attacked by you is like being mauled by a dead sheep.
And you need to look up the word “ilk” because you obviously don’t understand it . Or maybe you do, but in your eagerness to launch vile ad hominem attacks against me, you just chose to overlook it.
Everyone can see that you’re not interested in actually debating immigration – you’re just here to throw mud at others.
What an odious little man you are.
we expect u to spy on him & report back here. chop chop
sufi ? whirling dervish ? make u nervous ? good. has he cut off any foreskins or clitoris’s lately ? does he have a tattoo of hitler or taylor swift on his butt ?
Looking at the photo……it’s 007!
Interesting choice by Trey Davis to select him over Deputy Chief Mardis who had the full support of GPD. Right on the heels of a wrongful termination of a GPD officer. I think it’s safe to say that Trey Davis and Deputy Chief Ric Alston are the two most hated people in recent GPD history, at least going back to the Hinson era. Morale could not be lower at GPD, which always means the community is going to be the ones most impacted.
Trey Davis won’t be able to rectify this one. He has lost the support of GPD entirely.
I have no opinion about the results this police chief may achieve. However, I do believe it is odd for an individual to search for lateral positions so many times in the approaching final years of his career. He has held the police chief position in at least three (3) cities prior to Greensboro: Durango, Colorado (April 27, 2017-December 2018); Hopewell, Virginia (January 1, 2019-December 2021); Dayton, Ohio (December 20, 2021-April 2026.) I wonder what fresh ideas he may have and with his lateral transfers, what can he accomplish in what appears may be a short stop in Greensboro.
He is banking up multiple retirements. In NC, as long as someone works in a municipality for at least five years, they tend to get vested and will earn some type of pension once they reach a certain age. Kamran probably earned a full pension somewhere once he got 20-25 years of service in. Then another in Dayton, where he served five years. And now, if he stays in GSO for five years, he will certainly earn another little something here. Plus, he could have earned bonuses and whatnot as part of his negotiated contracts in these other places, but was most likely just using them as stepping stones to bigger and better pay/pension. These old timers just can’t let it go sometimes and all they do is milk the system while rehashing old ideas. I wish him well, but I am pretty sure he’s just here to bilk another pension…oh and earn a quarter million a year while he does it. Way to go Greensboro.
I suspect you are spot-on. Can’t blame him for looking out for himself. Apparently, the city manager did not care if Kamran Afzal milked the system, he chose him. I suspect the city and the city manager gave Kamran Afzal’s age and his job-hopping serious thought but did not care because they have other plans that Kamran Afzal’s job-hopping fits right in. Time will tell.