To the great consternation of many residents in Summerfield, it’s now official: farmer and developer David Couch has won his battle to remove nearly 1,000 acres from the town in order to build a large residential and mixed-use development that he has been fighting with town leaders over for years.
On Thursday, June 27, the NC House of Representatives took the final vote to approve the de-annexation of the land from the town.
Summerfield covers about 27 square miles and has roughly 11,000 residents.
Some Summerfield residents have fought very hard to keep the town relatively free from development over the years, and it was an inability of Couch and town leaders to come to an agreement about the nature and density of the proposed development that led Couch to seek relief from the state legislature.
On July 1, that land will become part of unincorporated Guilford County, which will have much fewer restrictions on the project than Couch has been facing from the town.
So, those who fought the effort may now end up with something they dislike much more than they would have if the town had been able to reach a compromise with Couch.
This week’s two NC House debates over the bill showed that, even though the measure passed by a large margin, many members of the House were very unhappy with the way the process unfolded. The NC Senate had taken an unrelated bill that the House had previously approved and tacked the de-annexation bill onto it, which caused consternation to many House members – even some who, in the end, voted in favor of the bill.
Some House members complained that an item that controversial should have been a stand-alone bill while others said that it was very unfair of the Senate to tack the item onto a previously approved bill – which meant the Summerfield issue never went through the committee process in the House.
Some who voted for the bill said they were doing so because there was some very good legislation in it, though they lamented the fact that, in order to pass that legislation, they had to also vote on the Summerfield de-annexation issue.
The House members received hundreds of calls and emails leading up to the vote – almost all opposing the de-annexation – and some Summerfield residents and others held a public protest in Raleigh on Wednesday, June 26.
The move to de-annex the land was spearheaded by NC Sen. Phil Berger, who is a friend of Couch. Many critics of the action say Berger did this as a favor for Couch because Couch has made substantial campaign contributions to Berger. However, one source very close to the negotiations who wished to remain anonymous said it was his belief that Berger’s true reason was the one Berger keeps stating publicly.
“I talked with him about this personally and I believe he is sincerely concerned about the lack of housing in the area,” the source said.
Greensboro, Guilford County and the surrounding areas are landing medium and large business projects like crazy, which is likely to mean an influx of people in the future – and housing prices have been going up, as has the overall cost of buying a house since interest rates have shot up as well.
Berger has said repeatedly that Summerfield has been so restrictive in its development ordinances that the town severely limits a person’s right to put their property to its highest and best use. He has also said that more and varied housing is badly needed in that area.
The source said that the House votes – there were two votes to complete the process this week – would have been much closer had not the town seemed so dysfunctional at the present time. Recently, the entire town staff resigned in protest of the way that long-time Town Manager Scott Whitaker was let go by a majority of the Town Council.
“I think when they saw that, it helped some of them make their decision,” the source said of the town staff resigning.
In the weeks before the NC Legislature finally approved the move, Summerfield councilmembers were picking up trash in town parks and volunteers were cleaning the public bathrooms.
During the House debates, some proponents of de-annexation questioned why Summerfield was even a town since, they claimed, it provides so few services to its citizens.
Some have argued that Summerfield incorporated as a town for one reason and one reason alone – so the area wouldn’t become part of Greensboro.
Will Summerfield be ready for Section 8 housing? Increased taxes? Greensboro city water?
Blame for this de-annexation rests squarely on the shoulders of the Summerfield 4 who would not change their stance on development to allow apartments. The voters can also be blamed for electing the SF4, creating a completely dysfunctional town council.
Rest assured Berger and Co will benefit from this. And while I actually tend to lean towards supporting the property owners rights, let’s be clear about one thing….it’s all about the benjamin’s baby! All this talk about David building affordable housing in BS! Houses will be 500K or 600k minimum. Apartments will be 2k per month minimum. Maybe that’s affordable in some peoples books but not mine.
Just say it David.
Well, at least the residents of Summerfield can hold their heads high. They can get all goose-bumpy riding by and looking at all those apartments, high-dollar homes, and retail establishments and be proud that they forced Greensboro to deal with the headaches associated with collecting and spending all that tax money.
It was inevitable, as the urban sprawl continues, in the northwest. Money always wins, and the poor always lose. This opens up all of the beautiful, unspoiled part of Guilford county, to the unmitigated greed, of developers. Those poor people, trying to survive, in Summerfield, in trailers, in the tiny motel, off of 220, are totally screwed.
I hope Couch, with his millions, never feels another moment of peace, again. Karma is a bitch.
Ayes (Republican)
Adams; Arp; K. Baker; Bell; Bradford; Brisson; Brody; Cairns; Chesser; Clampitt; Cotham; Crutchfield; Dixon; Elmore; Goodwin; D. Hall; K. Hall; Hastings; Humphrey; Iler; Johnson; B. Jones; Kidwell; Lambeth; Lowery; McNeely; Miller; Mills; Moore (Speaker); Paré; Penny; Pickett; Pike; Pless; Potts; Pyrtle; Saine; Sasser; Sauls; Shepard; Carson Smith; Stevens; Strickland; Torbett; Tyson; Watford; Willis; Winslow; Zenger
Noes (Republican)
Balkcom; Biggs; Blackwell; Branson; Cleveland; Davis; Gillespie; N. Jackson; Loftis; Moss; Reeder; Riddell; Ross; Setzer; Sossamon; Ward; Wheatley; White
Ayes (Democrat)
Alston; A. Baker; T. Brown; Carney; Clemmons; Cunningham; Everitt; Harris; Hawkins; F. Jackson; Jeffers; Liu; Lofton; Lucas; Majeed; Pierce; Quick; Reives; Roberson; Charles Smith; Staton-Williams; Willingham; Wray
Noes (Democrat)
Ager; Autry; Ball; Belk; G. Brown; Buansi; Budd; Butler; Cervania; Crawford; Dahle; Gill; Harrison; John; A. Jones; Longest; Morey; Prather; Price; Rudow; von Haefen
Total votes: 111
Ayes: 72
Noes: 39
Not Voting: 0
Excused Absence: 9
Excused Vote: 0
If interested in finding out about each of the House members, highlight their name and then right click to search Google. Republicans believe that their constituents will not vote Democrat. However, there is another way of showing your disdain for your representative for voting for a rich man who wants to destroy 1,000 acres of land for greed. Do not vote for either candidate, Republican or Democrat. Leave your ballot for the office blank. Some voters think that if there is a candidate on a ballot, a vote must be cast, not true.
Thank goodness this is still today a free country. I like being able to make my own choices based on my life experiences. Adding to it business experience which by the likes of the town leaders has been sorely lacking, in my professional opinion as well.
Jealousy is also included along with Greed, the seven deadly sins of mankind we all like to throw our complaints at. Gee the same source those originate from works twoard loving ones neighbor.
Goodbye Summerfield. You did it to yourselves.
Great points. And why even have towns? Do away with them. Let developers decide what to do. They know best. Let freedom ring.
what service was city of summerfield providing the ‘1000 acres’ in exchange for the property taxes they were collecting ?
consider the salaries of the trash removers/bathroom cleaner ‘administration’ ?
What happened with Summerfield is not unlike Imminent Domain. The Senate and House members in Raleigh both agreed with the owner to condemn 1000 acres away from Summerfield because the owner has money and can pay off politicians to get the outcome he wants. The “yes” vote legislators (100% in Senate) went against the majority of the residents living in Summerfield and granted ONE person his request for de-annexation. This was all about greed, development, cronyism (palism, new word), and taking from the many to give to a few. That’s what government does best. What will be interesting is to see what Couch, GCC, and CofG do now. Promises have already been made and details have already been worked out. Both Guilford County politicians, Michael Garrett (Senate) and John Faircloth (House) were given cover with “excused” absences. See how government works? Isn’t it grand?
I have read and read again opinions that the Summerfield Town Councilmembers are to blame for de-annexation. I do not agree with that assessment. I believe that Couch wanted his land out of Summerfield all along, so he orchestrated the de-annexation process to gain sympathy for his plight by leading people to believe he is a victim of the Summerfield Councilmembers’ intransigent position on zoning. Remember, Greensboro refused to run water and sewer to his development. I believe this refusal had more to do with Greensboro’s festering feelings toward Summerfield rather than the cost. Therefore, if Couch’s land remained in Summerfield, and if Greensboro continued to refuse to run W&S, which is a strong probability, it would be very difficult, if not impossible, for Couch to develop his land. Couch and his friends in Raleigh, Greensboro, and Guilford County worked to make de-annexation possible. Everyone involved in this de-annexation effort will benefit financially from the outcome. I personally wish Couch and the others involved a grand failure.
The only persons who lose out on this project are the citizens of Summerfield. Now, after separating the city from this area to be developed, the citizens miss out on working together to make their city a more welcoming vibrant place to live and enjoy life together. Life will not stay the same anywhere on earth and when persons try to keep things from changing they always loose. If the citizens would have worked with the developer in a positive way everyone could have been a part of a wonderful time to live and enjoy all that will develop. An increase of good persons and a beautiful area that WE all can enjoy and appreciate. I hope that I live long enough to experience this wonderful place on earth. I wish everyone a wonderful live in a peaceful place on earth.
What a pie in the sky comment. David Couch got what he wanted from the beginning. There is no way Couch wanted to remain in Summerfield. This process was orchestrated to assure his goal of de-annexation. Had the Summerfield Councilmembers agreed to Couch’s request for rezoning, how was Couch to make his development happen without needed utilities, which Summerfield does not provide? Couch had to become a victim and gain sympathy for his perceived plight to get the de-annexation through Raleigh. Phil Berger was not the only enthusiastic supporter of de-annexation. I feel certain that Dan Blue (D/Senate) was more than eager to help. This entire process demonstrates how backroom deals are made. This dealmaking is not limited to one political party. In this case, the winner is ONE individual with money and influence. The loser is a small town that was railroaded by greedy and nefarious politicians and ONE developer. Term limits help curtail political influence.
Summerfield will be a great place for the new low income housing. Everyone needs a place to live.
Attention developers, your money will be guaranteed by the government, so what are you waiting on? Get busy!