From Rhino Reader Kimball Shinkoskey
President Trump is a frustrated savior. If only he had been there, he could have fixed it all. For example, recently he said, “I would have won in Vietnam if I had been President.”
He also has reminded us that if he had been President, Russia would never have attacked Ukraine and Hamas would have never invaded Israel.
Seems like if Trump had only lived in Bible times, Jesus would never have been strung up on a cross and Noah would never have had to fill up an ark with animals.
We get it, Mr. President. Only you can fix anything and everything that ever goes wrong on planet earth.
You have been working hard to fix the November 2026 midterm elections, haven’t you? But what if you can’t? Then your house of perpetual saving grace comes tumbling down to the ground, doesn’t it sir?
Kimball Shinkoskey
I don’t think he’s reading the Rhino, Kimball. Nice rant though.
—————-
That’s funny… I thought Trump was elected, in a popular vote, by the American people.
As I said, Leftists only believe in democracy when their outcome prevails.
Hypocrites.
Democracy doesn’t mean you blindly support a poorly performing president.
——————
I didn’t say it did.
Shinkosky is accusing Trump of trying to “fix” the midterms, without evidence. So he’s refusing to accept the democratic verdict – before the elections have even taken place.
But… if the Democratic Party does well, all his reservations will evaporate and the elections will magically become legitimate and unquestionable.
As i said, Leftists only believe in democratic outcomes when their side prevails.
Trump has said openly that he wants maximize gerrymandering to increase the number of republican seats in the House and Senate. To do that outside of a census update is indeed trying to ‘fix’ the midterms given his poor polling numbers. The SAVE act is also a way to limit women voters who tend to lean democrat in national elections.
So, what do you mean by “That’s funny… I thought Trump was elected, in a popular vote, by the American people.” What does that have to do with the 2026 election? Yes, he was elected by our electoral voting process. Yes, his polling numbers stink. Yes, he is trying to ‘fix’ the election process to his party’s advantage. How doesn’t pointing to these truths deny his election?
“Trump has said openly that he wants maximize gerrymandering to increase the number of republican seats in the House and Senate.” Cite your source.
Oh, and he won both the electoral AND popular vote. Forgive me for correcting the All Mighty professor/Chris.
Here are a couple sources Alan. Maybe you should diversify where you get your news as this is well understood position of Trump’s.
C-SPAN On-Camera Interview:
The Quote: When a reporter asked how many seats he wanted Republicans to draw in Texas, Trump responded: “Five.” He added: “I think we get five, and there could be some other states. We’re going to get another three or four or five in addition. Texas would be the biggest one, and that will be five… Just a simple redrawing. We pick up five seats. But we have a couple of other states where we’ll pick up seats also.”Source: View the recorded exchange via the C-SPAN White House Event Clip.2 here: https://www.c-span.org/clip/white-house-event/user-clip-president-trump-says-he-wants-a-simple-redrawing-of-the-texas-congressional-map-so-republican-pick-up-five-house-seats/5167813
CNBC “Squawk Box” Phone Interview
The Quote: Speaking about the push to pass partisan maps in Texas, Trump explicitly stated: “We are entitled to five more seats.” He cited his electoral performance in the state as justification: “We have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats… and I won Texas. I got the highest vote in the history of Texas, as you probably know, and we are entitled to five more seats.”
Notice the use of the word ‘entitled’.
Please don’t take this the wrong way Austin, but they are the Democrat party (aka the (National Socialist) Democrat Party), not Democratic.
I know, I’m nitpicking, but so many people make that mistake (although professor/Chris the All Knowing hasn’t, as far as I know).
Here goes Alan using his scary word ‘socialist’ even though it clearly doesn’t apply to democrats. I understand Alan isn’t bright enough or willing to think for himself enough to understand that socialist is very different than Social Democrats which much more closely aligns with actual Democrat’s agenda.
This is as ignorant of a statement as when Alan repeats the lie that the US isn’t a democracy. What a tool. Alan is just another sheep repeating the ‘scary’ words as trained by conservative social media and conservative ‘news’ organizations.
Yawn
Thanks, Alan.
Joe Biden won in 2020 by popular vote and fools like you said he didn’t and insisted that it was stolen. Keep drinking the cool aid and let your God ( Donald Trump ) use the Con Game you.
Oh gosh! Say it ain’t so KS!
I wish that We could get back to America before Trump.
This Man is only worrying about Himself.
What has Our country turned to Families hating each
Other because of politics. Listen every party has good and bad
But Trump is constantly playing Americans again one
Other. He lost in 2020 and He encouraged His gang
To go after His own Vice president He complained and
Cried that He really won. Now Everytime He is not
Happy with the results only if He wins Narcissistic.
Who the hell are you, idiot communist
So now you are communist because you don’t support Trump? Weird.
You guys really need to define what you mean by communist as I don’t think it means what you think (assuming you think for yourself) it means.
Anyone out there driven by Lowes on Battlegroud on any recent Saturday? It looks like a dual prostate exam – hormone supplement free clinic. Never imagined seniors would lead the ranks of the great unwashed! The virtue signaling is really quite cute.
hate to break it to you pal but presidents dont go up for reelection in misterms
Now that the Producer price index has shot up to 6 per cent and there is no end in sight, we can be grateful for the mess made by the Administration of our economy, inflation, joblessness and health care. I can see this ending badly. We ain’t communists just ordinary Americans who are being whipsawed by this Administration. God help us.
————
Quite so, Charles. In repeated news reports I’ve read how inflation is the highest it’s been since December 2022.
It’s obviously because of the one-time spike temporary in oil.
Who was the President in 2022? Biden had no oil spike, just huge deficit spending and printing money. Which he and his Party caused.
Charles, you will notice how Austin ignores some very important facts in his take on inflation during Biden’s term versus the current Trump term.
What happened during Biden’s term Austin? You clearly have left out a key event that caused a global spike in inflation. COVID supply chain disruptions. Biden didn’t cause COVID or the supply chain disruptions. You also ignore that inflation started to spike in April of 2021 before Biden had implemented any fiscal or monetary policies…..
But….no question who caused the spike in oil prices by starting an unnecessary and poorly planned war with Iran. Blame is not a debate for this spike in our cost of living. Trump’s war mongering led to these price increases. Full Stop. And they won’t just ‘go away’ when the war ends. Oil prices will not drop back to pre-war levels right away as with all supply chains, disruptions take significant time to reach ‘normal’ again. There are also concerns with energy infrastructure such as pipelines that might take months or even years to fully repair.
Happy to fill in the blanks for you. Best wishes
————-
Go away and get a life.
Of course, Austin wants the guy pointing out the full set of facts to go away so he can push his false narrative.
———–
No, you’re just not worth the time and effort necessary to correct you. And it’s pointless anyway, because as Rebel once said, arguing with you is “like pissing in the wind”.
A bit crude perhaps, but he’s right, because you never concede that your argument is erroneous – even when it has been proven so.
We can infer from this that you’re not here to engage in honest debate and discussion, but rather to score points in order to feel superior.
The pompous and pretentious name you’ve adopted suits you… “Professor”.
But “Wanker” is more accurate.
Everything I said was factual and accurate. Seems like you are making excuses to avoid those truths.
————–
On the contrary my friend, everything I SAID is factual and accurate.
You are the one making excuses for Biden.
And as I pointed out, it is what you left out that makes your statement inaccurate…so sure, it was factual but incomplete making your conclusion (2022 inflation all only Biden’s fiscal policy that was to blame) inaccurate.
Hope that helps.
————-
Well it helps you feel better about yourself – which is why you’re here.
Reality makes no impact on your psyche, because you cannot perceive reality correctly.
In other words, you are a Leftist.
————–
I heard an example on the radio news today. A silly naive Liberal woman was pushed down a staircase in New York by a black man, She refused to press charges because she didn’t want another black man in prison. The criminal walked free, and promptly pushed a 71 year old man down a staircase. He died.
That stupid liberal woman could not accept reality – and the reality is that she is responsible for that old man’s murder.
I am here to offer a fact-based alternative to misinformation, oversimplification, and lies that drive conservative hate of facts, data, and science t0 justify their hatred of the left. Nothing more….nothing less.
I suggest it is conservatives who can’t accept the complexity of reality and oversimplify problems to the point that their hate becomes generalized against entire classes of people unjustly and then feed that bias by openly accepting more misinformation that feeds that bias.
Using your radio story as an example: You are repeating a misrepresentation of the actual events. It is again what you leave out of the story:
1) Police were actively pursuing a charge against the individual, but he was granted supervised release after his arraignment. [In other words, sure the victim made that comment at one time but that didn’t stop his arrest]
2) It was a month later [NOT EXACTLY PROMPTLY] he was picked up by the NYPD for acting erratically with a stick outside a precinct. He was taken to Bellevue Hospital for a psychiatric evaluation but was discharged about an hour later [So a key take away is yet again how our society lacks any help for people suffering from mental illness]
3) While the victim’s refusal to cooperate impacted how the initial assault was handled, Burke’s ultimate release just hours before the murder was the result of a rapid discharge from a hospital psychiatric hold, which became a primary focus of a city investigation…..
Complexity. It was a range of factors that led to the tragedy but you only post about the liberal angle of the victims and ignore the other factors that don’t feed the narrative you want to portray….not to mention using 20/20 hindsight given the limited nature of the initial assault versus later events.
As a critical thinker, I always check for the actual source of stories versus how it is presented. Especially when it is presented as a means to justify hate against a group of people such as group of people for their political, religious or cultural differences.
Hope that helps.
——————
What pathetic caviling. You’re dancing on the head of a pin.
And it doesn’t make a ha’porth of difference to the second victim of the black criminal, who’s dead.
You love to claim that your sophistry is based on “fact”. Okay, here’s a fact.
In your comment of May 17 @ 10.05pm in reference to my earlier comment, you said : “So sure, it was factual.”
That’s right, my comment was true. It’s a pity you can’t accept the truth.
—————————
The defining characteristic of all Leftists is that they have a reality perception problem.
I know, my mother was one of them.
You go to ‘trick’ is to give factual yet grossly inaccurate information so you can falsely frame a situation or topic to your personal bias. Not complicated.
The subway attack story is a classic example. Your only response is yet another personal insult. Got it.
Hope that helps.
————-
Yes, I provide factual information. It is not inaccurate.
Only a mentally ill Leftist would have a problem with that.
Yes, it was inaccurate. You said ‘promptly’ went and pushed another person down some stair….it was actually about a month later so not exactly promptly and was also after another detainment by police.
It is the details you choose to leave that makes your statement misrepresentative of the actual events. Classic trick of propogandists…use some truth but mispresent the situation to fit a specific narrative.
You left out the entire part about his mental instability, his detainment and actual arrest, his being released by the courts, his again be detained by police and evaluated by mental health professionals and then released again by the hospital.
Your misrepresentation made it look solely the choice of the woman who refused to pursue charges against the man in the first attack even though the real release promptly before he killed the man, was the mental hospital.
So yes, you are very inaccurate by omission to the full story. Which is something you have done here many times to push false narratives. But don’t worry I am happy to call it out whenever necessary.
Best wishes.
————-
So now you want to say my comment was inaccurate because the criminal took a couple of weeks to commit the same crime, and that isn’t “promptly”..?
You’re pathetic.
Caviling.
LOL, again you leave things out to push a false narrative.
Your story was inaccurate because:
– A month isn’t prompt (it wasn’t a couple of weeks)
– Left out he was released by the courts after being arrested
– Left out he was against detained by police before the event
– Left out he was deem struggling with mental illness and taken to a mental hospital
– Left out he was released by mental hospital before the fatal attack.
That’s a lot you like to leave out pushing your false narrative. Hope that helps
———-
Pathetic. The story is true.
Sure it is, now that I included all the details you left out so you could improperly frame the story.
Which is what the Democrats want to do again if they can cause enough unrest to win over them he people in the middle.
Balance the budgets by having wealthy and corporations pay fair share of taxes….no new wars…reduce inflation (again)…invest in green energy and other critical innovative tech and medical research, promote US independence for crirical resources such as chips manufacturing, rare earth minerals, increase healthcare coversge and affordability, address housong crisis, improve affordability with productove global trade agreements, and restore alliances with key European Counties……so basically try to reverse all the mistakes made by Trump’s first two years in office.
Hope that thelps.
Trump faces at least three big dilemmas: Iran, the economy, and the 2026 midterm elections. So if Trump can’t pull a Houdini with a clever or unexpected solution to these difficult problems, while battling Democrats and their media, he will continue to face a “darn if he does and darn if he doesn’t” situation. As former president Lyndon B. Johnson said, “You know, doing what is right is easy. The problem is knowing what is right.”
Trump can neither afford to continue the conflict with Iran nor afford to back down, but public dissatisfaction with the economy and war increases, which could very well affect the mid-term elections. Trump’s high disapproval ratings may become a significant problem for the Republican Party.
The first place for Trump to start is to quit using phrases like “nobody thought it was possible”, “as nobody has ever seen before”, and “we’re the hottest country in the world”.
Trump’s narcissistic nature, characterized by an obsession with power and self-importance, shapes how many citizens perceive him.
Trump’s best move would be to stick to his policies and avoid the personal stuff he gets caught up in. Making his presidency about the issues is essential for credibility. He needs to step back and correct his course, focusing on fundamental policies rather than personal disputes that fuel division and malice among many in the country.
Trump gets caught up in personal grudges, reactive attacks, impulsive reactions, and petty disputes that do not serve his political interests. He already has the MAGA folks, but some of his comments lack quality and may fail to win over independent voters for the Republican Party.
Trump should stop trolling his enemies and focus on economic prosperity, since it matters most to voters. In the meantime, I will keep trolling Chris.
Good for you for noting Trump’s deep flaws and loss of popularity. His strategy will be as it always has been, to double down unless he can figure out a way to personally profit from pivoting. Crazy that people support such a poor leader who has clearly lost his focus and mental health.
Let’s check in on his campaign promises:
Reduce immigration and increase deportations – success but ignored laws and human decency
Reduced taxes for himself and his wealthy friends – success
Reduce inflation – failed
Reduced cost of living – failed
Reduce government spending – failed
Reduce cost of gas – failed
Improved health care access – failed
Reduced cost of healthcare – failed
Tariff trade strategy – failed
Deconstruct DEI – success but no real impact to Americans
Boost US Manufacturing – failed (actual factory construction spending has declined since Biden administration)
End Ukraine War – failed
Bring Peace to the World – failed – actually started his own needless war
Reduce cost of energy – failed (even before unproved Iran War)
Protect US Farmers – failed (farming bankruptcies have spiked 46%)
Drain the Swamp – failed (Trump has funneled billions into his businesses and even more into this wealthy friends pockets.)
Crazy to think MAGA cult members have been conned into believing Trump is actually successful.
Failure and bankruptcy follow Trump wherever he goes. Did you get your Gold Platted phone made in the US?
—————–
The Prolix Professor has way too much time on his hands .
Can’t make the case that any of those are wrong so you just make a worthless comment about time management. LOL
————–
You’re right for once. You’re not worth the time.
And don’t forget aboutTrump’s pardons of individuals convicted of public corruption, which generally involves elected and career officials stealing public funds or accepting bribes to hand out government benefits.
Failure doesn’t follow Trump, Chrissy. He’s wealthy and has been elected president twice. What have you done?
i haven’t sexually assaulted women as Trump has…I haven’t been banned from running charities in my home state as Trump has…I haven’t cheated hard working Americans out of compensation for service rendered as Trump has…etc..
If you only judge people by wealth and power, then you have a shallow way of viewing people and success.
Best wishes and thank you for pointing out my miss on how Trump has filled the swamp, not drained it.
It’s not a Swamp. A Swamp is a beautiful thing God created. It’s a Sewer.
Trump is still the best-intended president in my lifetime.
Agree that a sewer is a much better discription. What has Trump done that is good for this country?
Is it pushing away of trading partners? The increased cost of living? New wars and his failure to end old ones as promised? Reduced number of people with affordable health insurance? Failed trade policies based of tariffs? Increased Government spending and national debt? Deeper division of Americans over politics? Reduced spending on new manufacturing capacity? Higher costs for healthcare? Ongoing housing crisis? Conspiracy theories having more weight over science? Spike in farm bankruptcies? The embarassement over Greenland and Canada takeovers? Reduced US innovation due to massive cuts in federal research grants? ICE agaents killing protesters? Massive grifting of his followers with Gold phone bs, bibles, shies, watches and failed ctrypto (used to take brides from foreign sources)? Etc…etc…
But he did reduce the number of foreigners in the US. There is that. But what really has he done to improve the way of life the average American?
And don’t forget we are still waiting on our big checks from DOGE and Tariffs.
Meanwhile back at the ranch…the Guilford County Republican Party Chair sleeps while the At Large Commissioners seat will go to uncontested to the race baiting, DEI loving so called pastor Greg Drumwright.
If you think Skip is bad just wait till this charlatan becomes County Commissioner. Its preordained and the local GOP does not care a whit.
Trump must have done something right: Nearly 4 million people dropped off SNAP after the One Big Beautiful Bill Act was enacted. This was due to stricter eligibility rules, expanded work requirements, and a reduction in the number of non-US citizens receiving benefits.
Illegal border crossings are at their lowest level in 4 decades.
I may be Trump’s number 1 fan, but I will call balls and strikes.
No voter ID laws in California. Maybe I should go there and vote for Republican Spencer Pratt. I’ll just say my name is Professor Chris.
People struggling with feeding themselves is viewed as a good thing by republicans? Got it. Makes me proud to not be a republican. Are you especially proud of how he removed the veteran’s exclusion? How about his removing of former foster kids who have really struggled in their early life?
There might have been an argument for the cuts if the administration used the cuts to actually reduce spending, but instead he is spending $1 billion upgrading ‘his’ new airplane or $26 billion for a poorly panned and unnecessary war that has raised the cost of living? How about the $6 million over budget for the US Army to deploy them to ‘guard the border’ when they weren’t needed? The list goes on. End of the day Trump has actually managed to increase Government spending year over year.
But sure. More people are struggling to feed themselves. Yeah for Republicans.
Please again, I ask you not use my actual name.
You could travel to NYC and claim to be a Democratic Socialist and be welcomed with open arms. Contrary to the Professor’s attempts to distance Democrats from Socialism, Zohran Mamdani ran his campaign as a Democratic Socialist, was cheered by those in attendance at his rally’s, and was later endorsed by nearly every Democratic Party leader.
And has already balanced the budget after inheriting a $12 billion budget deficit by targeting internal efficiencies, taxes on wealthy people’s second homes, and Pension liability restructuring, all while funding a new program for universal childcare for working class New Yorkers, expanded public bathrooms and citywide trash collection, won more than $34 million in settlements, judgements and mandatory repairs from landlords violating housing laws, implementing new rent controls to address housing crisis, protected library funding,
Funny he hasn’t yet tried to take control of industry as socialism requires public or collective ownership…..he can call himself what he wants. His policies more align with social democracy and whatever you call him, so far, he has been affective which scares the S**t out of Republicans who try to falsely label democrats as socialists or communists.
Professor, You play a twisted game don’t you? The original subject I responded to was your claim that there were no Democratic Socialists. As was explained to you, and you appear to now have accepted as true, is the fact that the entire Democratic Party is led by Socialists. NYC Mayor Mamdani campaigned as a Democratic Socialist and has been endorsed by nearly every leader of the Democratic Party since he has been in office. Campaign followers at his rallies cheered in mass every time he claimed to be a Democratic Socialist. I’m surprised you attempted to bluff everyone in your post.
Regardless, instead of admitting your mistake, you have chosen to change the subject in your response to Mamdani’s budget deficit “successes”. You mentioned the deficit was $12 billion when Mamdani entered office as mayor. You got that part correct but you failed to mention the $12 billion deficit payments are due in both 2026 and 2027. The $7 billion due in 2027 is now mostly ignored by the liberal media in their haste to claim that Mamdani solved the deficit in just a few short months. But the $7 billion deficit remains and will need to be addressed later. The $5 billion due this year has been mostly solved through a $5 billion “gift” from Governor Hochul (a portion will be used towards the 2027 deficit) who decided to transfer money that should have been used to the benefit of all NY’ers but instead will be funneled to the benefit of the “rising star” within the Democratic Socialist Party and the citizens of NYC. Another financial manipulation that Mamdani has employed to “balance the 2025 deficit” is stretching pension payments further into the future for city employees. This moves the 2025 deficit further into the future but doesn’t reduce the overall balance.
In closing, you mentioned that Mamdani hasn’t attempted to take over industry or collective ownership in NYC. It was mentioned on the news this morning that Mamdani plans to take over vacant buildings in the city and turn them over to more “socialist” organizations. Appears he’s on schedule.
Professor, I checked this morning, and the total funds to be transferred to Mamdani by Governor Hochul is now nearly $8 billion over a 2 year period. This funding is acknowledged as being directed towards balancing the deficit in NYC.
Mamdani also extended pension payments to city employees an additional 5 years in an obvious attempt to reduce debt payments near-term. The debt doesn’t go away, it just shows on the books as a smaller annual amount for a longer period of time. No deficit balancing magic happening in NYC by Mamdani.
On the subject of Democratic Socialists, Katie Wilson, the mayor of Seattle, also campaign under that banner. The fact that you refuse to accept her and Mamdani’s repeated acknowledgments of what they represent is a reflection on you and your twisted approach in attempting to fashion a favorable image of the Democratic Party that just doesn’t exist in today’s reality.
Please respond as I am anxious to read your post even though you may change the subject again.
The budget is balanced. Correct.
On the subject of Democratic Socialists. They aren’t socialists. And more importantly their policies much more closely align with social democrats given they support capitalism but just with regulations that keep the balance of wealth and power from harming the working class, the environment and the climate.
Unlike the republican party, there are a wide range of political beliefs and opinions that are allowed to exist in the democrats ranks. If a republican disagrees publicly with even a single issue, they are labeled a RINO and kicked out of the party. I prefer to support a party that supports individual thinking even though I don’t agree with every single member’s point of view.
Best wishes.
Unfortunately, Trump has decided to let another half million Chinese attend college in the U.S. Mr. President, the number should be zero. I thought you said America First?
Trump is nothing more than “Trump First”. Worst and most corrupt president in US history.
What are you thoughts on your tax dollars being used for a $1.6 billion slush fund for Trump’s associates because they were investigated (and many convicted) back when Biden was in office? The sewer/swamp keeps getting deeper under Trump.
————-
I think that if Obama hadn’t weaponized the IRS to target conservative organizations, none of this would have been necessary.
Third World tactics from a Third World leader.
That never happened. Just another unproven conspiracy theory by conservatives to manufacture hate against their opponents. There were multiple independent, years-long investigations that found the White House (Obama) did not orchestrate or know about the screening practices before they became public.
Even the approach used by the IRS was proven far less nefarious than accused (although still in appropriate).
Happy to walk you through the details (the full set of details given your practice of shortchanging the details that don’t fit your desired narrative).
————-
Glad you agree that the targeting of conservative organizations by the IRS was inappropriate.
And, of course, Obama was shocked – shocked, I tell you! – that this was happening under his watch….
It was indeed. Although the initial intent was never it was framed to by conservatives for political advantage. Yes, he was disappointed and publicly condemned the actions of the IRS and had the head of the IRS resign. All things a good leader does when corruption is found in his organization under his leadership.
Too bad our current President won’t follow Obama’s lead. Instead, he is directly behind the corruption and openly being allowed to funnel billions of tax dollars to his associates as well as personally direct the IRS to stop auditing his fraudulent tax returns.
Obama was 10x the leader as Trump is and has 1000x more ethical integrity than the corrupt Trump Dump. Would you like a list of all the grifting and corruption by Trump in just this year and half of this term? Happy to list out.
I think Trump has used his pardon power too often for political allies.
He has pardoned many individuals convicted of public corruption, which generally involves elected and career officials stealing public funds or accepting bribes to hand out government benefits.
One more for the list…..his giving the reflecting pool contract to his buddy via a no-bid-contract who has now blown the budget up from an estimated 1.8 million to now 13.1 millions of your tax dollars.
New corruption from his joke every day. What is the next one on your list salt?
Well professor….I don’t mind calling balls and strikes on any politician, no matter the party. You seem to just call strikes on conservatives.
.
Bingo !
SALT LIFE 1 – “PROFESSOR” 0
Weird that you two think two people agreeing on a topic is an ‘own’. LOL. Salt and I are the same in that we call out the failures of leaders regardless of party. Here of late considering conservatives control House, Senate and Whitehouse, not a lot to blame on democrats given everything happening is at the direction of the Republicans.
I have been critical of the Biden administration but also willing to call out his successes.
But you be you. Professor 1 Salt Life 1
Cheers
If you want to know what kind of guy “The Professor” is, here’s a good illustration.
He himself declares that he has “scored”. It’s not unusual for this smug, self-satisfied jerk to agree with himself by saying “Yep” in his own comments, agreeing with himself. Or “I get it that…” as he endorses whatever he’s about to assert.
He’s an intellectual self-pleasurer. No wonder they call him a wanker (look it up).
“The Wanker Professor”
Another ad hominem from Austin
Yawn
While campaigning for office, Trump told us, “When I win, I will immediately bring down prices, starting on Day One”. It didn’t happen.
He never had a plan. Just a concept of a plan. LOL
I enjoy a good moderate Republican, but Trump calls them RINOs. I wish both parties had more moderates. Maybe Congress would work better for the people.
I strongly agree!
Now, Trump wants his face on a $250 bill. Only the rich will carry these in their wallets. It’s difficult now just to get many places to accept a $100 bill.
You can use it to buy a ticket to go to the top of the arch he wants built in his honor.