A letter to the editor from Rhino Times reader Alan Burke
People being born gay is central to LGTB ideology. The problem is that a large portion of homosexuals didn’t “realize they were born gay” until late adulthood. To cover this, we have been told that society (the man) convinced them that they were heterosexual. We are also told that this discontinuity causes such severe emotional pain that it should be considered physical assault.
If society can convince a homosexual that they are heterosexual, it can also convince a heterosexual that they are homosexual. Incorrectly convincing a heterosexual should be equally damaging. Despite this, we are forced to “educate,” encourage and promote homosexuality early and often.
To promote transgenderism, biased anthropologists claim that skeletal remains and genetics cannot be used to differentiate males from females. There are a few individuals who may have had disorders causing different anatomical presentations. The same anthropologists simultaneously use skeletal remains and genetics to determine if famous historical figures were “early transgenders.” These methods are only accurate if used to promote LGTB ideology.
How do you define a person, in opposite-sex marriage, who (allegedly) performs homosexual acts? It depends on whether it helps or hurts LGTB ideology. Several historical figures are now being labeled gay based on what their contemporary historians considered as rumors to discredit them. Also, changing writing styles and resource utilization are being manipulated. As an example, Lincoln lived in politically tumultuous times where individuals used passionate language and frequently shared resources. Friends and family wrote passionate letters and shared clothes/beds in nonsexual ways. However, since we use different writing styles and no longer share clothes/beds today, Lincoln is now “gay.” Despite sleeping in the same bed, sharing clothes, and writing passionately phrased letters to his family, Lincoln has not yet been labeled as incestuous (until it is added to the alphabet). At the same time, crime statisticians/social scientists have been forced to label individuals in heterosexual marriages arrested for acts against same-sex individuals as heterosexual. This is intentionally done to “reduce stereotyping.” Of course, it also manipulates the statistics. When a historical figure in a heterosexual marriage allegedly performs a homosexual act, the individual is gay. If the same person committed a crime today, he/she/they would be labeled as heterosexual.
No ideology/behavior should be made a legally protected “minority” group. In the name of equity, we have been forced to ignore reality, huge logic holes, and outright manipulation.
Alan Burke
There is a great deal of science out that has studied the question and disagree with you but I assume you don’t agree with science that doesn’t fit your bias so I will basic logic examples as ypu selectively have to help ypu see the real answer.
Many people come open the idea of their homosexuality late in life as a result of their sexuality being repressed during their younger year both at home and in society more generally. If you are told being gay is wrong and evil etc…, you will do all you can to follow the norm. Many stories can be found of this denials being forced to live a life you don’t ‘feel’ sexually appropriate
Another example is that homosexuality exists in communities where death is in order if your sexaulity is discovered so clearly those individuals didn’t choose to be gay.
The more basic question is why do you find what you find sexually attractive sexual versus the alternative? You didn’t choose to find women attractiveness you are a man, your biology defined it for you.
Happy to provide sources to the science behind sexual orientation if interested.
I think you’re far too logical and science-based for him, Chris. But I do appreciate you trying.
Wow, Alan. That’s quite a word salad. Don’t worry, though. We–the gays and transgenders–would never try to manipulate you into supporting our ideology. It’s obvious you’re far too smart for that.