Letter to the Editor from Rhino Times Reader J. Sorban
Since my recent letter implying harms from the Emergency-Use-Authorization jab (for the Fauci-funded virus), it has been announced that Biden has been diagnosed with highly advanced Stage 4 prostate cancer. With a doctor’s office in the White House and the normal extended course of prostate cancer, the tardiness of this announcement is intriguing.
There is a possible explanation related to the topic of my previous letter. In April 2024, the Journal Cureus published a peer-reviewed study about rising cancer deaths in Japan following the third jab. By 2024, Japanese deaths from prostate cancer had skyrocketed to 80% over the 2018 baseline. [1]
18 months after the initiation of the jab in September 2022, the UK Telegraph reported an NHS study finding that prostate cancer deaths had tripled “during the pandemic.” [2]
Now the forces who inflicted the Plandemic grift on us—it created VAST FORTUNES and impoverished or killed vast numbers of people– are redoubtable. They are hard at work attacking science: They suppress studies exposing vaccine harms and news articles suggesting studies that might be called for. Big Pharma funds the publications. The bureaucrats in the government wing of the medical-industrial complex surely have the data allowing comparison of the health outcomes of the vaxxed versus the unvaxxed. Not only do they not do the studies, but they also keep the data secret.
Food for mental mastication.
J. Sobran
There is no way to prove this, but after so many medical reports due to the dangers of the vaccine, one must wonder.
2018 was the year I faced a life-altering decision- a diagnosis of prostate cancer. I chose to undergo a radical procedure, the removal of my prostate.
Then, in 2020, a year that will forever be etched in our memories, I received not one, but two COVID vaccinations.
But the story doesn’t end there. In 2022, the ‘cells’ of my prostate cancer made a comeback, and I found myself facing a new battle- 39 days of radiation.
I will always wonder….
Thank you for sharing that, Salt Life. I wish you good luck in what is surely a terrible struggle.
In so many ways, our medical-industrial complex obscures anyone’s ability to know relevant truth: Between 2020 and 2022, pharmaceutical companies paid $1.06 billion to reviewers at leading medical journals, the New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA, Lancet, and BMJ, thus corrupting the peer review process. And I believe Big Pharma generally funds the publications themselves.
Also related to this sad topic, vaxxed Dilbert cartoonist Scott Adams now has late-stage prostate cancer.
This guy really knows his stuff. He can see through the BS we were sold, and he speaks truth. He even provides footnotes to his letter.
I got a Pfizer jab and regretted it immediately. Within 24 hours I felt like s**t. REALLY s**t. Couldn’t go to work.
God knows what permanent damage it’s done, but I never went back for another one. And I don’t trust the doctors and experts any more.
You do realize that the study from Japan was retracted, and the article related to prostate cancer deaths makes very clear that the cause was the number of men that failed to seek treatment during COVID due to restrictions at hospitals. The subject of elevated mortality has been studied very closely by a range of countries with findings being clearly linked to reduced preventive care during the pandemic due to overwhelmed hospitals. These elevated mortality rates continued past the covid pandemic for the exact reasons noted in your second source….which don’t include any long-term impact of the vaccine.
You really aren’t very good at spreading misinformation with your poor attempt to push the idea that the Covid vaccine is dangerous.
———
The Clot Shot kills, and will continue to kill.
Myocarditis, pericarditis, stroke, heart attack, all number of auto-immune diseases (esp. Guillain-Barre Syndrome), tinnitus, chronic migraine, blood clotting, impaired immune system (VAIDS – Vaccine Induced Immune Deficiency Syndrome), and so on.
And the only thing that was “pushed” was the COVID jabs themselves.
Have any peered reviewed source other than your yelling and screaming about it every time it comes up? Nope.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11177983/
Abstract:
We analyzed the risk-benefit of COVID-19 vaccine using a causal model to explain and weigh up possible risk factors of blood clots after vaccination. A self-controlled case series method was used to examine the association between blood clots and COVID-19 vaccination. To avoid bias due to the under-reported infection among non-hospitalized subjects, a case-control study was used to compare the risk of blood clots in infected subjects to control subjects who were hospitalized due to physical injury. We found increased risks of blood clots after vaccination (incidence rate ratio is 1.13, 95% CI: [1.03,1.24] after the first dose and 1.23, 95% CI: [1.13,1.34] after the second dose). Furthermore, vaccination attenuated the increased risk of blood clots associated with infection (odds ratio is 2.16, 95% CI: [1.93,2.42] in unvaccinated versus 1.46, 95% CI: [1.25,1.70] in vaccinated). After accounting for vaccine efficacy against infection and the protection against infection-associated blood clots, receiving the COVID-19 vaccines decreases the risk of blood clots, especially during high infection rate period.
In case you don’t know what the above means, it means that the risk of a blood clot is higher with covid absent the vaccine that it is with just the vaccine. Hense it is riskier to have covid than to have the vaccine.
THAT is what science says. I will listen to science versus some guy on the internet.
But you be you
Ah…. “science” ! Chrissy’s God. A crutch for people who can’t think for themselves (and who misunderstand the nature of science).
“That is what science says” ! This guy sounds like a seven year old.
Hense (sic!), nobody buys his verbose sophistry. A fool posing as a genius.
Your statement puts you in the same class of people who claim the earth is flat.
Science has standards for how data is analyzed, presented and summarized into firm conclusions. The guy on the internet saying he knows better than science, has no data, no skills to analyze the data in any meaningful way, and doesn’t allow for others to comment on the quality of his conclusions.
In other words, the guy on the internet in just a guy (or gal) with an opinion that isn’t worth any more than the gut feeling Aunt Martha has about Aliens coming down and probing her in the middle of the night. On the other hand, a scientist is a guy (or gal) who has specific training and skills that make them worth listening to and respecting their conclusions as fact once peer reviewed.
But you be you.
*
When you learn to master basic English, “hense” I will take you seriously.
You’re a joke.
You are misinterpreting the study. “We found increased risks of blood clots after vaccination … after the first dose and … after the second dose.” The control group was not unvaccinated people, but rather people who were in the hospital for non-Covid reasons–physical injury! [some control group!]– and tested negative on the absurdly meaningless PCR tests. To the extent this study shows anything meaningful, it is that the vax increased blood clots!
There really are no valid studies showing any long-term benefit to the vax and quite a few statistical series and other indications of harm. There definitely are no double-blind studies showing the vax is safe. None have been attempted. Why?
Again, why will the CDC not allow anyone access to the health outcomes of the vaxxed and unvaxxed? Why! We want real science!
There is a giant pile of studies that document the benefit of the covid vaccine.
Here is a well-rounded article that includes link to many studies you claim don’t exists. https://www.cdc.gov/covid/vaccines/benefits.html#:~:text=Getting%20vaccinated%20against%20COVID%2D19,illness%2C%20hospitalization%2C%20and%20death.
I didn’t misread the study. I quote the study directly: “receiving the COVID-19 vaccines decreases the risk of blood clots, especially during high infection rate period.”
Key is the ‘especially during high infection rate periods’. In other words, people who didn’t receive the jab had a higher risk of clots given Covid itself causes clots at a much higher rate than the jab. (both of which are actually small chances)
Not complicated
* Oh… and I forgot all the new “turbo cancers” ! That’s the term for these unprecedented rapidly progressing cancers that are often appearing in atypical patients like very young people.
The study was retracted after it had passed peer review! No reason was given! After quite a bit of time…no reason was given. The peers who reviewed it endorsed the data and method. Big Pharma owns pretty much all those publications and chokes real science.
A tripling of prostate cancer deaths 18 months after the vax roll-out seems like a lot to explain via people not going to doctors during the Plandemic. Don’t you think? Avoidance of doctors generally is associated with better health, as medical mistakes are the 3rd leading cause of death in the US.
The evidence of the Fauci “vax” being harmful is massive. There are very few of us who don’t know someone harmed or killed by the toxic jab. I know 3 personally. It is horrible that thousands of people currently suffering from myocarditis and debilitating neurological problems are being gaslighted and made to remain invisible by the Officialdom that encouraged and even tried to mandate them taking this poison.
Chris, you should in the interest of honesty never refer to yourself as a “liberal”, but as Big Brother’s handmaiden.
In cases like this, it is likely a question arose the data was modified outside what was described in the study or other modifications were made that made the study unreproducible. Not uncommon for reasons to not be given until a further investigation is completed. I did look to see if this had been published elsewhere but was unable to locate any source on the topic.
in response to your claim about massive amount of evidence; The NOISE about the vaccine being harmful is massive as there are a lot of people such as J Sobran and yourself who use any taste of negative information to blow out of proportion or misrepresent the analysis all together. Noise is just that….noise, Nothing more.
The idea that the global population of doctors would fully and knowingly recommend a drug that was ‘massively’ harmful is absurd on its face. But to humor your read on the science>
Your idea that science political further indicates your disingenuous approach to truth on this subject given how politics has become a zero-sum games these days.
The truth is far simpler than you claim. The TRUTH is that we know people who are suffering from a wide range of medical issues and that yes, many (most) of those people received a covid vaccine at some point. The error is erroneously linking every health event after the shot, as the result of the shot. Your logic is as absurd as me saying that I ate at a new Italian restaurant and two day later I had a heart attack and blaming the Italian food from the restaurant. Classic correlation and causation mistake.
The article linked showed very clearly the issue with prostate cancer deaths increasing is that hospitals were unable to provide near as much preventive care due to being overrun with covid cases and therefore many more cases than historically normal progressed well beyond the stages where treatment was effective.
That is why we have scientists who construct well designed studies, analyze the data using statistics, and subject their studies to peer review. If your only source is a retracted study, I might suggest you look for further reading on the subject.
I will continue to trust science versus some guy on the internet with no science degree and a strong political bias.
But you be you
What you have been trusting, Chris, is political science.
For all the left’s whining about Trump being a fascist, it is the Democratic far left that would rule with an iron fist. The characteristics of a fascist/totalitarian regime are a government that blatantly lies to its people and a press corps that repeats those lies.
Fascists are the ones that need to discredit science and academics as they can’t afford people questioning their ‘version of the truth’. Science and academics is designed to be questioned as it requires peer review, duplicability etc..
The trend of Trump is to claim fraud or lies without ever being held accountable by his followers (or anyone else) to actually prove fraud or verify any of what he says with actual data or facts. It is a critical step in creating a fascist leadership. The other big step, by the way, is invalidating the rule of law so that only his word is required to lock people up in jails (or in his case, in a foreign jail).
So, stop with the fascist accusations against science. It clearly lacks any basis of truth. Just like your distrust of the jab.
Oh, and by the way, Political science is the study of government, the analysis of political activity and behavior. The study of viruses is the study of virology. What you are doing is called, conspiracy theory.
Well-said, salt life. The left used to pose as socialist, but experience has shown them to love authoritarianism in any form. Now they are at least as fascist as they are socialist (though indeed fascism always encompassed some socialism–National Socialists=Nazi). More on this in reply to Chris.
“The idea that the global population of doctors would fully and knowingly recommend a drug that was ‘massively’ harmful is absurd on its face.”
In earlier days, we worried about medicine becoming socialized. But it collectivized in the other direction. Obamacare put the cherry on top of what is a deeply fascist medical system. 99% of docs are corporate or govt. Protocol-following cogs. Independent thought is quenched. The 1% who thought independently were censored, fired, attacked (not with logic but with punishment), and persecuted.
After the mass of doctors’ performance during the Plandemic, one would have to desperate to trust the amazing intelligence of one’s complex body to the second guessing of these symptom treaters. Medical mistakes are the 3rd leading cause of death according to at least one study.
So emblematic of an authoritarian to sign off with “you be you.” Vouchsafing me permission to be authentic. Arrogance to be expected of Big Brother’s handmaiden.
I certainly trust my doctor more than I trust you, ‘some guy on the internet’ with a loud unqualified opinion.
To be honest it is sad that you believe what you believe. Such distrust that you believe a mass conspiracy only makes me wonder what or who hurt you so bad that you believe thousands of doctors, scientists, and public health officials are conspiring to control you. And for what purpose?
Remember the first sign you are in a cult is that they tell you everyone else is lying.
But you be you.
Chris trusts the very same doctors and scientists who were responsible for the opioid crisis. “The Science” never lets a fact get in the way of a dollar, that’s for sure.
*
All liberals are closet fascists.
Trump is openly fascist.
Only in your sorry little head, Wanker Boy.
More childish name calling by Austin. Yawn.
You’re the only person in these columns I call a wanker, and there are many others here who agree, and also call you “wanker”. So… maybe you’re a wanker.
Doubling down on childish name calling. Classic.
World Health Organization toxicologist Dr. Mustafa Mohd, who was named Top Research Scientist in 2012 by the Malaysian Academy of Science, recently revealed that he was silenced and severely threatened when he blew the whistle on the fraudulence of the Fauci vax. He further stated that the FDA was very involved in the global promotion of the toxic vax, not behaving as a drug regulator but rather a drug pusher.
https://slaynews.com/news/who-toxicologist-blows-whistle-threatened-stay-silent-covid-vaccine-risks/
In the UK, skeptical doctors in the National Health service were threatened with job termination if they merely expressed their skepticism. If that isn’t totalitarianism, what is?
The Trump administration was the actual ‘body’ behind the push for early approval of the covid vaccine at his personal direction to the point he bragged about it.
As for Dr Mustafa Mohd, there is no documented direct quote from him regarding his being silenced and severely threatened. All sources of this story all claim to have received the information from elsewhere so the story is largely unverified. While Dr. Mustafa Mohd did run an important study on the side effects of covid, it’s results are not a secret.
A classic trick of conspiracy theorist is to spread misinformation based on unverified sources (who often don’t even exist). it is a fine line to how mainstream Jounalists use anonymous sources which most conservatives will yell about them being lies because the source won’t go public. Just more hypocrisy from the right.
FYI, here is a link to a study you should read on the misinformation behind covid vaccines: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8115834/
So sad….my life has been reduced to responding to idiots like you. I need to get a life.
No, you’re fine. It’s “Chris” who needs to get a life.
More childish name calling by a conservative. Yawn.
I and my wife avoided the COVID shot like it was the plague. I rarely get the flu shot even though they tell me at my age I should get it regular. Funny thing, I rarely get the flu…go figure
Good for you. It is a personal choice at this stage. I hope it continues to not impact your life.
It’s funny, I used to think I had awful allegories before covid. But after isolating and beginning to work from home, I realized it was just that I received cold viruses from so much business travel and my wife’s job at the local elementary school.
I do miss working in person with people, but I certainly get sick less often. Silver linings.
Is this what it looks like when your entire brain is filled with nothing more than fear, conspiracy theories and victimhood? I recall when the Rhino times had a right lean based on substance and some firmly held beliefs. Now it’s all looney posts about people “suspecting” that someone lied to them or that this word or that thought is being censored — with the common thread being victimhood.
We get it, you were against limiting contact with others to prevent spread of a disease. Who needs a fancy new vaccine when horse paste works just fine. It was a mixed up time that screwed up a lot of lives and a lot of plans, but now what? Is this it? You experienced something that you don’t like and now THAT is what defines you? You’re going to spend the rest of your life complaining about it. For what? To prove that modern medicine lied to you? To be the Monday morning quarterback that proves — you could have managed a global pandemic better? To try to draw a straight line from whatever happens after to your incident of perceived victimhood?
At some point, it’s not the incident of harm that defines you, it’s the “after.”
All the sentences in my letter are factual. You dispute none of them. Indeed, how can you dispute that the medical journals are funded by big Pharma? Or that the study by the NHS finding a tripling of prostate cancer deaths 18 months after the vax is real?
All you do is attempt to mock. The Plandemic was the greatest crime of our lifetimes. The victims of the toxic vax are abandoned by the Officialdom that forced it on them. Those not killed have to live with horrible debility every day. You want us to shut up?
Are you simply a lover of injustice?
What a farrago of fallacies and fabrications, innuendo and baseless character assassination. Are you kin to Chris?