A letter to the editor by Rhino Times reader Alan Burke.
(This is a continuation of Burke’s comments from a previous letter.)

As “Signal Gate” balloons, biased critics look more hostile, irrational, and sheltered than ever.  Cell phones and text messaging are already an unstoppable reality.

There are countless historical examples of failures when traditionalists resist technology.  Initially, military traditionalists feared the security risks of two-way radios.  So, many continued to use pen and paper exclusively.  Radio signals transmit everywhere within a radius.  The entertainment radios of the time could accidentally pick up transmissions.  However, pen and paper also had risks.  Slow couriers could be delayed, intercepted, or killed by the enemy.  The courier could be a spy or otherwise sympathetic to the enemy’s cause.

Germany utilized radios to coordinate the blitzkrieg.  Some French military traditionalists still used couriers despite the advantages of two-way radios.  The occasional farmer did hear German communications on their entertainment radio.  When this happened, I can imagine the traditionalist generals bragging, “This is why we still use couriers.”  They probably patted themselves on their backs until the French government surrendered.

Biased media and politicians are acting like traditionalist French generals.  The “farmer” equivalent in the above example, Jeffrey Goldberg, overheard today’s equivalent of a two-way radio transmission.  To criticize the Trump administration, they now essentially argue for the military to stop using cell phones and text messaging due to “security concerns.”

This is both detrimental and impossible.  Despite risks, texting has greater benefits.  Background noise and other distractions in austere military environments render speaking/hearing over the phone useless.  Therefore, texting is essential for clear, accurate, and timely communication.  Second, landlines have been phased out globally for over a decade.  Future overseas locations will not have landline infrastructure.  Each year, thousands of young adults who have never used a landline enter the military.  Today, texting is a preferred method of communication among this group.  These young adults will become tomorrow’s military leaders.  The military’s use of cell phones and texting is unstoppable.

All levels of the military, spanning multiple presidencies, have already utilized cell phones and text messaging in ways that would apparently shock Jeffrey Goldberg.  Both cell phones and text messaging are required for the modern military.  As a result, the military chain of command has been encouraging the use of “Signal” based on recommendations from cybersecurity experts.  As the controversy grows, the critics amplifying it appear increasingly petty, absurd, and out of touch.