Dems Believe They Are Above The Law
Dear Editor,
Is anybody surprised the White House not only knew about the raid on Trump’s compound, they reportedly authorized it? And is anyone surprised they vehemently denied knowing anything about it, with the exception of Uncle Joe. He’s probably the only one in the WH that can honestly say he didn’t know, and not because of plausible deniability.
My question is are the seized documents currently locked up or is Krem…I mean WH, allowing them to still be reviewed while the warrants are being challenged. And according to the news, at least those reporting on this have said a general warrant was used to conduct this questionable raid. Here is the definition of a general warrant’s scope;
“A general warrant refers to a warrant providing a law-enforcement officer with broad discretion or authority to search and seize unspecified places or persons. A general warrant lacks a sufficiently particularized description of the person or thing to be seized or the place to be searched. General warrants are unconstitutional because they do not meet the Fourth Amendment’s specificity requirements.”
If in fact a general warrant was issued for this search, it’s a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment. Not that matters to the Uncle Joe regime, which doesn’t seem to care about something as minor as those pesky Constitutional rights.
If there are documents and material that were being held by Trump in violation of classified documents laws, there needs to be an accounting, but how this was done is far more egregious.
This, along with the Pelosi case, makes me believe the (National Socialist) Democrat party leadership truly believes they are above any law that would apply to us peasants and would have us tossed under the jail never to be heard from again. Queen Pelosi’s husband got away with not only almost killing someone while drunk, but got away with virtually no punishment and in essence bribing the person he hit by buying them a new car to replace what they lost. And why were both airbags in Pelosi’s car deployed? Who else was in the car and where are they?
Oh, I forgot, the “rules for thee, not for me” applies here because of who it is.
The (National Socialist) Democrat party is moving as fast as they can to get their agenda done before (hopefully) they are thrown out of power.
“A republic, if you can keep it.”
Alan Marshall
More ‘I hate democrats and republicans can do no wrong gibberish’ from Alan.
All reporting shows no evidence the WH had any knowledge of the warrant ahead of Trump releasing his letter announcing the raid. This is because the current administration recognizes the separation of the Executive and Judicial Branches of government. Alan makes the a with no source, no knowledge and no concern for the truth as usual. Just repeats what some other uninformed talking heads says like a good sheep.
How the warrant was issued is well documented in both right wing and left wing media. But apparently Alan thinks himself a constitutional scholar and has ‘discovered’ some hitch in the legal system that all the actual people involved missed. What a joke.
5 days in jail is more than most DUI cases receive but I am not the expert on legal penalty standards like Alan thinks he is. Again…what a joke.
So far, it appears that Trump is the one that believes himself above the law by breaking one of the laws he dragged about making more strict! But Alan defends anyone who claims to be republican cuz you know….anyone that is a Dem is an enemy to Alan. Careful guys…he was in the army and has a conceal carry permit. LOL
“….anyone that is a Dem is an enemy to Alan. Careful guys…he was in the army and has a conceal carry permit.”
Yes Chris, I am retired from the Army and I do have a CCW. So the fact that you disagree with me 99.9% of the time justifies you to apparently covertly encourage someone to do me serious bodily harm, or at least that’s how I read your warning.
Where is there any encouragement of serious bodily harm? C’mon Al. You can’t be THAT dense.
Also, a newspaper not printing a letter is not a violation of your 1st amendment rights (referring to your comment below). Don’t pretend The Rhino has some legal requirement to print anything that is sent to it.
Alan don’t mind him, he’s always on here looking to complain about something. Why he doesn’t go to a more suitable site for his beliefs is beyond me. Free speech he’ll say but in reality he gets his jollies off of arguing with everyone. Be thankful he hasn’t insulted you yet by bringing your gender into the daily rant of his. I agree with your letter and as always it’s well put. As for the above whiner, I guess he’s still upset about someone dropping a house on his sister lol!
The issue is that when you stay in an echo chamber you remain ignorant. Glad to do my duty to avoid letting the Rhino become an echo chamber for misinformation, hate of democrats and over forgiveness of Republicans.
What about the N&R?
Here’s the thing, nobody ever appointed you to carry that “duty”. It’s a self appointed, ego aligned desire to have the last word. Your one desire is to constantly argue with people on here who have like thoughts. You want to appear to be the only one who has an opinion that’s considered correct, all while demeaning others opinions. If the majority here support conservative ideas why do you feel the need to argue? We won’t change and no matter what you try to do we the conservatives have had enough. We’ve been silent long enough and it irritates people now that we’re voicing our opinions. Our opinions are not wrong, they’re just OUR opinions. First Amendment guarantees that we can have one by the way. You have yours and we have ours, so what. I still think you need to find a more appropriate or receiving audience for your mindset. We the people in the conservative party however are not going to stand idly by anymore and let this country get flushed down a proverbial toilet. By all means go ahead now and tell me how awful I am because I support our Constitutional Republic and hate an overreaching government. “This we’ll defend”
I think Nom de plume really knocked it out of the park when describing themselves and really all conservatives with this: “ We won’t change”.
Coupled with their clear fear of even being open to another person’s ideas, they continue to offer this: “I still think you need to find a more appropriate or receiving audience for your mindset.”
This all is evidence that Nom, along with their “we” people are simply not interested in anything but their own ideas. This is a reflection of the modern conservative and of the modern social plague that will lead to more and more dysfunction.
Don’t worry, Nom, if you reply, I may read and listen to what you’ve written because I’m able to formulate opinions and update them.
Not hear to change minds of conservative commentors. Just adding balance to the dialog.
Hear, hear! Well said, Nom de Plume. This ass is gratuitously hostile, shallow in intellect and reasoning, baseless in his character assassination, and vapid and vacuous in his sentiments.
He just thinks he’s smart, and likes to show off his perspicacity – as he perceives it.
But he’s a moron. He believes that if he can cite a source for something, that it must be correct, and ergo, he wins the debate. That’s how deep Chrissy’s intellect is. He swallows everything the Corporate Media tell him is true, parrots it, and thinks he’s a genius.
I feel sorry for him actually. Can you imagine being so stupid that you don’t realise how stupid you are?
There are millions like him. Just watch the “man on the street” interviews on television conducted by conservative journalists. They can’t tell you which ocean is to our East! Or who won World War 2!
Breathtakingly dense Leftists…. like our friend Chris (who falsifies evidence).
Well, MW (who sounds like a lot like Chris) what’s the difference in me saying I won’t change and you saying you won’t? What’s good for the goose is good for the gander isn’t it? If a conservative won’t change their mind then we are wrong, delusional, intolerant, or whatever insult you throw our way. However, if a left leaning or democrat or liberal attacks the conservatives beliefs then they are automatically right. I don’t see a willingness to change in them so what’s your point? Nothing is your point other than to say that guess what buttercup, we are allowed to have our opinions and if we don’t change in order to appease the minority opinions so be it. It’s this kind of mindset that our county was built upon. We take the Constitution as ultimate authority and not the whining of a few. And I keep saying We because yes there are far more of this mindset out there than you know. Learn to live with not everyone praising your ideology. Franklin said, “Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.” So again no I’m not changing my mind and beliefs and values; if you choose not change yours then that’s fine it’s your choice. What’s not fine is you trying to belittle me for having a stand on what I believe. You have yours and I have mine, and that’s just how it is. Again I say the quiet conservatives have had enough. Strap in because it may get bumpy come November.
“hate of democrats and over forgiveness of Republicans.” You mean, hate for republicans and over forgiveness for Democrats?
It works both ways Chris.
LOl, just making fun of how you love to include those two facts in so many of your letters. I think the phrase you like to use is….”you never know if I am carrying”. hahaha what a joke.
But clearly you lack a sense of humor given you hate centered life that requires you to write gibberish to the Rhino on a weekly basis class Democrats all kind of silly names and making accusations without facts or sources.
How about “I hate both Democrats and Republicans!”? That’s exactly how I, and millions of others across this country feel right now. I don’t care what letters are behind their names, if they remain in office too long, it’s inevitable they give in to corruption, and no longer serve their constituents.
Politicians who seek office as a career are what’s wrong with this country, along with those who enable them, and keep voting for their lifetime appointments to whatever position they seek.
Our legislative bodies will never vote for their own term limits, so it’s up to the voters to decide that they’ve been in office long enough, and replace them with someone who isn’t corrupt.
I have began to feel the same way on term limits, as much as I hate to say so.
I agree with Alan. I believe corrupt Democrats only care about gaining more personal wealth, power and control over us, God help us all!
Anyone with a thimble full of brains can see the total muck up over the last 18 months. This of course is planned just like the prior 4 years. This socialist agenda by the Democrats is destroying this country. Hope you are smart enough to vote wisely.
Why on earth does a reputable source of the news continue to publish the almost weekly blather authored by Mr. Alan Marshall? What is his source that the WH “reportedly authorized” the lawfully obtained search warrant requested by the FBI?
Can you not impose some sensible limit on letter writers and entice these folks to stick to Facebook or to create their own blogs? Just sayin’, it’s very annoying to this regular reader. I read the first sentence, typically marked with name-calling and misinformation, scroll to the bottom and confirm the signature. And then move on. Should be an embarrassment to the Rhino Times.
If you don’t appreciate Alan telling us the truth, feel free to read something else. You might even enjoy Greensboro’s own version of Pravda, the Greensboro News and Fishwrap, where you will very rarely encounter any truth or accuracy.
Nothing in is letter is accurate (or sourced for that matter).
The Letters Column of every newspaper is a free speech forum. Of course many of them are blather – there are a lot of stupid people in the World. But if you really prefer controlled and selective debate, you only need turn to Twitter, Facebook, or Pravda.
I prefer open, free and vigorous debate, which is why I love the Rhino.
If you truly believe this, you are so confused on what free speech is, how newspapers make decisions about what to print (or post), or even what a forum is. Bless your heart.
What did I say that’s untrue, Ash Hat?
What did you say that is factual?
Everything. You want to try to refute any of it, or just play cute?
C’mon, what you got?
I tried to, but apparently the free speech forum didn’t allow me to post it. Hmm. Weird.
Oh, please, that’s just pathetic. And untrue.
You have nothing.
You do not have to read anything that is in the letters section. Further, you do not have to read the RT either. We have free speech in the US. You choose to read the RT. If you do not like its contents, then don’t go to the site and read.
B-B-Bingo!!!
Too many people would rather be offended and let everyone know that they’re victims, rather then think for themselves and choose to not be offended. If they read or hear something they don’t agree with, instead of reading or listening to something else, they would rather it be censored, and that no one has the option of reading or listening to it.
Mr. Bretzmann,
First, thank you for having the courage to use your full name.
Second,what you are calling for is called censorship, a clear violation of the 1st Amendment if it were imposed.
Third, I noticed you call me out by name on “…name-calling and misinformation…” but overlook others.
Again, thank you for having the courage to use your full name but I do have a problem with your calling for what is in essence censorship.
Editing is not censorship. What a tool. It is what real journalists do.
CHRIS! Editing is the definition of CENSORING! Your ignorance should be documented. Have an adult contact Guinness! What a Stupid son of a
Wait….you think you think the job of editor is? What an ignorant statement.
Definition of editor: a person who is in charge of and determines the final content of a text, particularly a newspaper or magazine.
Here is an actual definition of censorship:
the suppression or prohibition of any parts of books, films, news, etc. that are considered obscene, politically unacceptable, or a threat to security:
Editing makes sure the writer has sufficient validated sources, facts, and accurately represented the story. They also help with context and basic grammer and spelling. So, for example, someone writes a Letter to the Editor that is factually incorrect, an editor can elect to not print that letter and encourage the writer to provide more in the form of source etc…. Given that people mix opinion with facts these days thanks to people like Trump, it is even more messy but that is for a different time.
Chris, soooooo, you had to go to the dicots basically prove me right. Thanks!
The republic has been taken from us. We live in a corrupt oligarchy.
And who do you think the US oligarchs are? They are republicans most certainly.
And what do you say about the Clinton’s who claimed to be broke when they left office yuk yuk or the Obamas who own a 12 mil+ estate in the Hamptons or the Bidens and their multiple million dollar deals that Hunter made or the Pelosis and all their millions. I don’t think they are REPUBLICANS Just to name a few Enjoy numbnuts
Comon Chris I gave you some examples of American oligarchs in charge of America that are not REPUBLICANS what no response.
A General Warrant is carte blanche for the police to raid your home and go on a fishing expedition.
And that’s just what they did to Trump.
This country’s turning into a South American tin pot dictatorship, courtesy of the Biden regime. Alan’s right, these people are latter day National Socialists (Nazis).
Or maybe…just maybe…it was something that Trump could have avoided by following the law and returning ALL documents as formally requested by the Federal Archives in accordance with the law Trump himself strengthened. Maybe…just maybe, Trump’s lawyers shouldn’t have signed off saying that all documents had been return (which is admitting that they SHOULD have been returned) when in fact many document had NOT been returned.
Or do you think Trump should be above the law?
“Maybe…. maybe…. maybe…..” – What a weak argument, even by your standards.
Awwww….somebody lacks humor. Not shocked.
Your comments are definitely humorous.
Everyone laughs at them.
CHRIS, you obviously do not have any ability to comprehend plain ENGLISH. You replied not once but TWICE! And both times you validated my statements. All of them… DUMBASS! You really are a LIBTARD. What a stupid son of a bitch! If a I may borrow a line from Dopey Joe…
Oh, Alan you are HI-larious !! Your letters often give me my best laugh of the day !! You’re a lot of yuck for the buck. And they call Dems “snowflake” !! Never change, Barbara. The chickens are coming home to roost, and the Repub’s squirming is such delicious entertainment.
I honestly appreciate your response. I also agree that the First Amendment guarantees freedom of speech, as you suggest. And please understand that by “name calling,” I was not suggesting that individuals should not be named. Thus, my full name. I was stating that you frequently resort to derisive nick-names that diminish your objectivity.
My issue is that, contrary to a comment above, you are NOT “telling the truth” when you spew misinformation as the basis of your conclusions. And the First Amendment does NOT require the Rhino to publish your letters every week. It gives YOU the right to publish them.
I’m a registered Independent and consider myself a moderate progressive. I would say the same thing about a liberal should they repeatedly write letters with blatant misinformation and “name calling.”
Suggestion: Watch something other than Fox. At least one of their commentators defended a defamation lawsuit by claiming the his viewers should know he is spewing misinformation.
Fox is too mainstream and progressive for Alan and this bunch. Seriously, if they would actually watch Fox News – the news part, not the flappy head *ucker *arlton – they would all be so much ch better informed.
Fox is becoming just as corrupt and useless as the rest of the news/misinformation networks.
Mr. Bretzmann,
I do in fact watch and read other news sources. I try to do as much comparison as I can. I personally have found Fox and a couple of other sources come the closest to the facts. Note I said the closest. And I will admit they don’t always tell it all but compared to some others they come the closest to giving the more and accurate information.
I would like to remind you of the story about involvement of Trump in deals with Russia from other news sources implying the POTUS was possibly committing borderline treason.
As for the “derisive nick-names” that is my way of expressing my contempt for those that hold a public office and yet act as if they only work for selected political parties with (in some cases) agendas contrary to what is best for America overall. (My opinion)
And also I would like to point out I have occasionally called out R’s and D’s for their lack of concern for Americans in general.
And if the commentator you are referring to is who I believe it to be, I do not always agree with him and in some cases really get irritated at his position.
I would ask Mr. Marshall what he would have done to retrieve the last boxes of documents from Mar-A-Lago since he tells us it could have been done in a better manner. I mean this just as a straight up factual question not as some sort of snide comment. I would be interested in what other manner he would suggest being used to retrieve the documents that might have been more satisfactory to all parties involved.
Mr. Jordan,
I would have used every LEGITIMATE legal option that would have allowed me to make sure it could not be challenged. A general warrant, from what I have been able to find out about them, was not the way. Based on the definition and legal description a general warrant is basically look anywhere for anything. Why was not a more specific warrant done outlining what was being searched for? And as for the Melania’s closet search, I think that was a legit area to be searched considering what they were looking for.
They did use all other legal means. They even formal signed a legal document stating that all documents had been returned. Which was a lie. So boom warrant.
The “Chris Wars” are fun to read. 1st amendment lives, but without filters. Some of what is said here would not be repeated face to face.
John Hammer doesn’t have the stones to run a reputable enough paper that actually holds people accountable for what they say. Plus we’d find out it’s just Alan, Chris, or Austin and their 15 split personalities on here all day while collecting disability from their mom’s basement.
I’m Austin, I use that name only, I own a successful direct sales small business, I’m an immigrant who’s lived the American Dream, and I have paid a ton in taxes to State, Federal & Local in 39 years without ever receiving a dime.
So you can spare us your groundless character assassination, “Daddy”. All it proves is that you have a febrile imagination – and a nasty personality.
Prove it.
All true, whether you believe it or not ( and the Editor can vouch for most of it ).