The following is from Rhino Times Reader Patrick Henry
It’s obvious how far the Left (aka the Democrat Party) is willing to go to destroy America. A sitting judge, a person who’s supposed to be neutral, a person who’s responsible for keeping our society from falling into chaos decided she knows better than the law who and should not be held accountable based on her personal beliefs.
A judge in Wisconsin tried to distract federal LEOs then directed and assisted the accused, an illegal alien, to flee the courthouse to avoid capture. On top of this, people protested her arrest and demanded she be released and returned to the bench.
These actions go far beyond legislating from the bench. This is a judge deciding which laws should and should not be enforced based on personal beliefs. This is a judge who sees her courtroom as her personal fiefdom. Additionally, there was a judge, who stepped down, that housed and protected an illegal in his house knowing he was illegal. You have Democrat lawmakers…LAWMAKERS…on video interfering with ICE officers. Not just interfering, but physically assaulting officers, trying to interfere in their duties and attempting to forcibly enter the facility. It’s one thing to show up for an unannounced inspection, it’s another to join a mob trying to break in. And by the way, after one of them was shown around the facility they stated everything was fine and was, in fact, impressed with the conditions inside.
The Democrat Party, and in particular the (National Socialist) Democrat wing of the party is struggling to TRY to make themselves relevant again because they believe if things keep going the way they are, they will be in the wilderness for some time to come.
To TERMLIMITS, I want to say I have changed my stance and agree with you. We need to get rid of these ‘professional politicians’ and return the power of the government back to We the People as called for in the 10th Amendment.
First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
—Martin Niemöller
Patrick Henry
Weird. One judge does something fully independent of her role and Alan attempts to frame this as a liberal conspiracy. Of course, he does this while ignoring his party’s lack of respect for the rule of law as Trump now claims that SCOTUS is out to get him! The most conservative court in decades rules against him and yet Trump still to claims he should be allowed to do whatever he wants in spite of the laws that protect individual rights in this great country. All while people like Alan make up pretend conspiracies about Liberals wanting to destroy America while he sits by cheering on his dear leader destroying faith in our systems of democracy, due process of law, free speech and individual rights. Typical conservative hypocrisy.
From where I sit, it is the conservative party that is working hard to destroy all that makes this country great, so they feed their greed for money and power.
But you be you
Chris I just saw where the government is settling with
Ashley Babbits family for 5 million for her wrongful murder
Can’t wait to hear what you have to say about this
Its awesome you are excited for my response.
No one on the left is surprised. The reward payment was directed by Trump. You know the guy that pardoned Jan 6 people that physically attacked Capitol police.
I case you forgot, these are people Trump thinks are heros:
– **David Nicholas Dempsey**: stomped on officers’ heads, attacked with flagpoles, sprayed bear spray into an officer’s gas mask
– **Peter Schwartz**: threw a chair at officers, used pepper spray against them
– **Daniel Joseph “DJ” Rodriguez**: held a stun gun to Officer Fanone’s neck, attacked with a fire extinguisher and wooden pole
– **Christopher Joseph Quaglin**: choked and tackled Officer Fanone, struck officers with metal bike racks, stolen shields, pepper spray
– **Thomas Webster**: struck an officer with a flagpole, tackled him to the ground
– **Christopher J. Worrell**: sprayed police officers with pepper spray
– **Thomas Harlen Smith**: kicked an officer in the back, hit officers in the head with a metal pole
– **Albaquerque Cosper Head**: dragged Officer Fanone face-first down the West Terrace steps, joined assaults at the tunnel entrance
– **Kyle J. Young**: handed a stun gun to Rodriguez, grabbed Officer Fanone’s hand during the attack
– **Patrick McCaughey III**: used a stolen riot shield to crush Officer Daniel Hodges in a doorframe
– **Steven Cappuccio**: ripped off Officer Hodges’s gas mask, struck him with his own baton
– **Andrew Taake**: attacked officers with bear spray and a metal whip
So no, not surprised a POS like Trump would pay off a person who broke through a window of a barricaded door and ignored multiples calls to stop by the Capitol police officer.
So much for the party that beleives in justice.
First they came for the illegal immigrants and they all cheered
Then they ignored the rights of legal immigrants and no one spoke out
Then they came for the refugees, and no one spoke out
Then they came for the foreign national students, and no one spoke out
Then they came for citizen children, and no one spoke out
Then they came for any citizen they didn’t ‘like’….
But you be you
Childish…so childish
Maybe you’re next.
Read a great take on why rule of law matters.
If you are ok with gang members being sent off to foreign prisons without due process, then you are giving up YOUR freedom. As what is to stop anyone of accusing YOU of being gang member. You will yell you aren’t a gang member, but the police will just say prove it and yet you will have no where to present your case. Off to prison you go Assuie.
Just a little difference in your argument Chris. I’m here LEGALLY and I’m an American citizen everyone who was sent away were here ILLEGALLY
How do you prove it if not allowed a day in court? Duh. Using the Trump approach, all it takes is one person anywhere in the power system to make the accusation and you are assumed guilty. It is the cornerstone of how fascism works. And you seem to be in support of it.
Weird.
Have one less cup of coffee in the morning and you’ll feel better. Your posts aren’t the problem. . . it’s your responses that tells me you have an angry streak that needs to be toned down. It goes with the old saying. . .”It is better to be thought of as a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”
Lighten up Chris, and you may start a good discussion.
Yet another reader commenting on how angry and spiteful you, are, Chrissy.
Joe,
Oooooooh another conservative who doesn’t like my pointing out the hollow nature of conservative positions. What will I ever do. Lmao
It is no secret that Trump indeed makes me angry and his ability to sucker his cult into being ok with his destroying what actually makes America great makes me even more angry everyone i hear thr spewing of misinformation, factually incorrect comments and hollow baseless accusations. I dont pretend to beleive MAGA types like many here will ever listen to a rationale point of view or have a civilized discussion. I am happy to tone down my anger if anyone on the conservative side has any real interest in engaging in civil debate using facts, data and respect for experts in their field but that doesn’t happen here often.
Best wishes
Chris I have my NC drivers license with the Real ID star on it. I’d be willing to bet most if not all of those deported can say that. L
Ridiculous argument. Democrats have poisoned their own Well with no end in sight. Indictments are just down the road and the charges will be legitimate.
Oh we believe in rule of law now?
LMAO, i thought this letter was written by Alan. My apologies Alan. Looks like Patrick has copied your writing style. Imitation is the greatest form of flattery.
I proudly admit I participated in it’s writing. He gets the credit for all the big words.
And for the record Chris, he’s my brother from a different mother, something only another ‘been there, done that, got the scars’ person would understand.
Your weird. That statement is actually very easy to understand. Good for you two.
WANKER
———
Wow !
Three – count ’em — THREE comments by our Village Idiot, before anyone else gets a single comment posted.
“Professor Chris” needs to get a life. Or a job. Or a brain.
When you’re commenting about your own comments – without anyone else having commented – you are unequivocally, indisputably, unarguably….. A Wanker.
A pathetic intellectual onanist who just likes the sound of his own voice.
Drone on, buddy.
Loser.
Austin,
Be careful using the term ‘wanker’. You may get edited because of it’s meaning.
Last year I did take it out again and again, but it is Austin’s favorite word and I got tired of fighting it.
Sorry Scott. But if the cap fits….
Would tosser be better? Or onanst?
Anyway, Rebel loves the term too !
Scott,
Please be careful…you’re bordering on double standards, something the liberals love to do.
Scott,
I see…
merde
Je ne comprends pas. Qu’est-ce merde?
Weird thing to rant about.
But you be you
I’m guessing Chris was too busy looking after his “petty criminals and ILLEGALS “ to actually read the byline
I was just about to say the same thing, Austin. I’m pretty sure he thinks he has never been wrong in any of his commentary too.
You’re right Don, he’s never admitted being mistaken about anything, any time. Wait – I take that back. He once wrote a letter to The Rhino apologizing for calling me a racist and withdrawing the smear.
He had no evidence for his character assassination, and when challenged repeatedly, he did admit to being wrong. It was a couple of years ago.
I guess that’s the exception that proves the rule.
You really are thin skinned to still be bringing this up after how many years?
For the record, since you are still bringing this up, I mistook a quote from Rebel as being from you. So, yes, I apologized for the mischaracterization at the time. LOL, but that was before you went on your rant falsely claiming that people from Africa are genetically less intelligent than Europeans and always dodge the important question if you consider that false claim applies to African Americans. Not to mention your bigotry against LGBTQ people (claiming that calling deviants isn’t a slur) or your bigotry against immigrants (which is kinda the norm now to be a conservative).
But you be you.
Glad you’ve confirmed that you erroneously labelled me a racist, and were forced to apologize and retract the smear.
The rest of your character assassinations are equally false.
You need to get over your hatred for me, and accept that I can – and do- regularly make you look foolish. Hey, nobody’s forcing you to debate in these columns. If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen….
PS
I don’t rant – but you certainly do. Get a life, buddy.
If not concerned, go ahead and answer the questions: When you falsely claim African’s are genetically less intelligent that Europeans, does you include African Americans in that false claim?
But yes, your referral of LGBTQ qualifies you as a bigot hands down. The above questions will address the question of racism that I assume is a key part of your character. So…answer the question.
Africans have an average IQ that is significantly lower than Europeans. Fact. Google it yourself, any way you like.
Chris, typical liberal – can’t deal with the truth. And acknowledging reality doesn’t make you a bigot, no matter how hard you try to denigrate and excoriate people who are capable of accepting reality.
Leftists imagine the World as they wish it to be (its a kind of mental illness).
Rightists see the World as it is.
——
And it appears that you’re the one who can’t let go of past discussions. You lost the debate. Get over it.
I did Google it amd the only reference to it was mostly white nationalist promoting a long ago debunked study.
Gemini AI results sumarries it well. (But we know you prefer your personal bias to experts.) Seems lole you are very selective of which Google results you choose to read and beleive. Hmmmmm….wonder why
The consensus among scientists is that there is no genetic basis for differences in average IQ scores between racial groups. While differences in average IQ scores have been observed between populations, these differences are overwhelmingly attributed to environmental factors, not genetics.
Here’s a breakdown of the key points:
* Race as a Social Construct: Modern science, particularly in genetics and anthropology, views “race” primarily as a social construct rather than a biological reality. Genetic variation is much greater within so-called racial groups than between them.
* Environmental Factors are Key: Numerous environmental factors are known to influence IQ scores, and these factors often differ significantly between populations. These include:
* Socioeconomic Status (SES): Access to quality education, nutritious food, healthcare, and enriching environments are strongly linked to cognitive development.
* Nutrition: Adequate nutrition, especially during early childhood, is crucial for brain development. Malnutrition can lead to cognitive delays.
* Education: The quality and availability of educational resources, early childhood education programs, and stimulating learning environments play a significant role.
* Healthcare: Access to good healthcare, including prenatal care, can impact cognitive outcomes.
* Cultural Factors: The emphasis placed on education, different learning styles, and exposure to different types of knowledge can also influence test performance.
* “Flynn Effect”: This refers to the observed rise in average IQ scores over generations in many parts of the world, which is widely attributed to environmental improvements (like better nutrition, education, and health).
* No “IQ Gene” Linked to Race: Extensive genetic research has not identified any genes or sets of genes that explain group differences in intelligence based on racial categories.
* History of Misuse: Claims of inherent differences in intelligence between races have been central to the history of scientific racism and have been widely debunked.
Your comment about “people from Africa are genetically less intelligent than Europeans” brings up a good question. Could it be the intelligent people are the ones who are controlling their societies and not providing pathways to success by their so-called “leaders”?
You also seem to not take time in writing your posts after careful review such as. . .”or your bigotry against immigrants (which is kind of the norm now to be a conservative.)
I’m not against migrants, however opening up our borders to anyone and everyone would tank our economy. And bigotry is more than likely in the eyes of the beholder. And as you say . . . but you be you.
The Trump administration has deported refugees, children of immigrants who are citizens, blocked future refugees except for white refugees from S. Africa, and famously deported immigrants who had protected status in direct violation of court orders, and lastly has deported legal visa holding students due to nothing more than social media posts and now because they attend a university he doesn’t like.
So, unless you stand against those above actions, you can’t say you aren’t against immigrants and only against open borders. If you support Trumps actions against legal immigrants and refugees, you ARE against immigrants in general. Especially those of color it seems.
But you be you.
——————-
Google : Average IQ of Africans and Europeans. Among the top answers is : “Average IQ in Africa is 75; in Europe it’s 96”, among literally dozens of others.
Or Google “The Most Intelligent Countries”, or whatever. The answer is always the same – because it’s true, and undeniably true.
This guy “Chris” twists and distorts truth. His sly deceptions often appear innocent or benign. But those who lie and deceive are never benign. In this instance he’s lying because he’s chomping at the bit to declare you a racist, and therefore morally inferior (to him). But here’s the thing : I readily acknowledge that Europeans are less intelligent than Northern Orientals – because it’s true. So when he starts talking about “White Nationalism” it’s completely baseless, and another one of his lies. It’s just another smear he’s trying on.
By his logic, I am a “Japanese Nationalist”. The Japanese are highly intelligent, more so than Europeans.
And these are the contortions you get into when you refuse to accept truth and reality.
He lies.
All. The. Time.
CHRIS : “The consensus among scientists is that there is no genetic basis for differences in average IQ scores for racial groups”.
UNTRUE . There is a huge debate among scientists about this, which is often condensed as “Nature versus Nurture”. The former is your DNA, the latter is your environment.
The liberal scientists say we’re all exactly equal and it’s just about schooling and parenting.
The conservative scientists say that that is primarily your DNA that determines your IQ.
Whichever side you believe, it is definitely NOT A CONSENSUS.
This guy Chris is a bit of a nutcase, huh?
Austin, google why one community or culture has different IQ levels and you will notice that the answer isn’t genetics.
Access to quality nutrition is the top correlation and causation identified. Especially in the early years of child development.
The second top caused correlated to brain development in children is parasitic infections.
(Diarrheal ones are the gravest threat—they can prevent the body from getting any nutrients at all for example)
Access to early childhood education has an impact as well (although to a lessor direct correlation as a root cause).
So I don’t disagree that third world countries have lower average IQs. It is your false claim (long debunked by numerous studies) that it is genetic. THAT is the racist trope that White Nationalist, the KKK, etc… have used for pushing their racist propaganda. Funny how your google searches didn’t find this information….or did you CHOOSE to ignore any studies or articles that didn’t support your racist views?
So again. Your false claim that Africans are genetically less intelligent is a sound justification for labeling you a racist.
But go ahead and answer the real qualifying question….do you believe your false claim that Africans are genetically less intelligent than Europeans apply to African Americans? That will by itself clear any question my labeling you as a racist.
Note, I didn’t confirm that I erroneously labeled you a racist. I erroneously credited you for making a racist comment made by another frequent commenter here on the Rhino Times. I had always suspected you had a strong leaning to racist views but until you fought for this long-ago debunked idea of genetics driving differences in IQs between ethnic groups, I avoid laying on the label until now.
But you be you. You seem so proud of your racist view, own it and answer THE question.
Al Hare i have found no evidence of an active debate in the scientific community on the genetic origin of IQ between ethnic groups.
Any sources?
Chris, you DID erroneously smear me as a racist – that’s why you wrote the letter to this publication apologizing to me. This is just a matter of fact.
My God, you lie and twist and misrepresent everything, and then complain about “conservative misinformation”.
You are the biggest source of misinformation and mendacity in these columns.
Austin, so we are cleae today.
You are a racist and a bigot.
Your long history of comments makes that very clear.
Hope thst helps clear up Amy misunderstanding about how I think of you.
Na, I have made mistakes before and appreciate it when folks point them out.
“Na, I have made mistakes before and appreciate it when folks point them out.”…so I can then belittle them and call them childish names.
But I’ll be me.
Says to guy who belittles and calls names to those who have different political opinions. Typical hypocrisy from Alan. Yawn.
Ok Chris Austin answered your question. What have you got to say now
I don’t see him doing anything but repeating the racist lie that Africans genetically have a lower IQ than Europeans. And he specifically has NOT answered the real question of does his racist lie apply to African Americans. Or did he answer it in another thread?
*
It’s not a lie that Africans have a lower IQ than Europeans. It’s the truth.
You just can’t handle the truth.
*
You really are daft. Your reading comprehension skill are horrendous. Not to mention to avoid the real failure of your argument that supports your racist ideals. You claim it is genetics that are the reason some ethnic groups in Africa have lower iQ. Your only source is a long ago debunked study. And you ignore all the other real studies that have data showing a range of childhood development issues as the real source of poor intellectual development of children in many third world countries.
You are a good little soldier of the white nationalist movement at your core. Just man up and own it.
If you believe:
that LeBron James should be allowed to play in the WNBA, that government spending should be an all-you-can-eat buffet, that the pronouns they/them refers to one person, that enjoying sipping margaritas with MS-13 gangbangers is a good time, that dictionaries should change the definition of “illegal” to meaning it isn’t forbidden by law, that defining a woman is someone would could have functional manhood, that Visas don’t have expiration dates, that say In Dr. Fauci We Trust, that abortions are central to a woman’s life, that the Hunter laptop story is still fake news, that diversity and equity includes everyone, and that low income families don’t have the wherewithal to obtain IDs.
You might be a far-left lunatic.
If you believe Trump’s crypto coin isn’t a scam to fleece US policy for his personal financial gain, that climate change is a conspiracy to control you, that mass fraud is why Trump lost the 2020 election, that gender and sex are the same thing, that Jared received 3 billion in investments because he is ‘just a good guy’, that children fleeing Latin American death squads pose a dire threat to American safety, that foreign countries pay tariffs, that refugees eat pets, that Mexico was going to pay for the wall, that hard working American’s can’t be poor and need federal assistance, that Canada should be a US State, that the ‘rule of law’ doesn’t apply if you agree with the person violating the law, that teaching true racial history of America is a plot to make white children feel sad, that LGBTQ people are a danger to children, that healthcare isn’t a right, that Government has no right to regulate pollution or protect consumers or protect labor rights, that conservatives are fiscally responsible, and being a bully is how to be a good negotiator and leader.
You might be a MAGA far right idiot.
Chris please show me anywhere in the Constitution that health care is a right guaranteed by our government
Tom,
Well said sir!
You guys are weird. Where did i say health was a right governed by the constitution. Given America’s long history is tying health insurance to employment and health care requiring insurance to receive fair pricing of care, it clearly isn’t a constitutional right.
It’s a human right. Not a constitutional right. But I fully understand how conservative don’t believe in human rights. Heck, you don’t even seem to believe in the constitution any longer.
You two should go back and study reading comprehension.
But you be you.
Your reply as one sentence tells us (me) you’re in need of some help, not mentally (although some on this site might disagree with me), but in how you write your replies. It tells me (us) your responses almost seem to be on automatic and more related to venting your anger at anyone who disagrees with you without a thoughtful reply to enhance your views or opinions.
As the Beatles once said. . .”Let It Be”
Na, it is my anger at conservative’s love of misinformation, lies and ignorance. Especially their anti-science misinformation, lies about election fraud, lies about DEI, lies about schools indoctrinating children, lies about immigrants being criminals versus a hardworking part of our economy, lies about liberals wanting to destroy America, and now their support of violating due process of law, running up deficit spending to give tax cuts to wealthy, and the absurd idea that tariffs (ie global trade war) won’t hurt our economy.
Oh and toss in the big lie about conservative being Christians although they have no empathy for the poor.
That is what motivates my comments.
*
No Chris, everybody here can see what kind of person you are – and nobody likes what they see.
You’re an asshole.
Go DONALD J TRUMP
Austin do you really beleive i have any care in world if I am liked by a bunch of hateful conservatives? Weird you would think I would care about that given how I so strongly disagree with most of your personal and political opinions.
Call me names all you want. It really only makes you look childish. Sure I am guilty of being childish here as well with my choice of wording as well. I am just not stupid enough to think you care.
But you be you.
Here’s the fact: No judge can tell the President how to conduct foreign policy. Period.
If he breaks US law (in this case the constitution) in attempting to conduct foreign policy, they sure can. For example, the Constitution divides foreign policy powers between the President and Congress, creating a system of checks and balances. While the President has the primary authority to conduct foreign policy, Congress also has significant influence, including the power to declare war, ratify treaties, and appropriate funds for foreign policy initiatives.
Chris,
So you say he is violating the law and the Constitution when conducting foreign affairs, Yet the Constitution says “Section 1. Purpose. Article II of the United States Constitution vests the power to conduct foreign policy in the President of the United States.”
So which is it Chris?
Read my comment again Patrick. I didn’t say he was violating law (notice the word at the start…”if”.
I just noted that there are checks and balances on foreign policy powers as with most other authority granted by the constitution.
Certainly, the most important authority given to Congress overall is the power to declare war and to raise and support the armed forces. The authority is granted in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 11 of the U.S. Constitution.
Article I of the Constitution also grants several of Congress’s foreign affairs powers, including those to “regulate commerce with foreign nations,” “declare war,” “raise and support armies,” “provide and maintain a navy,” and “make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces.” The Constitution also makes two of the president’s foreign affairs powers—making treaties and appointing diplomats—dependent on Senate approval.
Beyond these, Congress has general powers—to “lay and collect taxes,” to draw money from the Treasury, and to “make all laws which shall be necessary and proper”—that, collectively, allow legislators to influence nearly all manner of foreign policy issues. For example, the 114th Congress (2015–2017) passed laws on topics ranging from electronic surveillance to North Korea sanctions to border security to wildlife trafficking. In one noteworthy instance, lawmakers overrode President Barack Obama’s veto to enact a law allowing victims of international terrorist attacks to sue foreign governments.
Congress also plays an oversight role. The annual appropriations process allows congressional committees to review in detail the budgets and programs of the vast military and diplomatic bureaucracies. Lawmakers must sign off on more than a trillion dollars in federal spending every year, of which more than half is allocated to defense and international affairs. Lawmakers may also stipulate how that money is to be spent. For instance, Congress repeatedly barred the Obama administration from using funds to transfer detainees out of the military prison at Guantanamo Bay.
Congress has broad authority to conduct investigations into particular foreign policy or national security concerns. High-profile inquiries in recent years have centered on the 9/11 attacks, the Central Intelligence Agency’s detention and interrogation programs, and the 2012 attack on U.S. diplomatic facilities in Benghazi, Libya.
Furthermore, Congress has the power to create, eliminate, or restructure executive branch agencies, which it has often done after major conflicts or crises. In the wake of World War II, Congress passed the National Security Act of 1947, which established the CIA and National Security Council. Following the 9/11 attacks, Congress created the Department of Homeland Security.
The courts are brought in anytime one side disagrees with how the other has interpreted their own role versus the other in foreign policy matters.
Hope that helps.
Patrick I’m betting Chris has never read the Constitution.
Rebel,
Reading it is one thing, comprehending it is another.
Says the goof that believes the other branches of government don’t have a roll in foreign policy. LMAO
CHRIS : ” a roll in foreign policy”… ??
Is it a Swiss Roll? LMAO!
PS
How do you make a Swiss Roll? Push him down an Alp.
I prefer Tuna rolls.
It’s ROLE Chris, not ROLL. Once again, you cannot call people goofs and dummies if you don’t know the meanings of the basic words you use. You come off as an idiot who thinks he’s a genius. But I guess that is your role here, so carry on.
You got it in one, Timmy !
Oh no! I made a typo. Lol. Big deal.
It certainly is a big deal when you are questioning other people’s intelligence. And you don’t make the occasional typo. You do them in almost every post and sometimes to an extent that makes the post incoherent. You say you take all this time to do detailed research yet cannot be bothered to reread your own work even once?
As my father always said, if you want to be taken seriously, your work needs to look like you take is seriously.
Nope. My typo doesn’t make you any less wrong in your comment. Weird you think it would.
But you be you.
Reading this thread, I’m agreeing with Timmy. This guy “Chris” shows off like he’s some kind of genius, but his comments are like a little kid’s – and pissy towards other people too.
I think he’s a jerk. Sorry, but it’s true.
It’s weird so many claim I show off as a ‘genius’, ‘thinks he is really smart’, etc…
To be clear, I don’t consider myself exceptionally bright. I am just a dyslexic guy who lacks attention span to always proofread my comments. The big difference is that I try my best for formulate my responses with data, facts, and openly use experts as sources when structuring my responses much of the misinformation, hollow comments, and blatant lies often commented here in the Rhino Times comment section.
Give it a try sometime.
Good News: Delaware Gov. Matt Meyer, a Democrat, signed legislation on Tuesday legalizing physician-assisted suicide.
Liberals have long supported physician-assisted suicide (except maybe the catholic liberals).
Death with dignity should be considered a human right. (Tom and Patrick, note I didn’t say a contitutional right – LMAO).
I agree. Doesn’t Biden live in Delaware?
At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child — miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic, and useless. —P. J. O’Rourke
* Describes Chris, doesn’t it?
I really am deep in your head given how you can’t help but comment about me allllllllll the time.
Pot calling the kettle black.
You take a swipe at me even on articles where I made no comments ! Austin Morris is living in your head – rent free !
Lol I dont think there are many if any articles where you and I dont both chime in. Seems to be a hobby for the both of us.
I never mention you under articles in which you have not commented.
You are irrelevant.
Look up that definition in the dictionary and you will find a picture of Chris
Same picture under the definition of Wanker
Guess which word your picture shows up under….lmao
Just a few things Democrats oppose:
*The most significant tax cut in history.
*Strong border security.
*Protecting Medicaid for American citizens who “need it.”
*Pay raises for the military.
*Ending taxpayer-funded trans-mutilation.
*Updating air traffic control systems.
*American energy dominance.
Never trust a conservative speaking about what liberals beleive.
What democrats actually believe:
Tax cut that only adds to the federal deficit. Damn straight i oppose it. Seems the bond market considers it a bad idea as well given the spike in rates.
We beleive in border security. Just one that includes due process of law. Heck we even actually worked to improve the law versus fighting to ignore the law.
More misinformation by conservstives who actually receive medicaid. Liberals just are not stupid enough to beleive the lies.
Military spending is too high now that wars have ended and cold war is over. Trump cut what actually matered for our defense such as his cutting of cyber security spending.
Liberals have long supported updating airtraffic systems. But NOT cutting already short staffed controllers.
The future of energy dominance is in clean energy which has all been cut by Trump. Under Biden, more oil was drilled.than any other time in history. But going back to coal is just stupid. There is no such thing as clean coal
Bollocks.
Too much there for you to counter with a real comment Austin? Typical Austin response when he knows I am right.
“Christian Rice”?
Upon closer examination, it becomes apparent that the Democratic Party, particularly Obama and Pelosi, played a significant role in shaping the outcomes of Trump’s electoral victories in 2016 and 2024.
Obama and Pelosi’s delayed intervention in convincing Biden to withdraw from the 2024 race left the Democratic Party with a candidate who, many argue, was a step back from Hillary Clinton, the most disliked political person in the country. Obama convinced Biden not to run in 2016 and said Hillary was the only person who could beat Trump. Republicans should appreciate these two folks’ contributions toward Making America Great Again.
It was widely known within Democratic circles that Biden was unfit for office: mentally and physically. However, the party leadership refused to invoke the 25th Amendment, which would have allowed the selection of a more suitable candidate than Harris. This failure to act left the party with an incompetent nominee, ultimately contributing to Trump’s return to the White House.
And a big thanks to Joe, who endorsed Harris for president. Biden put the DEI party in a box, and they couldn’t turn their back on a Black female.
Speaking of Biden, why would anybody create such a terrible act against their own country as Biden did with open borders? This is the worst act from a president in my lifetime. Biden deliberately destroyed the border, jeopardizing our national security. He let in 15 million illegal aliens and never once checked their backgrounds, a grave injustice that continues to have serious consequences.
It will be impossible to find, arrest, and deport all the illegal criminals let into our country, and the ones they do find may be let go by liberal DAs or judges.
If for no other reason, Biden will go down as the worst president in history for his open border policies.
Given Trumps aggressive efforts to bankrupt America and weaken our dominant global economic position, he is making a stronger run to go down as the worst of all time.
Just look at his approval ratings. Even with his cult follower blind allegiance, he has the worst approval rating for any president within their first 100 days. (Note he is both worst and second worst in this metric)
Data hurts doesn’t it.
But you be you
Yeah, and the polls and surveys said Harris would win by a landslide. So you be you and believe his numbers are down.
What polls did ypu read that said that? They showed her tied ie trailing in most all of the swing states. Sure some polls had her up in the popular vote but that means nothing in our system.
As Democrats like to say “No one is above the law,” unless you are a liberal judge or Democratic Congress person.
Judge Dugan helped an illegal immigrant escape ICE agents. Rep. LaMonica McIver assaulted ICE agents.
Trump directly ignored a direct order from SCOTUS. So hard to claim Conservstives have any respect for the rule of law.
Is that all you have…..Whataboutisms?
We’ve had to continuously watch “Weekend at Bernie’s “for four years.”
I feel sad for anyone battling cancer, but in Joe’s case, he should be getting treatment at a prison hospital.
Yet another example of hypocrisy by a conservstive who has complained about the weaponizng the courts (falsely i might add), yet now wants his dear leaders dying opponent locked up in prison for what? Notice the absence of any comment abkut a crime.
Classic conservstive.