The following is a letter to the editor from Rhino Times reader Alan Burke.

True defense of the world’s “starving children”

The majority of Americans support USAID under two conditions:

  • It sticks to funding basic food/water, infrastructure, health (immunizations, antibiotics, antiretrovirals, and maternal health), and education (math, science, and reading) during international humanitarian assistance,
  • Domestic spending on social security, Medicare/Medicaid, VA health, and FEMA isn’t risked.

              USAID’s entire purpose is to fund essential health in impoverished areas.  The UN recently acknowledged that Africa depends on USAID for antiretrovirals. However, USAID diverted limited resources, tax dollars, to promote unproven extremist political agendas.   In order to finance extremist ideological expenditures, other projects/priorities were sacrificed.  How many more children and mothers could have been fed, clothed, educated, and healed if the money was spent as voters intended?  Bureaucratic mismanagement is directly responsible for any child starved.

It’s also to blame for the resulting scrutiny.  DNC politicians are making ridiculous pseudo-legal arguments. Yes, the legislature guaranteed USAID funds for essential international outreach (see above).  They argue Trump is a tyrant for “dismantling USAID” and stopping spending without Congress.  However, Trump cut only biased ideology expenditures and reorganized under the State Department.  The money allotted by previous administrators for food, etc., will continue.  If there isn’t enough food being distributed, the bureaucrats canceled it years ago to prioritize personal ideology.  The more significant issue that should concern Congress (both parties) is that USAID lied by omission.  They confidently diverted taxpayer money because we assumed it would feed starving children.  They knew that if they overspent, they could emotionally blackmail us into giving more.  They knew that if they were caught, they would accuse those who made the discovery of “starving the children.”  They “played chicken” with the budget and USAID’s reputation.  By winning too often, they pushed the envelope to greater fraud.

Our budget deficit has ballooned.  We need to downsize programs across the board.  USAID mismanagement/diversion eroded voter confidence.  Administrators arrogantly responded by doubling down with the same tactics that kept us from asking questions/checking their books.  This level of arrogance, fraud, and mismanagement necessitated these logical repercussions.  Even staunch USAID advocates are now questioning its continued existence.  Firings, reorganizations, audits, and temporary expenditure freezes are required to improve transparency and retain some of USAID’s reputation.

We need to stop being so afraid of being accused of “starving children” that we allow bureaucrats to spend fraudulently.  Years of diversion have undermined USAID’s mission to reduce child starvation.

Alan Burke