On Friday, Jan. 30, the Guilford County Board of Commissioners held its annual retreat and heard from an economic development expert – who had both advice and warnings for Guilford County as it moves forward and faces serious challenges in the coming years.
The presentation was delivered by Ted Abernathy, managing partner of Economic Leadership LLC, a nationally known consulting firm that works with states, regions and private companies on economic and workforce strategy.
Abernathy, who has decades of experience in economic development and corporate site selection, framed his remarks around how Guilford County is viewed from the outside – by companies, investors and site selectors who rely heavily on data to make their decisions.
His overarching message to Guilford County leaders was to engage in serious scenario planning, align economic development with long-term workforce and housing strategies, and prepare for faster change rather than stability. Communities that plan for where the economy is headed – rather than where it has been – will be best positioned to succeed, he said.
Abernathy stressed that while local officials naturally focus on what’s happening inside the county, most economic decisions are made by people who have never set foot in a boardroom in Greensboro.
Those decision-makers evaluate communities almost entirely through data dashboards that compare places against one another. In that environment, he said, perception and competitiveness are shaped less by intentions and more by measurable outcomes such as workforce availability, the speed of permits, infrastructure readiness, housing affordability and risk.
He began by describing the broader national economic picture as a period of overlapping shocks rather than a normal cycle.
Trade policy changes, shifting federal spending priorities, immigration constraints, technological disruption, election-year uncertainty and changing consumer behavior are all happening at once. While the fundamentals of the US economy remain solid overall,
Abernathy told the county leaders that the effects vary widely by place, meaning some regions thrive while others struggle even during the same economic moment.
North Carolina, he noted, continues to benefit from strong population growth and job creation, particularly compared to the Midwest and Northeast.
However, much of that growth has come from adding workers rather than by increasing productivity, which helps explain why this state’s per-capita GDP has lagged behind faster-growing peers. The type of jobs being added matters, he told the board, and that distinction becomes increasingly important when communities compete for higher-wage industries.
Turning to Guilford County specifically, Abernathy pointed out that the county’s resident workforce has been essentially flat for a decade. With unemployment already low, future growth will depend less on tapping unused labor and more on attracting new residents.
That, in turn, he added, places livability and housing squarely at the center of economic strategy.
Recent job growth patterns illustrate both opportunity and concern. Construction employment has surged, reflecting optimism and significant investment activity. Manufacturing employment, however, has declined both locally and statewide. This mirrors a national trend in which manufacturing output continues to rise due to automation – even as job counts fall because companies can’t find enough skilled workers.
Manufacturers consistently report that labor availability and skills shortages are the main barriers to expansion, not a lack of demand.
Abernathy emphasized that this reality puts a great deal of pressure on workforce development systems. As Guilford County’s economy has shifted over the past 20 years, the skills required of workers have shifted with it.
Health care and education employment has grown rapidly, while manufacturing and financial services have contracted. Office support roles, he said, have declined sharply, while construction, logistics and technical occupations have expanded.
These changes, Abernathy said, disproportionately affect mid-career workers whose jobs have evolved or disappeared – increasing the importance of retraining and community college capacity.
Consumer behavior also presents risks. While inflation has moderated, it has now settled into a stubborn range between roughly 2.5 and 3 percent. At the same time, households are spending more than they earn, pushing debt levels higher.
Rising insurance costs, particularly when it comes to health care and housing, were identified as warning signs that could strain household budgets and dampen local economic momentum.
Commercial real estate trends further complicate the picture: Office and retail construction has slowed dramatically nationwide, while industrial vacancy rates have begun to rise after several years of intense growth.
Multifamily housing, once a bright spot, is now seeing higher delinquency rates. Abernathy cautioned that speculative construction is likely to remain limited in the near term, underscoring the need for careful planning around sites and infrastructure.
A central theme of his presentation involved place-based competitiveness. Abernathy described economic development as a marathon in which every community is continuously measured against every other one. Success requires constant attention to business climate, infrastructure, workforce, quality of life, innovation capacity and risk.
He noted that companies increasingly focus on regulatory certainty and speed rather than just tax rates. They want shovel-ready sites, available buildings, sufficient power capacity, and clear timelines.
Workforce quality remains critical, but so does whether a community is a place where people want to live, stay and raise families. Crime rates, housing affordability, school quality, health care access, and amenities all factor into site selection decisions, he emphasized.
North Carolina continues to rank highly as a place to do business – but its cost advantages have narrowed. Housing prices across the state have risen more than 60 percent since 2020, he said, well above inflation. Guilford County remains more affordable than some major metros, but Abernathy warned that continued job growth without adequate housing supply will inevitably push prices higher.
Demographic trends add urgency, he noted. Fertility rates are falling nationwide, school-age populations are projected to decline and immigration is unlikely to offset workforce losses in the near future.
While North Carolina is projected to perform better than many states in retaining working-age adults, counties will increasingly compete with one another for a highly limited labor pool.
That competition, he said, will be won or lost on quality of life.
Abernathy also urged county leaders to pay close attention to energy.
The rapid expansion of data centers and artificial intelligence has dramatically increased projected electricity demand – far beyond what was anticipated just a few years ago.
Communities without clear energy strategies risk being bypassed by major projects, while regulatory and infrastructure decisions around power will shape economic outcomes for decades.
Technology, particularly AI, will reshape white-collar work more than manufacturing in the near term he told the county leaders. Many professional services jobs will not disappear but will change significantly, requiring different skills and fewer support roles.
He told the commissioners that planning for that transition now is essential.
Finally, Abernathy pointed to shifting global trade patterns and supply chains. As companies reshore, nearshore, and diversify suppliers, logistics and regional infrastructure will play a larger role in economic competitiveness.
Looking backward, he cautioned, is no longer a reliable guide to what lies ahead.

Great non-political take on the economy. Thanks for sharing.
Great coverage Scott, but as noted this year; our school system here in Guilford County continues to se a drop in attendance.
What we getting for $3 billion dollars, and why?
There’s a lot to unpack in this article – we need to build housing and commercial space to attract business and people, BUT commercial space and housing are declining in occupancy.
We need to plan for more services and population, BUT birth rates are declining.
We need to provide more workers, BUT AI will be taking over jobs.
We need to compete for business markets, BUT that competition is putting us financially out of the competition.
We need to recruit more people from other places to our workforce, BUT people here say they can’t find jobs that pay a living wage.
We need to “prepare for faster change rather than stability …” {according to Abernathy, the consultant from somewhere}, BUT admits “that while local officials naturally focus on what’s happening inside the county, most economic decisions are made by people who have never set foot in a boardroom in Greensboro.”
Great, just great. County Commissioners are advised by a consultant not from this area that he has no idea what’s going on inside local business boardrooms in GREENSBORO, while talking to the COUNTY BOARD. He says they should “prepare for faster change rather than stability” in the future, and paid him for that advice with our tax money. It seems that one huge problem the Board has is that it spends money wildly on “faster changes” instead of making stable financial plans, which is why our taxes are paying for BILLIONS in school funding when the birth rate is expected to go down, the workforce will be reduced due to AI, housing will be declining, and the building of businesses will decline if the water and energy to run them can’t be provided.
Read this article carefully. There’s so much twisted information in it. The bottom line is that they constantly want taxpayers to fund more businesses that blackmailed us for “incentives”, then ask for more money to fund housing for outside workers who move here while unemployed locals can’t find work. They claim they need more money to fund schools for kids who won’t be here in a few years, and schools they won’t maintain. Business buildings and homes are sitting empty in Greensboro and the County while new ones are being built with programs supported by tax money. Everything from the Southeast, East, and the middle of Greensboro is sucked out to the edges as it marches to the County borders, leaving huge, ugly, empty spots in the center. It’s not attractive and leads to degradation.
This isn’t the way to build a hopeful, thriving, stable city or county. Faster change with a helter-skelter bunch of thoughts thrown at a Vin Diagram is not the answer. Controlled growth with a clear, sensible plan is. Why a consultant from elsewhere when we have Business Schools galore at Universities and Colleges in this County? I think that says a lot.
Deborah,
You pretty well, IMO, summed it quite well. Skip the Omnipotent and his gaggle of “elected” sycophants have performed their usual “see, we care” dog and pony show in their usual attempt to convince us peons that they know what’s best for us.
Anyone care to bet how much of this “report” will wind up as toilet paper in their personal golden restrooms they have in the Puzzle Palace Supreme, aka the County offices?
Now to answer what I’m sure some are asking what We the Peasants can do. Call for and approve term limits on this gang of legal pirates, then start paying attention to those that want the job, then let them know their feet will be held to the fire, then ACTUALLY do just that.
Also keep in mind, just because someone calls themselves a Republican doesn’t mean they truly are one,
Yeah!
i would vote 4 U in a skinny minute
You have very negative take on a very informative assessment. Here is the more positive take I got from reading the article…..
“We need to plan for more services and population, BUT birth rates are declining.” – yes, because we are one of the States people are migrating into as our State has made NC very attractive with very low corporate tax rates.
“We need to provide more workers, BUT AI will be taking over jobs.” – Yes, as AI replaces lower skilled jobs, we will need more skilled workers.
“We need to compete for business markets, BUT that competition is putting us financially out of the competition.” – Not sure how you came to this conclusion….again the State makes us attactive, Guilford just needs to have the people to feed the higher paying industries versus the awful warehouse trend you are seeing in the area.
“We need to recruit more people from other places to our workforce, BUT people here say they can’t find jobs that pay a living wage.” – Not people…..people with the right skills…retraining using technical college is an imporant investment as they mention.
“We need to “prepare for faster change rather than stability …” {according to Abernathy, the consultant from somewhere}, BUT admits “that while local officials naturally focus on what’s happening inside the county, most economic decisions are made by people who have never set foot in a boardroom in Greensboro.” – You missed the point…..corporations that decide to move here do so because of data on PowerPoints….so if you want to have those businesses in GC, you need to understand the data they are using to evaluate and make sure you are moving the needle on those data points. Not complicated.
Maybe you need to read the article more carefully. Or if you are against growth, say so. Not all growth is good. But, all decline is bad. My 2 cents.
Best wishes.
nice rebut thnx. 5 altruists here > MY edu
Deborah summed it up pretty well.Exept she didn’t say that the county commissioners in Guilford county all need to be sent packing. The only thing they know how to do is waste our money. This consultant doesn’t know anything about our state so therefore he don’t know what the f*** he’s talking about. The main problem with North Carolina is its governor and it’s sanctuary status we don’t need more houses we have more than 2 million illegals in the state that need to be removed. This will free up not only housing but it’ll make our school rooms list crowded so the teachers can teach our American citizens instead of having to teach foreign kids that are holding our American children back. There needs to be more of a push toward technical colleges instead of universities that indoctrinate our children and don’t teach them s***. And I need to either lower or do away with property taxes for individual citizens but most of all the most important thing Guilford county needs to do and the whole state for that matter is cooperate with ice and Homeland security and get all these illegals out of our state that are ruining our nation that should be priority One
To add some facts to your BS….at the highest estimate, undocumented immigrants are estimated to be around 20k in GC. That is maybe 3% total. 2% to 2.5% of GC students are estimated to be undocumented. Yet, 18% to 20% of public schools students in GC speak English as a second language.
Don’t let facts get in the way of your bigotry.
thanks for the chuckle.
I fully understand how conservatives think facts are a joke. Remember Trump’s quote “Smart people don’t like me.”
. . . because he is a ‘genius’ !
Thanks for another chuckle.
In Summerfield we need to protect our wells — as no one is able to sell us water–so our Summerfield council is planning to co-mingle and destroy our homeowner wells — for higher density. Lynne Devaney put through high density in the UDO Unfied Development Ordinance with NO PUBLIC HEARING – -up to four apt buildings with 4 units in each bldge. Density higher than Guilford County. In Summerfield we are Government in the Closet and Spendaholics.
Why do you assume apartment buildings will damage your water? You will notice small ugly little ‘ponds’ near most apartments these days that are there specifically to address run off issues. What other concern do you have other than increased runoff concerns?
if u have good wells why does anyone need to buy water ? every well always needs ‘protection’ from contamination since the beginning of animals. many people buy water in small containers often because . . . ? how does ‘co-mingle’ destroy a well ? i am confuzzed ? i think ‘high density’ should be ‘downtown’ with me & my COG water (i filter)
no one is WILLING to sell you water ?
In Summerfield town council and manager 100% — gung ho — high density and co-mingle and destroy our exisitng homeowner wells. Water tower still a mystery-how tall–capacity. And they love their TEXAS engineering company. Development? No public hearings–Town sent a SURVEY and they will interpret results to what the six of them want.
And town council/ 100% voted YES for Imminent Domain and taking property as soon as possible–even leaving at least one senior homeless–VOTED 100% to take homeowner property.
Ted Abernathy could have been standing almost anywhere in the country and delivered the same presentation. He offered no new ideas and some of his comments were suspect such as not looking back but forward. I do agree that data centers are losers: Need for water and electricity puts the local population at risk by placing demands on resources, they employee a handful of people because the onsite monitoring is done remotely so no need for local employees, and they use a lot of land to build their machine-filled buildings to provide data all over the world. Data Centers are the backbone of artificial intelligence and the economy. They are not there to help the local economy or population but are used by huge companies (Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and META) to promote their businesses at the expense of the local environment. On a side note, Amazon uses the most H1B visas.
they are creating an electricity supply & their ‘coolant’ water just goes round in a virtuous circle that shouldn’t need ‘treatment’. i like AI because my dictionary/encyclopedia(s) were ALWAYS created years earlier & were NEVER current. 5 year old science info is not good enough. how is a student using diction/encyclo in the past to do an assignment any different from a student using AI ? they get the work done faster & do more & quality can be debated about any ‘source’ of truth/lie !
I don’t understand your comment.
i’m responding to scott’s ” the rapid expansion of data centers . . .” & the kerfuffle over students using AI in school & out.
Amazon also has the highest number of works receiving SNAP benefits (23% of all warehouse workers at Amazon). But hey, you get cheap delivery while subsidizing wages for Amazon so Bozo can get even richer.
Why do you think that is Chris. Amazon pays its warehouse workers a good wage. I’ll let you check it out for yourself then I’ll tell you what I think.
In NC, the average Amazon warehouse working wage is only 17 to 20 an hour. (17 is the starting wage). So in NC, if they work 40 hours a week, 35k year is not sufficient to raise a family without federal aid.
THAT is what I think.
i am a martian recruiter of women hired by earth men to . . . help fix my joke