A lot of volunteers at the Guilford County animal shelter say the county should have just left well enough alone last year and let the shelter continue to handle donations as it had done for years. Under that previous system, shelter workers would take in the donations and just use them in the best way they thought could help the shelter, the county and pet owners.
However, about a year ago, county administrators imposed new rules that resulted in huge problems with the shelter’s donation operations.
At the Board of Commissioners, Thursday, Feb. 6 meeting, the commissioners will unveil and adopt a new plan that will align the animal shelter with the Guilford County Division of Social Services and hopefully cut out much of the red tape that’s been causing all the problems.
Before a new plan was implemented last year, shelter workers could, for instance, if they knew someone was turning over their dog because they couldn’t afford dog food, give the owners some of the donated food to help them out and keep them from having to abandon their pets.
Also, under the old system that was in place for years, shelter workers could just throw away what was worthless – they didn’t need to elaborately track every item and hold on to useless donations until they were given the OK by county management to discard them.
Before the spring of 2024, the donation operations at the shelter worked very well and helped dogs and cats at the shelter get adopted: In addition to providing food, shelter workers could offer pet toys, leashes and other donated items to needy pet owners, which helped them decide to adopt.
Early in 2024, however, the Guilford County manager’s office began imposing a host of new rules regarding how in-kind donations were handled by Guilford County Animal Services at the shelter.
Once the county manager’s office changed the requirements, every donation to Guilford County Animal Services had to be fully inventoried on a daily basis. Shelter employees also had to estimate the value of every item and record the donation along with its assessed value.
After that, each inventory list had to be approved by the Guilford County manager’s office before any of the items on the list could be used or discarded. The policy took up a lot of space, and donations even overtook the break room, as is pictured above.
Also, under that policy that went into effect in 2024, no donated items could be shared with the pet-owning public. They were either used by Animal Services, thrown away or listed as unneeded surplus property by the county.
Due to the change, Guilford County Animal Services was forced to cancel large, regular donations from major companies such as Chewy and the Humane Society of the United States, which were sometimes worth over $60,000 per quarter.
Many other counties use a very flexible system like the one the Guilford County animal shelter used for years; however, Guilford County administrators stated that the system was not acceptable under the North Carolina laws that govern how items donated to local governments must be handled.
Last fall, Guilford County animal shelter officials and other county administrators began forming a new plan – the one that will be adopted this week.
Details of the new policy haven’t been released, but it will call for the shelter to work with social services to distribute the donated items to needy pet owners.
According to the information included with the item on the agenda,
“This action will memorialize the approval to operate a public assistance donation receipt and distribution program to provide donated goods to residents in need, which means it must comply with certain donation acceptance and property disposal statutes and policies.”
The information provided to the county commissioners goes on to state, “The Animal Services department may, upon approval by the Board of Commissioners and in compliance with applicable laws and County policies, partner with the Division of Social Services to engage in public assistance programs which accept and use donated pet-related goods to residents in need. With this approval and appropriate integration with the Division of Social Services, Animal Services may treat the distribution of the donations intended to support these programs to community members as uses of the donated items, instead of disposal as surplus property. Once accepted, these donations (and donations made without restrictions as to the end user) may be distributed to individuals in need. This program will serve a public purpose by providing pet-related goods to pet owners in need and avoid certain Animal Shelter expenses by reducing the number of animals surrendered to the Animal Shelter.”
It all still sounds pretty complicated, but hopefully it will improve the situation.
County animal lovers, and shelter workers and volunteers, are pleased the county has come up with a plan, but some said they are eager to see the details. If a donation recipient has to, for instance, fill out a lot of forms at social services and go through many other hoops, then that, they say, might defeat the purpose of getting the supplies to those in need.
“Not everyone who needs help with pet supplies is a client of DSS and they don’t want to become one,” one shelter volunteer told the Rhino Times.

Great info!
Continue to render Simple, Plain,welcoming News!
joyce@jhscompany.com
Great Slmplistic News
from our greatest simpleton . . . just kidding.
Just another way for Guilford County to control everything! King Skippy is more than likely figuring out a way to pocket funds from this like he does everything else in Guilford County. They need to let the shelter handle it the way they see best! And I fully agree with the statement that not everyone is a client at DSS and doesn’t want to be. They put you through the ringer and make all kinds of demands now. If you get Medicaid and own property, they can now claim that property when you die to pay back the Medicaid that comes from the taxpayers! The taxpayers sure ain’t getting that money back so I can’t help but wonder whose pockets that money is going into? Guilford County is the greediest county around. They are the most manipulative County around. It’s all about the money and how much they can put in their pockets. To hell with the residents. They don’t care about anyone. Except themselves
Thanks Scott. More bloated county govt BS. The monkees running the zoo once again muck up and make a mountain out of a mole hill. What they touch does not always turn to gold. The past and continued trend is to increase taxes and then waste said taxes on personal pet projects to buy votes and expand a debt filled agenda.
Scott in case you haven’t heard, you are the only news source left in Greensboro. The News-Record, which is now being printed in Va. hasn’t been delivered this week apparently the printing press in Va. is out of order. Thanks for keeping us informed.
& the online edition is down . . . & the content is down . . . & the profit is down . . . but i am going fishing
This article is a good one, if nothing else than to tell you the ridiculous details of how government works.
why do people who can’t feed an ‘x’ have an ‘x’ . . . then seek charity ?
Sometimes an owner becomes (seriously) sick or loses a job etc. Having a loving pet, often is the incentive someone needs to not only recover, but thrive.
I can see that someone could make money off of donations. I expect this is extremely rare. Often these people are found out and the donations dry up.
Let’s repeal whatever law or rule is making this a thing to distract us from more important things.
Time to move on to much more important things, like what the government is doing with our tax money in the USAID fund. Yeah, that is WAY MORE money than anything being donated to the shelter trying to keep animals and people alive in our local area. And WAY MORE important.
With all of the “pet projects” the city and county governments funds, this one seems to be an insurmountable challenge. There is not enough room in the shelter to house a dog named Bureaucracy.
Moronic. Social Services doesn’t have adequate resources to run a pet food donation center. Additionally, the wait is really long for services in those agencies as it is. The whole idea seems rooted in obsession to control. Would we ask animal shelter to distribute food for those who need it? This could easily be handled by a civic group and a donated shed to store product. It could be staffed by volunteers. Maybe a great project for a senior activities program? They need meaningful activities for clients. That is just the kind of things seniors could excel st handling while making important contributions to the community.
I have always said there are three kinds of people in the world. The ones with book sense, the ones with common sense, and those who are gifted to have both. The King Skippy clan seem to be the ones with book sense and not a lick of common sense. Most of our City Council and our Wonderful Mayor are in that same clan. Sometimes you’re better off to just leave well enough alone. But King Skippy and his back pocket followers got to get all that they can for themselves. I’m really starting to hate this place I’ve called home for 67 years.
I think you sell Skip-the-hyp short. He is smart enough to know common sense, but he marches to the Party Tune.
****
And that, dear reader, is exactly how government works.
I’m (Skip) from the (County) government and I’m here to help!
Translation: One of my contributors figured out a way to get something out of this so now I’m ready to make the appearance of doing something using YOUR dime.
Visited the animal shelter in the last few years? See who is running it? Could it be employee theft (shrinkage), or employee resale? I have no faith in government, none. And notice that I did not say which government, I mean them all.
Look at what they do, not what they say.
Most people get their news (if they have any interest at all) from the Idiot Box, or the press (such as “U.S.A. Today”, “NYT”, CBS, etc.) Either or any way, they don’t know Jack. If they bother to vote at all, their vote is mis or mal informed. (Thank you, Denzel).
Our Republic, use it or lose it.
Have you seen the fee schedule to adopt a pet. Seems to me that would be happy to have one less animal to maintain; or are they just milking the taxpayer for more money?