If at first you don’t succeed, try and try again.

That’s the advice offered by an unknown source in the 1850s, and, nearly two centuries later, that has been the philosophy of the Guilford County Board of Commissioners when it comes to attempting to get county residents to vote a sales tax increase on themselves in the form of a quarter-cent sales tax hike that would apply to most things sold in Guilford County.

The Guilford County commissioners have, time and time again, put the initiative on the ballot, only to see it, time and time again, struck down by voters.

The Rhino Times is 99 percent sure that voters will not approve the sales tax once again this year– largely because they’ve always voted it down in the past and also because people these days certainly feel like they’re already paying too much for everything they buy.

But there’s another reason the tax initiative fails here while it has passed in many other counties: A lot of people simply do not trust the Guilford County Board of Commissioners to do with the money what they promise to do with it.

 The last time the sales tax failed the county had passed a resolution to use the money for school construction debt repayment.

This time around they had another idea that they thought would work better: Pass a resolution saying that the money – an estimated $25 million or so, annually – would go toward increasing the salaries of school teachers and others in the school system who would be sympathetic beneficiaries of the money.

However, the problem is that many voters in Guilford County believe that, if they give the already very free-spending board yet more millions of dollars, the board, no matter what the resolution says, will spend it however they damn well please.

Or, to take it from another angle, even if the county technically spends that money on school system salaries, county funds are fungible, so the county commissioners – who likely would have given more for school salaries anyway that year– will just have extra money to, say, give to a non-profit run by a friend of one of theirs.

And, even if the current Board of Commissioners is absolutely committed to using that money for school salaries and not replacing the spending with other county dollars, there’s another problem: Current boards of commissioners cannot make commitments for future boards.

There’s an election coming up in less than two weeks that could alter the nature of the board – and, also, the Guilford County Board of Commissioners could look drastically different than it does now in five years or ten years.

That future board may not feel the same as the current board and, legally, those commissioners can use the money however they choose no matter what the current board has said of pledged in a resolution.

Legally, neither the school system nor the county commissioners are allowed to use taxpayer dollars to promote the passage of the sales tax (though they are allowed to provide objective information about it).

However, the Guilford County Board of Education is blatantly advertising for the tax hike. For instance, take a look at https://www.gcsnc.com/salestax which was created using tax dollars.

There is literally a video commercial favoring the sales tax increase on the site, and the site also makes the following claim …

“On Nov. 5, 2024, voters in Guilford County will consider a sales tax referendum. If the sales tax referendum passes, Guilford County Schools will use the additional funding to:

    • Recruit and retain effective teachers
    • Increase compensation to frontline workers.”

However, again, that’s what the commissioners have said they plan to do with the money, but the commissioners aren’t legally bound to use it in that way and, also again, money is fungible.

The problem is that there’s no specific language on the ballot that commits the new revenue stream money to a certain purpose.

At the Thursday, October 17 meeting of the Guilford County Board of Commissioners, At-Large Commissioner Kay Cashion spoke of the efforts of counties across the state to change state law so that, in the future, counties in North Carolina would be allowed to use very specific language on the ballot that would legally commit the money to particular purposes such as teacher pay.

Her belief, and that of some other commissioners is that, if the ballot language could legally obligate that money to a certain purpose, it would take the trust issue out of the equation, and voters would be more inclined to approve the ballot measure since commissioners – present or future – couldn’t just take the money and spend it in any way they want.

The North Carolina Association of County Commissioners is pushing for that change; however, it’s not clear whether state lawmakers will go along.

Regardless, that change may not help the current referendum pass, but, who knows what will happen the next five times the commissioners put the sales tax referendum on the ballot in Guilford County.