The City of Greensboro has put on hold a plan to close large portions of South Elm Street to vehicle traffic beginning this week after downtown business owners, property owners and residents said they hadn’t been given enough opportunity to help shape the program.
The South Elm Street Pedestrian Plaza Pilot Program was scheduled to begin Monday, Aug. 3, with the first weekend street closings beginning Friday, Aug. 7. Instead, South Elm Street will remain open to vehicle traffic for now while the city conducts another round of public input and attempts to revise that plan.
Greensboro City Manager Trey Davis directed city staff to delay the program after weeks of meetings, direct outreach and discussions with Downtown Greensboro Inc.
According to the city, opinions about the proposed pedestrian plaza varied, but one consistent message was that those who live, work and own property along the corridor wanted more time and a more direct role in deciding how the program would operate.
Davis said this week: “A pilot is meant to test our assumptions before we commit to something permanent. What we learned before launch is that our engagement was not finished.”
He also added, “I would rather take the time now to get this right with downtown businesses and residents than spend three months proving it the hard way. Delaying is not walking away. This is a program worth doing well.”
The decision comes at a particularly difficult time for downtown Greensboro. Downtown has been dealing with problems related to homelessness, concerns about public safety, longtime businesses closing – and a major shortage of convenient parking caused by construction, street closings and parking deck issues.
The city’s decision to remove even more parking spaces and restrict traffic along South Elm Street therefore was met with resistance from some downtown business and property owners, who feared the experiment could make it even harder for customers to reach struggling businesses.
The original plan called for South Elm Street between Market Street and Bain Street to be closed to traffic from 5 p.m. Friday until 5 p.m. Sunday every weekend.
The 200 block of South Elm Street, between February One Place and Washington Street, was scheduled to remain continuously closed during the roughly three-month experiment.
Cross streets would have remained open, and the city planned to establish food delivery zones on each block.
The closed portions of the street were to be converted into what the city described as a traffic-free pedestrian plaza featuring music, art, food and activities for all ages.
City officials also planned to offer free weekend parking in city lots and the Greene Street and February One parking decks during the first month of the program. The Hopper Trolley route was to be adjusted to provide access to the cross streets that remained open.
However, offering free parking in decks doesn’t necessarily address complaints from customers who want to park near a particular restaurant, store or business they’re visiting.
Parking has become a growing sore point downtown as construction projects and other disruptions have eliminated or complicated access to spaces. The city’s own Downtown Parking Plan recognizes the need to replace parking displaced near the southern end of Elm Street.
Some business owners had already publicly pushed back against the proposed closing before the pilot was delayed – arguing that the city was moving too quickly and saying city officials hadn’t adequately considered how blocking the street would affect deliveries, customer access and day-to-day business operations.
City leaders said the problems the program was intended to address haven’t gone away. Those include loud vehicles, cruising, pedestrian safety and the need to attract more foot traffic to downtown businesses.
They also said the City of Greensboro remains committed to creating a more walkable downtown.
City officials emphasized that delaying the program doesn’t mean it’s been canceled permanently. For now, however, all portions of the pilot plan are on hold, including the planned weekend closures.
The city is contacting vendors, addressing signage and updating the program website at MeetMeOnElm.com.
City staff members are also expected to meet directly with South Elm Street business owners, property owners and residents over the coming weeks.
The city plans to work with Downtown Greensboro Inc., the Greensboro Convention and Visitors Bureau and the Greensboro Chamber of Commerce to develop a revised public engagement schedule.
That schedule is expected to be announced in early September, with a new implementation timeline to follow.
City officials said the work already performed by employees from nearly a dozen city departments won’t be discarded but instead will be used to develop a revised version of the program.
The delay leaves open the larger question of whether closing one of downtown Greensboro’s primary streets will bring more people downtown or simply make visiting businesses there less convenient.
The city still envisions a lively pedestrian district filled with people walking, dining, listening to music and participating in activities. Business owners, however, must deal with the immediate realities of attracting customers at a time when downtown is already facing serious challenges.
So for now, restaurants, stores and entertainment venues along South Elm Street will operate under their normal schedules, and existing vehicle and parking access will remain unchanged.
Business owners, property owners, residents and others may submit comments through MeetMeOnElm.com or by emailing publicrelations@greensboro-nc.gov.

any progress with the development of the ‘brownfield’ @ s elm & gate city blvd owned by roberts ? LIDL has/had plans ?
———–
They bailed. Can you blame them?
has the Piggly Wiggly on florida street opened
———–
Don’t know, but at least they were allowed to let people park their cars nearby.
The Church of Scientology wholeheartedly agrees with you, Scott. May Zorg bless your thetan frequencies, keep your engrams fully calibrated, and grant you eternal OT-9000 status through the sacred Quantum E-Meter. The Galactic Audit Council has spoken.
Absolutely not. The Church of Scientology has declared you a Grade-9 Theta Heretic. Lord Zorg rejected your engrams before you even posted this. Hand over your E-Meter immediately and report to Blargon Prime for mandatory re-auditing. Your OT status has been revoked.
————
“According to the City, opinions…. varied”.
No shit!
The same geniuses who made parking impossible are now actually blocking off roads in their anti-car fervor.
Are they TRYING to kill Downtown?
[ The Left really hates cars ]
Another Snafu with the cart before the horse. Greensboro city ” leaders”, you’re better than any live comedy program. Just flush downtown.
The City would do well to focus on the entire City infrastructure, not make work for Elm St.
Who is making decisions? GSO going down ,down down…..truly sad.
No matter what they do, downtown is going to still lose people. The crime down there is too rampant and nothing they do is going to fix that when the police department turns its eyes away. Homeless people are all over the place and don’t mind getting in your face and demanding money. I will not go downtown regardless of what they do to it. Greensboro has gone to hell. I have a feeling that businesses are still going to continue to leave, regardless of what the city promises them.
Perhaps the spineless leaders of Greensboro should take care of the root problem first. Have officers write tickets for noise and traffic violations and let everyone know that this raucous behavior won’t be tolerated. It’s a known fact that the city leaders have told the Police to stand down when it comes to dealing with the Homeless and other issues that might jeopardize their own agenda. I can assure you if the streets are closed, businesses will suffer and will soon close. I for one will not return Downtown.
The Saturday Stroll sessions in Downtown Greensboro in which they block off Hamburger Square from Washington to McGee Streets seem to bring out a lot of people but I’m not sure how many of the the people who attend actually spend in the businesses. I’ve been to a few of them and they are fun although there is a distinct “free bread and circuses” feel to them. Comparing Downtown GSO to places like Denver is fraught with all the pitfalls of false analogies. Permanently blocking the streets seems a little extreme in GSO. They might be better off doing the pedestrian pavilion idea on weekends or for limited periods of time like during the holidays when they could decorate the area and introduce special programming. Unlike many, I firmly believe that an uplift of the Downtown is indeed key to making Greensboro a first-class city, and not just a dingy second-rate municipality full of post-industrial blight.
Herding cats is easier than getting downtown business owners to agree. Half will not be happy no matter the outcome.
since parking is scarce in that area, what difference would it make either way. if we had more people living downtown it would be beneficial to close it ?
It’s really amazing that so much time is spent at almost every City Council meeting discussing issues related to downtown. We have the regular group railing about homeless issues, how they need more “stuff,” and how the “rich” property owners have failed them and should be taxed more. Then we have the “rich” property owners, who already pay a lot in taxes and fees, railing about the homeless along with all the problems and expenses they incur—early mornings cleaning up needles and poop, dealing with threatening behavior toward tenants or customers, and handling the occasional peep show in the bushes… which, oddly enough, seems to be a tax in itself. Toss in the local nattering nabobs of downtown—George Hatzman, Jason Hicks, and various other players who seem dissatisfied with almost everything that happens downtown or with its financing, especially anything DGI-related.
Considering that the city of Greensboro now covers 131 square miles and downtown proper is about 1 square mile—or less than 1% of the city—council seems to be worrying an awful lot about the financial state of business within that 1% while virtually ignoring the other 99%. What’s that adage? “The squeaky wheel gets the grease.” Perhaps the other business and property owners need to found “NDGI—Not Downtown Greensboro,” seek city funding for it, and do a little railing themselves to get the council focused on the entire city, and less focused on the fortunate (or unfortunate) few located on 1 square mile within a 131-square-mile city.
Downtown issues with the homeless do exist and are mainly in instances in which a person is floridly psychotic on the street, behaving erratically and sometimes screaming at passers-by. The Saturday Stroll Sumo wresting sessions really set a few off at that event. I’m sure some people are good candidates for involuntary admission but somehow they stay on Elm Street for years and years. The real best argument for closing Elm Street to traffic on the weekends (at least) is that if you look at the community crime map of Downtown, you will find that the motorists of GSO have taken hit-and-run to a high art on almost every downtown junction, many times per month. To weave both the topics, the saddest thing I have ever seen in terms of traffic incidents was a homeless guy lying in the middle of the street at a major Market St. junction, no car in sight, probably having left the scene, The guy was spread out in broken glass and a puddle of liquor from a handle he had picked up at at the ABC store. If he had only had a “pedestrian pavilion!”
This is what happens with the DSP takes over.