Even though Hurricane Helene ravaged North Carolina in September of last year, now, in mid-February of 2025, the tragedy is still front and center on the minds of North Carolina legislators who are currently banging out relief and recovery plans for the victims whose lives were decimated by the massive rainfall, flash flooding and high winds.

NC Governor Josh Stein and state lawmakers haven’t yet reached an agreement on the amount of money to be spent in a plan to meet immediate needs; however, the governor has proposed a plan that would cost slightly more than $1 billion, while state lawmakers are talking about an amount of roughly half that.

This is just for the relief that will meet immediate needs; everyone realizes billions more will have to go into the relief efforts for years to come.

Cities on the Florida coast are designed and constructed with the idea that a hurricane may hit; however, North Carolina’s mountain communities are not, and, when the hurricane hit a half year ago, the devastation was almost unimaginable.

Private and public relief began pouring into the towns and communities in Western North Carolina soon after the weather relented, but now longer-term relief is being sought.

 In a letter to lawmakers, the governor wrote: “Hurricane Helene wrought great devastation across western North Carolina. Over 100 lives were lost, and many more were disrupted. We are facing nearly $60 billion in damages. Despite a tremendous response from federal, state, local, and private and nonprofit partners in the immediate aftermath … it is clear that much more is needed to restore and rebuild western North Carolina.”

Stein added, “True recovery from a disaster of this magnitude will require a powerful, coordinated, and timely response. We cannot ask the residents who are suffering today to wait until next fiscal year for relief. Their needs are dire and immediate; the state’s response should be immediate. The Governor and the General Assembly must work together with a sense of urgency to build western North Carolina back safer and stronger.”

The governor went on to say that the ultimate cost to the state in disaster recovery appropriations will amount to billions of dollars for years to come and that some of that money has to be appropriated and spent now.

The plan Stein has outlined commits $1.07 billion to address immediate needs in the western part of the state through July 1, 2025.

There’s a long list of programs included in the proposed package.  Here are just a few of those initiatives:

  • $150 million across two grant programs for businesses that suffered physical damage or significant economic loss.
  • $30 million for grants to small towns and counties to rebuild downtowns and other business districts.
  • $15 million to the Economic Development Partnership of North Carolina’s VisitNC division to support North Carolina’s tourism industry and to attract travelers and new businesses to the area.
  • $100 million for revenue replacement grants to support local governments whose resources were exhausted by immediate disaster response – as they work to keep water and sewer services going, pay law enforcement, and support school operations.

In addition to rebuilding aid, some elements of the proposed package are meant to keep those whose homes were destroyed safe and warm until new housing is available.  That includes:

  • $150 million for a Helene Home Construction and Repair Program to immediately start rebuilding the estimated 5,100 homes that will need to be rebuilt post-Helene.
  • $25 million to support people struggling to afford rent, mortgage, or utility costs because their home or livelihood was affected.
  • $10 million for a program that supports people who are without homes and provides them with case management support.
  • $50 million in incentives for affordable housing construction.
  • $25 million to fill in gaps for home repairs that aren’t covered by FEMA.

The package also calls for replacing infrastructure, and that means millions more to repair roads and bridges – including private roads and bridges –  and also cleaning up local parks and greenways in affected areas, which is estimated to cost 25 million.  Then there’s expediting debris removal ($12 million), providing backup power for emergency operations and other critical infrastructure ($10 million), and repairing septic systems ($4 million).

The General Assembly’s scaled-back still-in-flux $500 million disaster relief spending plan addresses many of the same critical needs the governor’s plan does.

Other agencies are making moves to help the victims as well: FEMA for instance has extended its deadlines for filing for relief.

 And there is a Shelter Trailer Program available for up to six months for eligible survivors whose homes cannot yet be occupied.

Even at the national level, the sixth-month-old tragedy in North Carolina is at the center of attention because President Donald Trump has announced his wish to get rid of FEMA and turn disaster relief over to the states.  When the storm hit, before the election, Trump used what he claimed was a slow response by FEMA to blast Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, hoping it would help move the needle in North Carolina, which was considered to be an important swing state in the last election.

This week, Trump continued to blast FEMA in his social media posts, and he stated that FEMA will be “a whole big discussion very shortly.”

On Tuesday, Feb.11, a Truth Social post from the president read, “FEMA spent tens of millions of dollars in Democrat areas, disobeying orders, but left the people of North Carolina high and dry. It is now under review and investigation. THE BIDEN RUN FEMA HAS BEEN A DISASTER. FEMA SHOULD BE TERMINATED! IT HAS BEEN SLOW AND TOTALLY INEFFECTIVE. INDIVIDUAL STATES SHOULD HANDLE STORMS, ETC., AS THEY COME. BIG SAVINGS, FAR MORE EFFICIENT!!!”

Also, brand new US Homeland Security Director Kristi Noem, who now runs the agency that oversees FEMA, said recently that the federal government should “get rid of FEMA the way it exists today.”

Despite Trump’s desire to eliminate the agency, doing so would require legislative action, and support for the move might prove hard to come by given the millions and millions of victims the agency has helped and the lives that have been saved by the federal agency across the country throughout the terms of both Democratic and Republican presidents.

Also, while some richer states might be able to self-fund disaster relief programs, the action would likely harm the poorest states the most.  Those are states where Trump is highly popular.  In the November 2024 US presidential election, nine of the ten poorest states, starting with Mississippi, the very poorest, were carried by Trump by wide margins:

Mississippi: 60.89% voted for Trump.

Louisiana: 64.57%

West Virginia: 68.62%

Arkansas: 65.32%

Alabama: 64.57%

Kentucky: 62.09%

Oklahoma: 65.37%

South Carolina: 57.88%

Tennessee: 60.66%

(New Mexico voted for Kamala Harris, with Trump receiving 43.99% of the vote there.)