So the man who gaslighted the American people six years ago as he tried to force us all to submit to a toxic injection is now taking the Fifth Amendment – 111 tlimes! – in an attempt not to incriminate himself by having to tell the truth.
His name is Anthony Fauci, and he once publicly said that an attck on him was an attack on science, so perhaps I should call him Mister Science. He was never attacked. He means that he was criticised. That is how grotesquely engorged – and thin skinned – his ego is.
Apparently, 83 per cent of US adults accepted his instructions and submitted to the huge societal pressure to get jabbed. Biden was an accomplice, as were most of the media.
I’m with the one in six who didn’t. And so is my wife. We are “Right Wing Nut Jobs”, “Tinfoil Hat Wearers”, and “Conspiracy Theorists”. And today we are perfectly healthy, even though we both contracted COVID. I’ve had flu that was worse. According to the American Red Cross lab tech I spoke to, my blood had high levels of COVID antibodies, meaning that I’d developed natural immunity (I give blood).
The whole thing was a big nothingburger.
The death rate from COVID -SARS 19 was less than 1 per cent, mostly the elderly and infirm.
The virus was man made, and escaped from China’s biological warfare research laboratory in Wuhan. The “vaccine” – which was not a vaccine – was an unprecedented toxic cocktail of laboratory modified human RNA, and the whole episode became an exercise in how much control the state can exercise over the individual, how much liberty we might surrender. Sadly, most people submitted. And the media incessantly peddled the absurd “wet market” origin lie that we now know was promulgated by scietists who knew it was bullshit, and said as much to each other.
And still there are millions of intellectual sheep who place their faith in “science” and “studies” and “experts”, as these same experts and scientists were engaged in wholesale deception of the American people.
Thank God some of us still have the capacity to think for ourselves.
And – incredibly! – the naysayers and conspiracy theorists like me are still alive, hale and hearty. No myocarditis, no strokes, no heart attacks from the Clot Shot, no “turbo cancers”. And our blood is unadulterated and healthy.
Imagine that.
Dare to think for yourself. The next round will come.
And Fauci belongs in prison.
– Austin Morris
Austin’s letter illustrates a curious definition of “thinking for yourself”: accept every conclusion that supports your suspicions, dismiss every contrary study as propaganda, and treat surviving COVID without vaccination as proof that the pandemic was a hoax. The mind of an anti-science conservative at work.
Austin also treats the fact that he and his wife survived COVID as though it disproves the seriousness of the disease. It does not. Millions of people survived COVID; that was never in question. Many people also survived without hospitalization, particularly if they were younger, healthier, or infected after less severe variants emerged. Individual experience cannot establish the population-wide impact of a disease. COVID caused enormous excess mortality worldwide, and excess-death estimates suggest that the pandemic’s total death toll was substantially greater than the number officially recorded as COVID deaths.
The claim that COVID was “a big nothingburger” is especially difficult to reconcile with the evidence. A disease does not have to kill more than 1 percent of everyone infected to be catastrophic. A fatality rate below 1 percent applied to hundreds of millions of infections still produces millions of deaths. The fact that risk was concentrated among older people and those with underlying conditions does not make those deaths unimportant. Apparently, “mostly the elderly and infirm” is now supposed to mean “mostly people whose lives do not count.”
Austin is correct that vaccine-associated myocarditis was a real, though uncommon. That risk should never be denied or minimized. But acknowledging a genuine, rare risk is not evidence that the vaccines caused widespread strokes, “turbo cancers,” mass clotting, or a hidden epidemic of deaths. Large safety reviews have not found evidence that mRNA vaccination caused increased overall mortality or sudden cardiac death in healthy young people. Just more made-up talking points by those that don’t believe in science and the value of data and studies.
Calling mRNA vaccines “toxic injections” and claiming that vaccinated blood is “adulterated” are assertions, not evidence. mRNA vaccines do not alter a person’s DNA, and the mRNA is broken down after it delivers instructions to cells. If Austin has evidence that vaccinated people’s blood is permanently contaminated, he should provide it. (he won’t because it doesn’t exist) Repeating “Clot Shot” does not transform a slogan into a scientific finding. It just shows a willful ignorance of the truth.
The origin of COVID remains unresolved. A laboratory accident is a legitimate hypothesis. But “the virus was manufactured as a biological weapon and escaped from Wuhan” is not an established fact. U.S. intelligence assessments have expressed differing judgments, generally with low confidence, and the World Health Organization has said that both zoonotic spillover and a laboratory-related incident remain possible because crucial evidence is still unavailable.
There are valid criticisms to make of Fauci, government officials, the media, vaccine mandates, school closures, and pandemic policy. Public officials sometimes communicated too confidently, changed guidance without adequately explaining why, and treated reasonable questions as political disloyalty. Those failures damaged trust and warrant looking back for lessons learned.
But criticism becomes conspiracy theory when every error is treated as deliberate deception, every expert is assumed corrupt, every study is dismissed as propaganda, and personal survival is presented as proof that millions of deaths were imaginary.
Thinking independently does not mean rejecting expertise. It means applying the same skepticism to claims that confirm our beliefs as we apply to claims that challenge them. Austin asks us to “dare to think for ourselves.” Fair enough. That should include daring to ask whether his conclusions are supported by evidence (they aren’t) or merely by the satisfaction of believing that nearly everyone else was fooled.
Congratulations, Austin: you and your wife survived COVID without being vaccinated. By that logic, every person who survived a car accident without wearing a seat belt has disproved the value of seat belts. Personal anecdotes are apparently the new gold standard of science for conservatives…..provided, of course, they confirm what you already believed.
Think for yourself is great advice….I do it every time a read a letter or comment from Austin. I typically find that he lacks evidence, data, validated sources and instead uses willful ignorance, hate and personal bias to form his personal opinions to intentionally misrepresent the truth with lies and misinformation.
Cheers