A Letter From Rhino Times Reader Austin Morris
As another “Liberal” tries to use violence to overturn the democratic 2024 election – by murder, no less – so we see the true nature of the Left. They only believe in democracy when their preferred outcome prevails. Otherwise, like small children, they have temper tantrums and try to subvert the will of the people. And they’re not above using murderous violence.
Like Thomas Crooks before him, the attempted assassin at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner donated to the Leftist organization ActBlue, tagging his donation for Kamala Harris.
In an irony that will undoubtedly escape him, he will call himself a Democrat.
Even more incomprehensibly, Cole Allen will be a hero to some on the Left. For in the phrase coined by their fellow travelers in the National Socialist German Workers’ Party*, “The end justifies the means”.
Their unhinged hatred for Trump endorses any evil.
And after all, Allen was only recently awarded the “Teacher of the Month” award in December!
Maybe he’ll be featured on WGHP’s “What’s Right with Our Schools”.
– Austin Morris
* Often abbreviated in German and English to Nazi
.
Austin,
Very nice missive.
I’m anticipating someone will be start playing ‘I’m not a Nazi, you are’ game anytime soon.
Stay self-protected my friend.
———-
Thanks Patrick ! Protected I am (1911’s mostly).
Austin,
I knew there was something I liked about you
I recommend 230 grain Hydro-Shok
———-
Wow – we agree on that too, but I couldn’t find them for years, so I stopped looking. If anyone knows where to get Federal’s 230g Hydra-Shok Hollow Points, please speak up. If the stuff ever hits the fan, they will do the job.
Cheers Patrick!
Austin,Midway USA or SGAmmo sells them. You can find them on the internet
———–
Thanks, Reb !
I thot it was 45s…..
That is what I believe our President would like us to do…and Morris is very much doing in his letter. But I suggest it is a much broader problem yet with a very focused source given that accountability for the mood of the nation rests in one place and one place only.
im anticipating the inevitable comment from the One Who Shall Not Be Named referencing j6 as a counterpoint and acting like hes a genius as usual (spolier alert he isnt)
More Baloney!! The left believes in the correctness of American Elections. This would-be assassin is bonkers. Funny the violence over elections have come from which side in the Wilmington coup d’etat , the January 6, 2021
insurrrection and the American Civil War?
Mr Morris is yet again claiming political violence is unique to the left with a hyper focus on the recent event while ignoring the all the violence against the political leaders on the left by radical people from the right over the last few years. Especially the actual murder of a Democrat State Representative. Not to mention attempted Kidnapping, attempted murder, and innumerable amount of violent threats against anyone in the political arena from voting officials, school board members and over 14,000 threats against members of congress in 2025 alone (the highest number in history).
Violence is not a tool of just the left or just the right. It is a broad social problem across the entire political spectrum, and I suggest it is time for conservatives to understand the impact of an administration that drives negativity and hate at the core of its messaging on a daily basis is one of the root causes of these growing issues in our society. Morris and my own exchanges here in the Rhino Times are a great example of the downhill nature of political hate and ugly language.
When you have a president whose Christmas message uses phrases such as ‘Radical left scum’ and ‘rot in hell’, or a Thanksgiving message where he attacks refugees and legal immigrants by falsely claiming “most of them are on welfare, from failed nations, or from prisons, mental institutions, gangs or drug cartels” and even called a Governor he didn’t like ‘retarded’ on Thanksgiving. Those are just the Holiday messages.
Hate and division is a key focus for the majority of his communications. For example, when he recently explicitly stated his contempt for Democrats, saying “I hate them, too, you know that? I hate them. He continually refers to people who disagree with him as ‘vermin’, ‘thugs’, ‘traitors’, ‘scum’, ‘vile animals’, ‘enemy within’. This type of hateful language from a national leader can only lead to broad hate and division among his followers and his detractors.
The greatest fear of the left is that this driving of hate and division is intentional as a means to justify the erosion of individual rights of the people of the United States. I hope I am wrong, but I fear I am not.
———–
I did NOT claim that political violence is unique to the Left.
The Professor’s first lie is in his first line.
I’m not bothering with the rest of his lies. As everyone agrees, he has no credibility.
Zero.
I implied by your words ‘so we see the true nature of the Left.’……as well as what you left out of your letter, ie that violence is just as common from the right.
By your denial of my read on your letter, do we agree this is not a left / right issue but an American issue and no way unique to only the left?
———–
Your English is gibberish and incomprehensible. And I’m actually trying to understand it. A new reader has no chance of comprehending your Pidgin English.
I began by trying to substitute “inferred” for “implied”, so that it made more sense, but the balance of your crap is known only to you, “Professor”.
JV is right to ask if you’ve had a cerebral infarction. Are you alright? You seem increasingly disturbed and unbalanced.
Seek help. For your own sake.
Ad Hominem
professor/Christian C Rice/Chris/Polly Pocket/Sybil/Whatever,
“Ad Hominem”
I can say the same about you. Would you like me to post some examples?
I will give you a C for the clever attempt though.
Feel free to point anytime I do such a thing. Much appreciated.
.
“Moron”, “Hater’, “Bigot”, “Racist”, “Redneck”, “Tinfoil Hat wearer”, etc, etc…
The Professor has a very bad, and very selective memory. Truth is, he’s the guy who always starts the ad hominem personal insults.
Al Hare, an Ad Hominem is a type of deflection used in debates….just because someone uses a label or a funny name while actually address the point made isn’t an Ad hominem. Any examples you provide need context.
hope that helps.
—————
Careful Professor, your double standards are showing.
– “When I call you names, it’s not an ad hominem insult, but when you call me names, it is!”
And my original remark merely criticized your unintelligible language. No personal epithet or name calling was involved, although it can be inferred from your gibberish that you are unintelligent.
professor/Christian C Rice/Chris/Polly Pocket/Sybil/Whatever,
“The greatest fear of the left is that this driving of hate and division is intentional as a means to justify the erosion of individual rights of the people of the United States.”
‘The greatest fear of the LEFT…’? Who is responsible for the MAJORITY of violent mobs in the streets?
I am no fan of groups like the Proud Boys and other ‘groups’ like them. And while I’m sure they or some members of them have participated in violence, but I have NOT seen anything on the scale where there are HUNDREDS of their drones (Antifa, the radical wing of BLM and their offshoots are just two examples) disrupting/threatening peaceful gatherings, burning, looting, attacking en mass, (all documented), yet you want to try to make them appear to be innocent Little Red Riding Hoods. IMO that is the height of hypocrisy.
And before you go off on your usual demeaning, name calling, finger pointing rants like accusing people of being tin foil hat wearing kooks, talking down to them like they’re children, all the while using an ‘I’m better then you’ tone let me point out one of my personal core philosophical beliefs… I know I’m not perfect. The last perfect person was hung from a Cross.
But you go on following your own advice…you be you
When a group such as Proud Boys show up to a peaceful protest and violence occurs, is that the fault of the protestors or the Proud Boys and other groups of their kind? I suggest that is the fault and intent of groups such as the Proud Boys. Sure, the Left has similar groups of agitators. Some more and some less organized than Proud Boys but agitators they are all.
Personally, I believe finger pointing about who is worst is silly. I stand by the idea that rhetoric from the top leadership of our country sets the tone for all that engage in political debate, protest and conflict under him while he is in office….and Trump has served up the worst of this rhetoric of hate and division of any President in the history of the United States. I think THAT is where we need to focus on difference between the parties.
I also ask you not use my actual full name as the doxing of me is a type of political harassment that I would hope you would not want to be a part of. Go ahead make false claims about me posting using other names than Chris and Professor, but please do not use my full formal name. The recent doxing of me outside of Rhino Times is just another form of political violence even though it hasn’t yet become a physical threat. i stopped using my name for a reason as it appears some can take it as well as they dish it out. I hope Scott can help in this if possible.
Have you had a cerebral infarction?
———–
I hope the Professor is never ever subject to harassment because of his sincerely expressed beliefs, no matter how abhorrent I find them (and him).
This forum is a treasure in our locality because it permits free speech, and anonymous or veiled free speech is an essential pillar of freedom. I respect his wish to shield his identity. It is a decision I made myself before I ever made my first comment… but I believe he should choose his pseudonym and stick with it.
Austin, I found an old invoice. They are open 24/7. Good prices and fast shipping SGAmmo
Stillwater, Oklahoma
1-405-373-3500
professor/Cxxxxxxxx X Rxxx/Chris/Polly Pocket/Sybil/Whatever,
“I also ask you not use my actual full name as the doxing of me is a type of political harassment that I would hope you would not want to be a part of.”
Our hand-to-hand instructor’s first lesson was “if you try to fight fair, you will get what you deserve. You fight for two reasons…to defend yourself and to defeat your enemy.” And as far as your ”…hope…” I wouldn’t bet the farm on it.
For the record, I went back in the Rhino archives and found numerous examples where someone else used your full name introducing your Letter to the Editor, but as you wish I will no longer use your full name, but do reserve the right to do so if sufficiently provoked. What that standard is I will let you figure out.
In fact, as a sign of the adult I am I will even speak to Alan when I see him again and ask him to also desist, but I make no promises. Knowing him as well as I do, it will be like urinating into a head wind. Unlike some, I do not try to intrude on people’s God given Constitutional rights.
On a different note…”Personally, I believe finger pointing about who is worst is silly.”
Seriously?
Thank you for not using my full name any longer. It is appreciated.
Alan is the one person I believe I am inappropriately rude with and am trying to stop with the personal insults towards. I have always just seen him as the perfect example of MAGA simple mindedness that I believe is the foundation of what has destroyed the value of truth and facts in political discourse.
Thanks again. While we are a dysfunctional community, it is important to exchange ideas with people you don’t agree with, understand, or even like. But threats on my family and livelihood are too much so I prefer to use an anonymous username going forward.
Professor I do believe that you yourself have used your full name before in the Rhino.Otherwise how would anyone on here know what it is. As Don would say
“Dummy”
I do regret using my real name given some recent threats against my livelihood and family from a rhino times reader. But this is the world we now live in….it won’t make me go away as I am a believe in free speech and find the conservative view on issues as a challenge and enjoy engaging on using facts, data, and science to counter many of the more negative points of view of conservatives.
But yeah, I was a dummy to trust this community with my real name.
“The recent doxing of me outside of Rhino Times…”
“…recent threats against my livelihood and family from a rhino times reader.”
Which is it, outside the RT or an RT reader? Or is it something else, or do you need more time to get your story straight?
Here I will type slower this time.
I was DOX’d outside of the Rhino Times (ie, someone contacted me via a means other than RT comment section) by a Rhino Times reader (ie I know this because they referenced a comment of mine from the Rhino Times)
Hope that helps.
Thanks professor for the “Mr.” In front of Austin’s name, I’m glad you recognize he deserves that measure of respect. The same as
President Donald J. Trump
Trump president for life
If anyone thinks that the Democratic Party cares about them, they live in a bubble.
Democratic Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) was asked by MSNBC in 2024 why Democrats aren’t pushing for a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants, and Murphy replied. “So you are right that has been the Democratic strategy for 30 years, maybe, and it has failed to deliver for the people we care about the most, the undocumented Americans that are in this country.”
Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) wants American citizens to pay reparations to illegal aliens due to stress caused by ICE.
Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) opposes voter ID laws, calling them ‘voter suppression’ that could reduce voting rolls by 5–10%. This reveals Democrats’ preference for non-citizen votes over ensuring election integrity, raising concerns about their commitment to fair elections and national security
These ultra-progressive people believe in a mandated equality of results, achieved by radically high taxes on successful people and by transferring that money to unsuccessful people—an impossible dream.
Democrats are a party that cares about ALL people. So, if a family has lived in the US, raised a family and had kids that are US citizens for example, the party strongly supports the idea of a path for US citizenship versus straight deportation. Offering a path for these types of scenarios recognizes the contributions they have made by their work, paying taxes, and community involvement as well as having deep empathy for kids brought up by undocumented parents and the unwarranted emotional challenges they would face being forced from the country where they were born and raised.
Democrats have always believed that this offering be a one-time single event and that any bill offering this solution also involve improvements to existing immigration laws to better secure the border and manage large influxes of asylum seekers.
Sure, they ‘cheated’ to get here, but we allowed them to stay with lack enforcement of employers utilizing undocumented workers and allowing existing immigration law outdated with large holes in our border and immigration management.
Cruelty is ignoring the good a family has done for the community while solely focusing a desperate behavior we enabled years prior. I fully understand conservatives lack the compassion for these families because they ‘cheated / broke the law’, but I for one, believe in second chances and those families that have benefited their communities for many years deserve a path to citizenship.
Professor I’m going to defer to your first sentence “Democrats care about all people “. I say BS to that. A perfect example is skip and his merry band of minions. Skip doesn’t give a rats butt about White people. Never has and never will.
Just because he is very passionate about his pursuit of racial equity doesn’t mean he ‘hates’ white people or doesn’t care about them. The zero-sum argument you are making about people who pursue racial equity is a trope promoted by White Nationalist to support the lie about reverse racism.
Sure, there are such things as racist people of color but just because they support equity between races doesn’t make them racist. Other than his promoting of racial equity and overuse of the ‘race card’, what actions has Skip taken that defines him as a racist against White people?
To address the common misconception of democrats wanting to transfer wealth. I have many points that disagree with that characterization of democrats.
The idea is democrats only want the wealthy pay a fair share and the understanding that the current system allows the wealthy (especially the ultra-wealthy) to avoid paying a fair representation of their ‘income’ in taxes. The challenge with the wealthy is that they don’t just earn a paycheck with which to be taxed. For example, if you live off your savings outside of qualified plans, you only gain tax (15%) versus income tax 15%-25% . They are also able to afford to use tax deferral programs the average American can’t afford. Plus, they have access to many types of tax shelters that the average taxpayer does not.
With the ultra-wealthy it gets really creative how they can ‘borrow against assets’ versus selling those assets and having to pay gains taxes yet benefit from the massive (and untaxed) growth of those assets. This is how Musk can spend 100s of billions to buy Twitter but NOT have ever paid any tax on the growth of those assets.
You and I most likely are taxed on every bit of income we earn. The wealthier you are, the more ‘income’ you can hide, defer, or ignore since it is the wealthy people who have the ears and pockets of those writing the tax laws in congress.
I am not an expert on tax shelter strategies so don’t know how much income is hidden by the wealthy annually….but I do believe it is a great deal.
Happy to debate and discuss.
You should ask Pelosi or AOC
Ah, professor, I bet you write your opinions from a smartphone, tablet, or PC. Isn’t that wonderful?
Yet you want to tax those hard-working wealthy folks who made it possible for you to do this, like Steve Jobs, Michael Dell, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Al Gore, who invented the internet….plus many more
Yes, I want them to pay a fair share of taxes given they own a significant proportion of wealth thanks to both the government and the working class. Why should they be able to hide ‘income’ while we are taxed on every penny?
You’ve still never actually said specifically what that “fair share” is. No matter what the number you arbitrarily come up with, it is government spending on both sides that is the problem, not tax rates.
They should pay the same rate for their ‘income’ as you and I do (~35% – 37% for highest level of income or so)…..the key is they claim they do pay the same rate (or higher) but that doesn’t account for the hidden income of the high wealth individuals such as the examples I provided.
Recent Washington Post article discussed research that the top 1% of income earnings hide more than 20% of their income. In addition, the hidden income they hold $8.5 trillion in unrealized capital gains as well as $4 trillion overseas.
Note this doesn’t close the annual US budget gap even if fully taxed using current rates. But that is a different conversation of increased taxes and reduced spending.
They aren’t hiding it. They are using the laws as intended. You and I can use those same laws. But you haven’t earned enough money to effectively do so. That’s on you, not them. You are penalizing them for success.
You could take every dime from them and it would not help the national debt, and you can only do that once. We just need to spend less at every level of government. Address the problem at its source, which is spending. So dumb, dude.
Right. Change the laws. That is the point.
Don’t disagree closing the tax shelter loopholes won’t eliminate the debt by itself. It one of many changes we need to make.
professor/Cxxxxxxxx X Rxxx/Chris/Polly Pocket/Sybil/whatever,
One of your mantras is about how the talk that voter fraud is overblown. Since you seem to be in love with referencing news articles as rock hard proof of your points, here you go…
https://abc11.com/post/nc-board-elections-finds-34000-dead-people-voter-rolls/18982688/
By your standards, this source can’t be challenged.
No, I’m not saying all 34,000 dead people rose from the grave and voted. I am saying there is a good probability a much larger number then you constantly throw out did. Unlike you, I’m not saying it in a definite tone. I am saying, IMO, it is a problem and bigger then Democrats, you included, want to admit.
One line the Democrats (the (NS) Democrat Party as Alan refers to it) love to use over and over again the false argument that minorities (mostly black) are kept from voting, yet I’ve seen NO documented evidence of it. Talk is cheap, I would like to see solid evidence.
How can voter fraud be overblown….. like being a little bit pregnant…you commit voter fraud or you don’t
what if someone is pregnant with twins and one of them dies
From a single person point of view yes fraud is fraud. But on ‘the whole’ any fraud is statistically irrelevant given how infrequent it is….so why burden all for an insignificant few.
professor/Cxxxxxxxx X Rxxx/Chris/Polly Pocket/Sybil/whatever,
“But on ‘the whole’ any fraud is statistically irrelevant given how infrequent it is….so why burden all for an insignificant few.”
Really? So you consider someone, oh say an older citizen, who loses everything to fraud “insignificant”? I thought Democrats cared for folks like that. So your attitude is ‘too bad, so sad, it’s your problem’. That individual is “..statistically irrelevant…”?
My professor/Cxxxxxxxx X Rxxx/Chris/Polly Pocket/Sybil/whatever, how compassionate of you. Sounds like you are more of what you accuse Republicans of being then the Democrat you claim to be.
But hey…you be you
We were discussing the context of voter fraud. You are changing the subject. Wierd
But you be you.
#1 Scott,
Totally love the picture you’ve added. Oh for the days of $24.95 for a box of 50. (Are you old enough to remember that?)
#2 Mike Haley,
Truer words have never been spoken. Thank you.
#3 professor/Cxxxxxxxx X Rxxx/Chris/Polly Pocket/Sybil/whatever,
Note I said DOCUMENTED evidence, not “someone told my Uncle George he was told about…”. Cite your reliable source.
How did we go from your false assumption of rolls not being purged of the dead being evidence of fraud to the statement that I never made that voting laws impact black people? I have said I support voter ID in general since in NC there are still valid ways to vote if you struggle to obtain an ID.
My most recent comments have been about the SAFE act which actually places a bigger burden on women. I also comment on how it places a bigger burden on low-income and rural people which doesn’t necessarily mean black people. There is no documented study of this as of yet because it hasn’t and should be allowed to happen.
Side note, there are indeed many studies indicating a negative impact to voter turnout from ID laws but then there are also many other studies that show only minimal impact….so clearly not yet conclusive. Although a more recent Michigan Study on the subject is worth a read. It used a novel means of the testing the impact of voter ID laws. Personally, I think the topic warrants more studies to validate the Michigan methodology as more states have initiated ID laws since it was last conducted.
The study of election turnout are complicated because of the fluctuation of turnout in general. The Michigan study uses something called the CCES which is a large sample of validated voters (50,000 or average state sample of 1,000). This avoid the flaw in most studies that are ‘self-reported’ which seems to over report actual turnout by 20+%.
Look it up as it is interesting.
professor/Cxxxxxxxx X Rxxx/Chris/Polly Pocket/Sybil/whatever,
“How did we go from your false assumption of rolls not being purged of the dead being evidence of fraud to the statement that I never made that voting laws impact black people?”
Seriously? “…false assumption…”? https://abc11.com/post/nc-board-elections-finds-34000-dead-people-voter-rolls/18982688/ is a “false assumption? People are right, why do I bother even after using your favorite tactic.
Are you reading that article thinking 34000 dead people voted. Weird. Just because there are dead people on the rolls (there always will be) don’t mean anyone voted under those names. Have any examples of people voting using those names? Bet you don’t. Hence not an example of fraud.
scott yost what happened why is there a picture now? was it a glitch again
Austin Morris sent it in for me to post in the comments section due to a discussion below about ammo. I could not post in comments section so I posted it here.
ok understood. that is pretty funny
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Gentlemen, the greatest thing about the Rhino Times is that it permits real free speech. The Editor, Scott Yost, not only believes in free speech but practises it and enables it. Scott deserves great commendation for this, since so few “journalists” in positions of control actually permit it. He is a true libertarian. Thank you, Scott.
The corollary of this is that one never knows where any particular debate will go. In this case we began talking about bullets, a specific bullet actually.
Amazingly, Patrick Henry and Rebel also favour this pistol and cartridge, so I decided to dig around in my Ammo Box and found an old box of Federal Hydra-Shok 230g 45 ACP rounds – with about half left! I thought it would amuse my friends here to see the price for the box of 50 – $24.99.
It might be a few years since I bought them….
I doubted whether Scott could put up the photo I took, but he did, so you all can see it yourselves.
————
Thanks Scott, and thanks to Patrick and Rebel. I’ll be ordering some from SGAmmo Rebel – even if they’re no longer $25 a box. Thanks for the tip, Reb.
And I’m grateful that in this country we still have the right to self-defence. The Brits and Aussies and Kiwis have been disarmed.
God Bless America.
.
My sentiments exactly Austin. God Bless America, people like you, Scott, Alan, Patrick and all the other true believers on here. My driveway is about 300 yards long. Perfect long gun practice length. If you get that close my uncle Mr.Garand will be greeting you, get closer and my cousins Samuel and Dan will say hello. Like you Austin my favorite is my grandfathers 1911. Stay safe my fellow patriots.
———–
Please don’t shoot on sight, Rebel. It might only be a door-to-door salesman – like me!
———–
My favourite 1911 is my Colt Series 70 in nickel. It’s old but it shoots so sweet.
Cheers!
Austin Morris,
Mine is a Springfield Arms clone of the Army issued M1911. I carry a compact model for concealed carry. And you’re right…old but sweet
Progressive Democrats have embraced an agenda that goes beyond what’s politically, legally, and morally acceptable.
Democrats teach our kids that America was founded on racism and that our country is rotten.
Democrats insist that capitalism is evil, hate successful people, tout that hard work is for chumps, and merit is taboo.
Democrats insist that the nuclear family is tyrannical to women.
Democrats support people in Congress who believe there are six genders and think the climate crisis can be solved by eliminating cows with their flatulence, showing their detachment from reality.
Democrats think Dr. Seuss is racist, Mr. Potato Head is sexist, and children can change their genders at any time.
Democrats hate our immigration laws. They want criminal illegal aliens to roam free while ICE officers rot in jail, which should make our supporters feel a sense of urgency to defend our borders and safety.
Democrats allow gang members, drug traffickers, and terrorists to enter our country unchecked.
While Democrats performed their song-and-dance routine about the government shutdown, more than 100,000 DHS employees went without paychecks, and chaos unfolded at every airport in America.
But when a vote went to the Senate floor to withhold pay from senators during government shutdowns, Democrats blocked it. They were willing to use the paychecks of federal employees as a political pawn, but they weren’t willing to share in that sacrifice themselves.
The issue of illegal alien crime should be solved by making sure those illegal aliens aren’t allowed to remain in the country, and that they don’t illegally cross our border in the first place. Refusing to deport illegal aliens, or failing to stop them from entering the country entirely, is what the Democrats do best. They absolutely believe that illegal aliens have more rights than American citizens, and they refuse to protect us.
Everything you said Salt Life is 100% correct. Can’t wait to hear professors retort. He believes that any ILLEGAL crime no matter how heinous is just a one off thing.
I believe that every crime is representative of the individual who committed the crime, not presentative of the classification or race of that person.
More lies and misrepresentation from a conservative about what Democrats believe…..for the record as one of the few democrats on the site…..
“Democrats teach our kids that America was founded on racism and that our country is rotten”. – Nope. democrats teach that our country has a long history of racism that has had a lasting negative impact on people of color. They also teach that we have come a very long way in overcoming that racism but it still exists.
“Democrats insist that capitalism is evil, hate successful people, tout that hard work is for chumps, and merit is taboo” – Nope – democrats strongly support capitalism but believe it requires governance and regulation to avoid stepping on workers’ rights and environmental impacts in pursuit of profits
“Democrats insist that the nuclear family is tyrannical to women.” – Nope – Democrats strongly support nuclear families but also respect other types of family structures equally.
“Democrats support people in Congress who believe there are six genders and think the climate crisis can be solved by eliminating cows with their flatulence, showing their detachment from reality.” – Yes, because democrats now the difference between Sex and Gender. Yes cows add to the problem of climate but isn’t the leading problem. Just one of many things we need to consider if we want a future on the planet beyond the next couple 100 years.
“Democrats think Dr. Seuss is racist, Mr. Potato Head is sexist, and children can change their genders at any time.” – Nope. They think a book of Dr Seuss did contain racial stereotype of Asians that is today offensive but lover Sr Seuss books overall as great reading for children. Democrats don’t care about Mr Potato Head…maybe someone does but not the party itself…. No democrats don’t think children can change their gender anytime, only after careful engagement with medical professionals, parents and specialists.
“Democrats hate our immigration laws. They want criminal illegal aliens to roam free while ICE officers rot in jail, which should make our supporters feel a sense of urgency to defend our borders and safety” – Nope – Democrats think our immigrations laws are out of date and if followed allow asylum seekers too easy of access to the US and therefore we need to update immigration laws. – Nope – Democrats believe ICE agents should follow constitutional law as all other officers of the law are required. – Democrats strongly believe in strong border security and that we need to update our laws to better defend the border in a humane way.
“The issue of illegal alien crime should be solved by making sure those illegal aliens aren’t allowed to remain in the country” – Democrats strongly agree that any immigrant documented or undocumented should be deported if they commit any serious crime
Republicans blocked the democrats attempt to continue to pay airport security during the shutdown and ICE was still funded so the delay in pay sits on Republican shoulders.
Democrats only believe that long-term undocumented immigrants with a clean criminal record and a history of paying taxes deserve a path to citizenship. NOT all undocumented immigrants.
Happy to discuss any of these topics.
————
“The Prolix Professor” suffers from a chronic case of verbal diarrhea.
ad hominem
Everything becomes less stable when running out of ethical standards and sound money. Our Christian nations was built on both of those, but we chose to leave those behind. Now we just have chaos and debt.
We weren’t built as a Christian nation; we were a country built on religious freedom. I suggest we are a nation founded on faith in God but not a specific religion.
—————–
We were indeed founded as a nation built on religious freedom, and the people of the inchoate USA freely chose Christianity. Not Hindusm. Not Islam. Not Buddhism. Not Sikhism.
Christianity.
Of all the World’s religious beliefs from Atheism to Zoroastrianism, the USA has always been a Christian country.
You are incorrect. You will note that not a single document developed by the people of the inchoate USA ever included the words Christian, Christianity, Jesus, etc… anywhere in those documents. That was very intentional.
The First Amendment of the Constitution begins with, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.”
The first sentence of the first amendment makes very clear that the US was NOT founded under a specific religious doctrine.
professor/Cxxxxxxxx X Rxxx/Chris/Polly Pocket/Sybil/whatever,
I find I must, to some extent, agree with professor/Cxxxxxxxx X Rxxx/Chris/Polly Pocket/Sybil/whatever. Initially founded by a group seeking to follow Christ and God in their own way with little to no exposure to any other beliefs we have evolved into a nation of (generally) religious freedom and tolerance.
You have the right to believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster and, if it’s your desire, to worship it. It becomes a problem when you decide that I am a blasphemer and need to be made to see the error of my ways (by your standards). That is when you and I are going to have a throw down with you deciding the level. And speaking for myself I am prepared to always go one level higher then you.
Chris Quote: “Nope. democrats teach that our country has a long history of racism that has had a lasting negative impact on people of color.”
Okay, Chrissy, the Democratic Party supported the institution of slavery and wanted to expand slavery in the 1860s and beyond.
The Democratic Party has changed dramatically to a Socialist Revolutionary Party, much like Russia was in the early 1900s. Their idea is that a social revolution is necessary to bring about structural change in American society. What happened to the party of JFK and Bill Clinton? Obama and Biden happened!
Again, you illustrate a lack of understanding of the term Socialist. At no time have democrats promoted the idea of State ownership or control of production. Democrats very much support capitalism but with regulations to ensure the projections of the working class (you and me) and the environment.
I understand it is fun to use scary words like ‘socialist and Marxist’ to scare up hatred of a group of people who have a core set of beliefs that are different than yours but really it says more about you than them given your lack of appreciation for the actual definition of those words.
NY Mayor Mamdani is a proud, card-carrying socialist who ran on a platform of “free” everything. Free bus rides. Free childcare. Free, free, free. The voters of New York City heard all of this and said, Yes, please, we’d like socialism. But do these free promises really add up?
Now, Mamdani is pleading for a bailout to cover a $6 billion budget shortfall from the NY State Capital. This begs the question: how sustainable are these “free” promises when the bill comes due?
So, hey, NY taxpayers, the bill is due for all that free stuff. Will that be cash or a credit card? This should make you feel the weight of paying for promises that weren’t free.
What about Bernie?
professor/Cxxxxxxxx X Rxxx/Chris/Polly Pocket/Sybil/whatever,
Please tell me YOUR definition of a Democratic Socialist.
The left saw immigration as the answer to complete their socialist agendas. The “diversity” ideology peaked under Obama and Biden, and dictated that traditional America was still too white, traditional, Christian, unfairly successful, and too hostile to the Democratic socialist agenda. Democrats have rejected all moral principles.
Democrats support immigration as it helps drive our capitalist-based economy with an influx of skills, talent and labor. Yes, our immigration laws are outdated and grossly in need of updating to better control immigration, but Democrats lack a reliable partner in Republicans to pursue an actual solution to the challenge.
The right can only survive by misrepresenting the ideals of the left as they are unable to stand on their own beliefs as they are counter to growth, prosperity and stability. Just look as the chaos of the current administration.
But you be you
These ultra-progressive people believe in a mandated equality of results, achieved by radically high taxes on successful people and by transferring that money to unsuccessful people—an impossible dream.
Republicans are nowhere near perfect, but Democrats are actively promising to prioritize illegal aliens over American citizens. So that’s what the Democratic Party stands for. You can see it with open borders, no cash bail for evil crimes, with few indictments, and high crime rates.
We now have 53 million immigrants, legal and illegal, in the U.S. They do not assimilate or integrate like they used to. About 59% of the ungracious immigrants in the U.S. (legal & illegal) are on at least one welfare program, according to an analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies. But as NPR reported, “Immigrants come here to work. They contribute more than they take. They’re the backbone of the economy.”
In the 90s, Democrats supported closed borders, legal immigration only, and a strong national defense, values that kept America safe and balanced. Those days are gone, and now radical policies threaten our security.
Up to 600 communist groups and other radical organizations linked to the Democratic Party are mobilizing all over the country to demonstrate for May Day.
May Day is a network of communist, socialist, Marxist, and other far-left organizations, led by chapters of the Democratic Socialists of America. Sanders calls himself a Democratic Socialist. Didn’t he try to run for president?
Democratic Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) was asked by MSNBC in 2024 why Democrats aren’t pushing for a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants, and Murphy replied. “So you are right that has been the Democratic strategy for 30 years, maybe, and it has failed to deliver for the people we care about the most, the undocumented Americans that are in this country.”
Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) wants American citizens to pay reparations to illegal aliens due to stress caused by ICE.
Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) opposes voter ID laws, calling them ‘voter suppression’ that could reduce voting rolls by 5–10%. This reveals Democrats’ preference for non-citizen votes over ensuring election integrity, raising concerns about their commitment to fair elections and national security.