A letter to the editor from Rhino Times reader J. Sobran
Permit me to highlight several facts uniformly suppressed by the Mockingbird media:
The VAERS system set up by the CDC to record adverse reactions to vaccines through March of 2025 records 38,541 deaths attributed to the Emergency Use Authorization Covid jab. 220,494 hospitalizations were attributed to the jab, related to myocarditis, blood clots, neurological, and other harms. [1] A 2010 Harvard study demonstrated that only a very small portion of the actual vaccine adverse effects tended to penetrate the bureaucratic disincentives and succeed in being recorded in VAERS.
There was a drastic increase in disability (16 years and older, St. Louis Fed graph easily accessed) starting immediately after the roll out of the jab. From January 2015 till March 2021, there were about 30 million disabled with very minor fluctuation. The spike starting in April 2021 has continued such that presently there are 35 million disabled. [2]
In a BMJ Journal study of 47 Western World countries, excess mortality (all-cause mortality above the expected norm based on past years) was higher after the vaccine roll-out in 2021 and 2022 than for the Covid year (2020). [3]
This finding was confirmed by similar results in an International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine study using WHO data. [4]
As published in Bulgarian Medicine, Raphael Lataster, PhD, found that excess mortality in 31 European countries correlated positively with the rate of Covid vaccinations. Lightly vaccinated Bulgaria and Romania, for instance, had less all-cause mortality. [5]
I’ll close with something that isn’t a fact, but I suspect is true: “Plandemic” is the most censored word in the English language.
–J. Sobran
- https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
- https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNU00074597
- https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000282
- https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09246479251336610
- https://www.skirsch.com/covid/lataster.pdf
*** Right on, Sobran! We were told so many lies, weren’t we?
“Oh, the virus came from a street market in China”. – That’s strange, China has thousands of street markets and they’ve been in operation for thousands of years. Then we learned that China’s primary biological warfare research lab was in that city, and 400 yards from the market… From then on only the gullible believed that lie.
“The vaccine will protect you” and “If you get the vaccine, you won’t get COVID”. The chemical cocktails injected into millions were not and are not vaccines. The CDC even had to change to definition of “vaccine” so as to shoehorn these toxins into the definition. And no less than the then President, Joe Biden, uttered the second lie.
“The vaccines are safe and effective”. Really? Then why were the manufacturers instantly granted 100% blanket legal immunity from any and all legal liability? The “vaccines” were completely ineffective in shielding you from COVID, probably caused it to spread through “shedding”, and have caused a wave of global death and disease.
There are many more untruths that were vigorously propagated by the globalists and their acolytes in the media, who were handsomely remunerated to push the propaganda. In the end they got about 80% of the US adult population jabbed. The numbers are higher in Europe and other parts of the World.
But here’s the dirty little secret they don’t want you to know:
The jabs weren’t about COVID – – COVID was about the jabs.
Well-said on every point, Austin.
This especially deserved saying: ‘The CDC even had to change to definition of “vaccine” so as to shoehorn these toxins into the definition.’ When people start manipulating the meaning of words, they are invariably dishonest and up to no good.
Isn’t that the truth !
The Left is accomplished, deft, and subtle in altering the meaning of words, but the alteration of the very definition of vaccine was blatant and obvious. I guess they had their orders…
Thanks for the compliment!
All these studies make clear that the data sets are too small to link correlation to causation.
The disability study certainly has gaps in how it was structured to be considered scientific as of yet but certainly can warrant further study to understand the data but general consensus is other factors need to be considered.
The VAERs system was well known and specifically designed to avoid attempting to link correlation and causation as it was only ever designed to point to areas for further study (such as these you reference) but the data results themselves tell you very little by themselves.
COVID caused a great deal of change in our lives including many hospitals discontinuing elective care procedures for extended periods of time and that has been considered a significant factor in prolonged excess mortality. The other studies you have excluded are the impacts of long-covid and how it has impacted excess mortality and other long-term medical issues.
Don’t use early raw data analysis to cause misinformation. Linking correlation and causation requires far more complex studies than have been completed to date do not warrant any immediate concern.
Much more study will be required for years to really understand the impact of covid itself and yes, the vaccine as well but so far no significant negative outcomes have been directly linked to the ‘jab’.
As always, discuss the pros and cons of the covid vaccine with your personal doctor. There is a wealth of information that can be difficult to keep up with that is specifically their job to do on your behalf.
I still can’t wrap my head around the betrayal of trust from a government who were supposed to protect us during COVID.
It’s not just that everything was done wrong, but that these actions, which were known to be bad when implemented, have led us to a point where the consequences are so severe that doing nothing would have been a better course of action.
Shortly after the lockdowns in March 2020, the Department of Defense took over the COVID-19 response. Our public health leaders, who knew better, regrettably backed down —a move that can be attributed to professional weakness.
What happened to the Bill of Rights, which protects our freedoms? The unelected judiciary stood behind government lockdowns.
Where were our legislatures during the lockdown? Small businesses were shut down, and many never reopened. Many people were required to take vaccinations they did not want, and many lost their jobs for refusing the jab. These actions severely impacted our freedoms.
The CDC faced challenges during the pandemic, with some professionals feeling the need to hide in shame. The situation was such that during 2022, the head of the largest teachers’ union had significant influence over CDC guidelines regarding the healthcare of our children.
The origin of the virus, which may have been manufactured at the University of North Carolina and transported to a lab in Wuhan, China, was supported by Fauci using taxpayer dollars. Lockdowns, social distancing, school closures, and mask mandates created nightmares and were non-essential.
Severe adverse reactions occurred within weeks of the mass vaccination campaign. Still, this crucial information was, and continues to be, unjustly suppressed, leaving the public in the dark and causing a deep sense of shared frustration and indignation.
The FDA knew just before approval of the COVID shots for 12 to 17-year-olds that there were issues with myocarditis, inflammation of the heart muscle. Still, it had no impact on their considerations.
The majority of deaths didn’t happen during the height of COVID in 2020, but occurred after mass vaccinations in ‘21. ‘22, and ‘23.
A study of Cleveland Clinic employees in the spring of 2021 demonstrated that natural immunity was real and effective. Another study, conducted late in 2022 at the same institution, showed that the more COVID shots someone received, the more likely they were to contract a COVID-19 infection.
Government propaganda was meant to instill fear, deception, coercion, intimidation, and censorship, and most physicians fell prey to this tactic.
Medical Journals, which most doctors rely on, were promoting false information about treatment. It’s astonishing to consider the power of this medical industry, which can persuade governments to destroy economies and violate citizens’ rights, and then force an experimental product on billions. You can bet the World Health Organization is making plans for the next pandemic.
We will never know the exact extent of vaccine harm. What data is available, you can bet is underreported. And even if we knew the real story, the makers of vaccines are not liable for any harm that may be done.
And to those who try to diminish the level of evil that’s been done in the name of COVID, I say get your head out of the sand because we are way past buying the garbage our government and medical folks fed us. The vaccine did not stop either infection or transmission.
Do you know anyone who will now get a COVID booster? Nobody who refused the vaccine regrets not taking it.
Nine million children have received the booster because it is included on the childhood vaccine schedule in some states. Not one of them needed it. Not one of them will benefit in any way. Not one of them was at risk of dying, but many will have their immune systems damaged.
The NC Department of Health and Human Services strongly recommends, but doesn’t require, that children and adolescents receive the COVID-19 vaccine and boosters before attending school.
The reason you will never know the real hard of the vaccine is that there really isn’t any material impact. Billions of jabs yet no pile of bodies. There are a few very small percentages of issues documented but none were nearly as serious as having Covid in the first place.
But fighting misinformation (which you summarized nicely) is a waste of time given how so many have been led to disbelieve the value of science and experts in their fields due to mass distribution and repeating of unsubstantiated conspiracy theories.
But serious question: the lock down happened under Trump’s leadership. So did the rush release of the covid vaccine. How does he not get the blame with your conspiracy theories?
A bretrayal of trust. Since when has our government earned our trust? Because we have to?
Name something positive that our govt does well.
You make so many excellent points, Salt Life. The disregard for the Bill of Rights was horrible. And your point about the Dept. of Defense taking charge of Plandemic response is significant.
For sake of brevity, there was a great deal of evidence I did not get into, such as vax harms specific to women (which took up a great deal of the Pfizer report used to get the Emergency Use Authorization–well-documented by Naomi Wolfe). For instance, this study found that vaccinated women in Czechoslovakia were significantly less likely to conceive and give birth than unvaxed women:
https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202504.2487/v1?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Do you even read the studies you quote? Even in the study summary it makes clear the lake of correlation.
“..,observed association between decreased SC rates and COVID-19 vaccination is, of course, not proof of a causal relationship between vaccination and fecundability. For example, it is possible that more women who wished to become pregnant, i.e., achieve SC, chose not to be vaccinated, and/or that more women who did not plan to become pregnant opted for vaccination….”
This is how misinformation works. Someone like J Sobran grabs a ‘headline’ view of a study and using it to overstate the findings assuming people won’t read the study itself.
Heck, this study even quotes a study in the US that showed ‘no difference’ in birth rates by vax and unvaxed women who were actually trying to get pregnant versus the Czech study that looked only at birth rates without any consideration of if the women were actually trying to get pregnant.
Thank you for such a good example of how misinformation is made J Sobran.
Let’s leave the science to scientists versus angry people pushing an agenda.
So… is that like when you provided a link to a chart about crude oil production which, when examined, proved the exact opposite of what you were claiming? You assumed that no-one would get into the weeds and check it out, but for once, I did.
Your response? “Oops!”
Remember that?
Liar.
Nowhere have I said the statistical correlation is proof of causation. But on the other hand, there is a pretty clear pattern of evidence of tremendous harms from the fake vax. There are a number of other studies pointing in that direction. Even the Pfizer trials suggest higher all cause mortality weakly from the vax and more strongly suggests female problems galore.
And in this study you question, let me quote: “Conclusions: In the Czech Republic, [conception] rates were substantially lower for women vaccinated against COVID-19 … than for those who were not vaccinated.” The statement is a statement of fact. That’s data from the entire country (large numbers), where 70% of the women were vaxxed.
How can a caring person ignore the thousands of people whose lives have been ruined by the vax. Athletes who can now barely walk. Paraplegics. People with continuing blood clots. How cruel to gaslight such people and tell them it is all in their heads (as some in our fascist medical-industrial complex have done).
Without correlation AND causation, there is no proof of harm from the vaccine. Early studies such as these you provided only point to potential need invest in more comprehensive studies and make no conclusions themselves.
Even in the Czech study, they lay a range of explanations for why women who receive the vaccine chose not to have children. No where in the study did analysis indicate women WANTED to have children and couldn’t. Heck, the study even referenced a US study that isolated women attempting to have children that found NO difference in ability to get pregnant by vaxxed and unvaxxed women.
You are again showing the classic misinformation approach of now tossing in claims such as Athletes who can barely walk etc… with no basis of fact or study or data. You are just using alarmist accusations to scare people after someone points out the flaw in your conclusions based on misreading a study.
None of the studies you linked show any linkage to causation from the vax to negative outcomes. They are all just early studies showing correlation which statistically is insufficient to cause alarm. At best it is a call for more refined study. But even in most of these studies they point to several other potential (and harmless) reasons for the correlation. For example, with higher birth rates among unvaxxed women. It is most likely that women who were planning to have children were overly cautious and elected to not receive the vax versus women who were not planning on having children taking the vax. (this is actually covered in the study as a likely root cause of the correlation).
I suggest you reread the studies and really take to heart the impact of your alarmist misinformation could potential have on more gullible people.
Hey everybody, based on these comments I guess we need to add a couple of medical degrees to Chris’ extensive list of degrees.
Maybe start calling him Dr. Chris?
Nope. I have it all covered under my basic English lit and science basic studies in middle school (Jr High back in my day) as that is all it required to actually read the entire study summaries to understand both what they say and what they don’t say about the study’s results.
But funny how Alan pokes at myself for giving a full take on these studies but ignores the guy who misread them and wrote a letter about it….typical conservative hypocrisy.
But you be you
It is my fervent wish, though I know it’s unlikely, that ALL local, state, and federal public health care officials be held accountable for the unintended consequences of COVID-19 lockdowns. Their actions have had a significant impact on our children. They should be dismissed and potentially charged with malfeasance, negligence, and incompetence. Dr. Mandy Cohen should be the first to face these charges.
I think it is not fair to judge the handling of a crisis with 20/20 hindsight unless you are willing to really appreciate what was and wasn’t known at the time different decisions were made.
With 20/20 hindsight, I agree that the remote learning and kids needing to wear masks when they did finally return was an overreaction and likely did more harm than good. But for example, at that the time it was not clear if asymptomatic kids carried the virus and could also spread the virus. That was a complex question that took time to figure out with certainty. Since that information was not known, health officials advised leaders to act on the side of caution.
The harm sadly comes from the mass spreading of misinformation by people wrapped around a range of unsubstantiated conspiracy theories has certainly done more harm than good by destroying any faith in medicine and science in general. So now we have diseases like the measles making a comeback and killing kids again.
Sad.
Why not use 20/20 hindsight chris. That’s how you judge President Trump
I am actually judging Trump based on what I believe the long-term impacts will be as a result of his current actions (trade war and canceled federal research support for example). So no, I am not judging Trump using 20/20 hindsight.
There are plenty of current actions by Trump can give me great concern for the future of the United States that I don’t need to look back at his past mistakes.
Well then what do you say about Bidens mistakes in his administration. What kind of 20/20 informative information can you provide us.
The biggest mistake using 20/20 hindsight on Biden was how his administration falsely assumed inflation was strictly covid supply chain related and that it would self correct.
Plus, his mistake or running for a second term when his advisors clearly knew he wasn’t physically up for the task any longer.
Lastly, he didn’t message the economic recovery correctly and over focused on macro-economic measures while not addressing the impact of inflation on the average working family that wasn’t solved by the macro-economic trends.
That help?
The Medical-Pharmaceutical Complex worked hand-in-glove with governments and Globalists. They were very well paid to go along. The interests of the patients were irrelevant. Money talks.
Very few people see the truth, but problematically for the Davos Men, the percentage keeps on growing as people begin to understand what’s been done to them.
We who understand are called conspiracy theorists. So what? That’s how they ostracize people who shout “The Emperor has no clothes!”. It will take decades for the whole truth to come out, if it ever does.
– “What’s the difference between a Conspiracy Theory and the Truth? About two years.”
Hell, we’re still arguing about what really happened on November 22nd, 1963.
Was it a huge Psy-Op project to discover how easily Western populations could be persuaded to give up their liberty? Was it all just the precursor of Part Two?
The difference in conspiracy theory and truth is verifiable facts. Most conspiracy theories have a touch a of real verifiable facts or data but then those facts are erroneously linked to broader conclusions that are not support by verifiable facts.
So you say.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsCojnlc5FQ copy and paste
Dr. Fauci’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic failed the public, leading to a widespread sentiment that he is America’s most disliked figure.
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a highly respected physician, epidemiologist, health economist, researcher, and professor at Stanford Medical School, offers some of the following conclusions about Dr. Anthony Fauci’s actions throughout his career.
In 1983, Fauci’s unfounded statement that AIDS could be spread by contact instilled fear in many, leading to the unjust avoidance of AIDS patients. This fear directly resulted from misinformation, a mistake that has since been rectified.
In 2005, Fauci convinced the government to spend millions on a human vaccine for the Avian flu. This bird virus never spread to humans, resulting in a surplus of tens of millions of unused and unnecessary doses. This waste of resources is a clear example of the consequences of misguided decisions.
In 2011, Fauci used taxpayer-funded money for gain-of-function research, a controversial study involving making pathogens more transmissible or deadly. The goal was to learn which pathogens might leap into humans so scientists could develop vaccines and treatments for possible future pandemics.
In 2014, Fauci convinced the Obama administration to fund more gain-of-function research to identify coronaviruses in the wild and bring them into laboratories to study their potential for causing a human pandemic. Fauci’s organization funded EcoHealth Alliance, which worked with scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. In April 2020, the Trump administration canceled funding for coronavirus research.
Fauci denied using taxpayer money for research that led to the creation of Covid. We now know Fauci lied about his responsibility and involvement in the 2020 pandemic.
Fauci convinced President Trump to lock down the country, which, as we all know, was a colossal mistake and proves what can happen when one person has too much power and authority.
An article by economists from the Johns Hopkins Institute, the Cato Institute, Global Health, and Sweden’s Lund University concluded that “lockdowns have had little to no effect on COVID-19 mortality.”
The medical elites, liberal politicians, and the liberal media held us hostage over COVID-19, which has now been downgraded to flu status regarding treatment.
Fauci confessed to lawmakers that his guidelines to keep six feet of separation to limit the spread of COVID-19 “sort of just appeared” without scientific input, that paper masks would not stop transmission, and that he was wrong when he said fresh air and vitamin D from sunshine were not good for us.
Our school children suffered more from the mismanagement of COVID-19 than they would have from the exposure.
Misinformation from Fauci, the White House, and the CDC convinced millions of brilliant people that masks are an effective tool for reducing the transmission of respiratory viruses. An HHS report shows Biden-Harris spent $1 billion to push falsehoods about COVID-19 vaccines, boosters, and masks.
Fauci’s aide, David Moran, said Fauci used fake emails and burner phones to suppress Freedom of Information Act requests, which is illegal, to cover up his involvement with the Wuhan Institute.
A study co-authored by Dr. Tracy Høeg dug into the side effects of masking, a subject wholly ignored by experts and politicians desperate to exert control over individual behavior. Hoeg said there is a lack of evidence of the benefit of masking children to reduce the transmission of respiratory viruses.
The former director of the CDC, Redfield, from 2018-2021, made severe allegations against health agencies, claiming they suppressed information about significant side effects of COVID-19 vaccines. Even former CNN anchor and vaccine pusher Chris Cuomo disclosed that he has been suffering from side effects he attributes to COVID-19 vaccines.
Political leaders, including Governor Cooper and Dr. Cohen, the then-Health Secretary for NC, dictated our actions based on non-scientific methods. In an interview with Duke University, Cohen laughed about lockdowns and admitted that some of her decisions were based not on her science knowledge but on actions from colleagues in other states. Never forget or forgive these folks.
It’s essential that we, as a society, remain vigilant and well-informed. We must not allow bureaucratic experts to use “government science” to lie to us or curtail our constitutional rights ever again. The skeptics were right about COVID-19, and the experts were wrong.
More misinformation about a great scientist by people angry about covid and an inability to reflect on how science works.
In 1983, the AIDs virus was just isolated (i.e. discovered0 and like with the early times of COVID, much was not yet understood so science always takes the overly cautious approach. Like with covid before they understood how long the virus lived on surfaces they recommended cleaning all public surfaces regularly. Only much later were studies able to conclusively determine that the virus had a very should viable life outside of the body.
2005 again this is an exercise in caution given the ramification of a bird flu epidemic which would have potentially be far worse than covid.
COVID origin conspiracy theory is an example of people taking evidence to fit the accusation and ignoring any alternative story line. While certainly possible that covid started from a lab leak it is not proven or verified as fact. All the ‘smoking guns’ conspiracy theorist claim to have all have reasonable explanations. Just another example of people needing a scape goat.
The mask debate is an interesting one. No one claimed masks were ‘the solution’ but the argument was always it was one of many precautions that together they hoped slowed the spread so hospitals could keep up with demand. Which worked overall as once the protective measures went into effect, hospitals were far better at managing the massive spike in demand for covid patient treatments.
The challenge (and silliness) of having kids wear masks was that they would never wear them properly to be anything close to effective. Heck even most adults refused to wear them properly so given their limited effectiveness even if worn properly, they were not effective. But not by lack of trying. This one I admit that we need to assume the trend went on far too long.
There has been no suppression of vaccine side effects except for misinformation regarding the purpose and use of VAERS data. VAERS data is raw data that intentionally has no link to causation and has been explain at nauseum to conspiracy theorist and misinformation propogandists. Here is a good article on the subject: https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2022/what-vaers-is-and-isnt [it also includes good examples of known side effects and how they determined they didn’t warrant not receiving the jab]
It’s essential that we, as a society, remain confident in our scientific community and allow experts in their fields to guide policy on complex topics such as pandemics. Without them, the consequences of the pandemic would have been far worse. It is only the success of their advice and actions that allow people with 20/20 hindsight to be critical of the actions taken during a time of great uncertainty as the process of study and analysis of a new virus is imperfect and took time to handle in the face of great public pressure.
The experts weren’t wrong. They were just limited by time and effort required to drill down the factual analysis of a very small and changing organism that was swiftly moving through our society and overwhelming our hospitals. I guess to many people aren’t ready to actually understand how science works. It doesn’t give quick easy answers just because you want it to. At best it gives you probabilities in the face of a wide range of variables. Some variables being better understood than others. With virus it is especially complex as the variable continuously change over time as the virus mutates. So, it can be challenging to understand for those not studied on the topic. Hense the importance of the scientific community.
Your own comment indicates that the experts were wrong.
Sure. That’s how science works. It takes time and study of data to determine the complex behavior of a virus. Until they have the data to analyze, they take the cautious approach. For example the cleaning of surfaces. It took time to study the virus’s life span on different types of surfaces under different controlled circumstances I assume so prior to conclusive studies (i.e. multiple peer reviewed studies) they errored on the side of caution.
It was the same with masks, asymptomatic infections, long-covid, etc… All these took time. Some turned out to not be an issue or not as effective as hoped but early decisions all sided on the idea of caution.
That is how science works. It takes time and study and verification of studies to be conclusive.
One other interesting note is that with public health it is not possible to have control groups who are encouraged to ignore caution and risk significant health impacts so the ability to run controlled studies is off the table leaving more difficult and less accurate population analysis. This was the case with masks.
So the experts weren’t wrong. They just didn’t have the data yet to know.
A brilliantly concise and incisive summation of the fraudster Fauci, and the damage he caused .
Future generations will look back and ask how this happened in America.
The study of misinformation will certainly be studies for generations and will only get worse sadly.
But… ” ….that’s how science works” – (Chris, 2025/5/18 08:31).
Right?
Fauci is the modern Nazi Doctor of death
Joseph Mengele Fauci should be tried as a
Criminal
Navigating a fast-moving pandemic with evolving science, public fear, political division, and global uncertainty was no easy task. While no response was perfect, Fauci provided steady, science-based guidance in an incredibly complex and polarized environment. Comparing that work to Nazi doctors—who committed horrific human rights abuses—is just a childish take fed by anger and misinformation from conservative propaganda. Maybe you should go outside and play with the other kids.
You’re right, Rebel. Fauci believed he was so smart that he could farm out this research to UNC-CH and WIV and he’d never be associated with it.
He was wrong.
He is culpable on many levels.
Karen Kingston is a biotech analyst and former Pfizer employee who is back with some grotesque news about what the US government knew about the CV19 bioweapon vax. They knew it was not safe at all, and the FDA also knew Pfizer committed fraud to get the CV19 injections approved. Kingston says, ‘This is the government’s words exactly: “The FDA was aware of the protocol violations.”’ So, the FDA was aware of the fraud that was reported . . . before it granted emergency use authorization (EUA) for its vaccine. They were aware of the fraud.
Right. And remember how Pfizer tried to bury their test results for 75 years?
She has long ago been debunked.
https://www.verificat.cat/en/mrna-vaccines-do-not-carry-graphene-in-their-lipid-nanoparticles/
What’s scary is that Western governments employed exactly the same messaging, strategies, and restrictions, from “Build Back Better” to “A pandemic of the unvaccinated” (which was a blatant lie). That kind of co-ordination is not a coincidence.
The COVID pandemic was just Part One. You may have read about a global treaty giving the World Health Organization the power to DETERMINE DOMESTIC POLICY within nation states in the event of another “health emergency”. This treaty has been ratified in many countries. The purpose of this is to give political cover to the leaders of individual nations as they impose the next, more draconian lockdown and other egregious violations of our freedom. The Prime Ministers and Chancellors will shrug, and bleat that it is simply required by the WHO Treaty. This is how they will debase our rights, making them into privileges. Suddenly you’ll have to beg permission to travel more then 15 Kilometers (the actual limit in Germany) from your home. Freedom of movement will become a privilege, not a right. This is also the reason for he promotion of “15 Minute Cities”, a concept much more advanced in Europe than here. And their war on the private automobile, in favor of “public transportation”.
—–
It’s about control, total control. The depopulationist globalists are imposing neo-feudalism. It requires the marginalization of the nation state, the adulteration and anesthetization of Western populations, and the complicity of their leaders. Until last July the Prime Minister of the UK was an open acolyte of the World Economic Forum, having been declared one of their Young Global Leaders. Today’s leaders are more circumspect about their globalist affiliations… but they’re nearly all on board.
Thank God for Trump, and the irascible independence of the American people. But if I was him, I’d employ a food taster (the former FBI head even feels secure enough to call for his assassination in a recent cryptic but obvious public message). This is how powerful these people are. As always, America is the last best hope.
We have to fight them.
Austin I never got the clot shot nor wore a mask just continued my life as normal. I won’t ever have an electric vehicle and I’ll give up my guns when the ammunition is all gone
Thank God for Americans like you. Some of them Limeys ain’t too bad neither….
It’s impressive you could put that much ignorance in just one statement.
I defer to you when it comes to ignorance and vacuity. In that at least, you know whereof you speak.
Since we are speaking of “jabs”, in a just world, I believe Chris’ response to Austin should be “Touche” [accent over the ‘e’].
D’accord.