When President Donald Trump met with the head of Taiwan Semiconductor on Monday, March 3 to announce a $100 billion investment in American chip factories in the next few years, the North Carolina furniture business wasn’t expected to be a topic of conversation; however, Trump made some remarks that day that, if accurate, should make a lot of people in High Point and other past furniture centers in North Carolina happy.
Taiwan Semiconductor’s business is likely to end up in Arizona, but the president took some time to speak about what he expects to see happen due to tariffs he’s already placed on Canada, Mexico and China – and the ones he intends to add to many other countries on April 2.
Trump said Taiwan Semis’ investment was due to his tariffs and said there will be a lot of other exciting similar announcements in the future, including ones that pertain to North Carolina.
“And so, I think it’s going to be very exciting,” the president said in the televised meeting from the Roosevelt Room in the White House about 3 p.m. on Monday. “Very exciting for the automobile companies. Very exciting for – I can think of any – as an example, North Carolina, they had the great – I used to go there to buy furniture for hotels, and it’s been wiped out.”
Between 1999 and 2009, North Carolina’s furniture manufacturing industry lost more than half of its jobs.
In that one decade alone, the North Carolina furniture industry lost over half of its jobs due to low-cost furniture imported from mostly China and other Asian countries. The US-China Bilateral Trade Agreement, signed in November 1999 lowered US tariff barriers and eased the way for China to join the World Trade Organization. At that time, proponents of the agreement predicted that it would have a relatively modest effect on US manufacturing imports and jobs.
However, the impact was much greater than anticipated and the city of High Point was particularly hard hit.
But this week, Trump said that, in the long run, the new tariffs will improve things for the US.
North Carolina led the nation in the number of workers displaced from their jobs because of U.S. trade policies.
The High Point Market – formerly the International Home Furnishings Market and the Southern Furniture Market – is the largest home furnishings industry trade show in the world; so, it’s not surprising that Trump used to go there to select some furniture for his properties.
He said Monday, “That business all went to other countries, and now it’s all going to come back into North Carolina — the furniture manufacturing business.”
Trump is arguing that, since Americans will have to pay higher prices for furniture from other countries once the tariffs are in place, furniture makers will choose to open shop in the US.
Not everyone is as convinced as Trump that tariffs will be a panacea that cures all ills.
The president ran largely on lowering prices on eggs and other items in the US, but most economists believe the tariff will exacerbate the increasing inflation rate that just recently began to uptick again.
During the presidential campaign late last year, Trump promised repeatedly that, when he won, he would bring prices down “starting on day one.”
That hasn’t happened, however, and many are concerned that the tariffs will make the problem of inflation worse.
In February, inflation ceased its downward trend and crept up half a percentage point, the largest monthly increase in nearly two years.
So, the country is split on the president’s new tariff war on allies and enemies alike.
Those who believe Trump think it will bring a lot of new business to America and old business back to America, while others argue that taking what’s likely to be an inflationary measure. at a time when people are already suffering from very high prices, isn’t a very good idea.
Here is Trump’s argument on tariffs which he presented Monday when Taiwan Semiconductor made its announcement: “What they’ll have to do is build their car plants, frankly, and other things in the United States — in which case, they have no tariffs. In other words, you build — and this is exactly what Mr. Wei [the head of Taiwan Semiconductors] is doing by building here. Otherwise, they’ll build — if they did them in Taiwan to send them here, they’ll have 25 percent or 30 percent or 50 percent or whatever the number may be someday. It’ll go only up. But by doing it here, he has no tariffs, so he’s way ahead of the game.”
As usual Trump is making stuff up with no basis in fact. TSMC was promised $6.6 billion in funding under the Biden-era CHIPS and SCIENCE Act of 2022, I am sure the Chips Act was the tool that brought this plant to the US, not tarrifs which can be added and removed at a moments notice.
The idea that someone will invest the millions in dollars of required to build a factory in the US because of tariffs is just stupid. Not to mention that building furniture in the US is expensive and would drive up cost of furniture.
Trump is an idiot. Anyone who thinks a trade war is a good idea for US consumers is a sucker.
Tariffs worked prior to the War Between the States. Tariffs hurt the cotton growers of the South but helped the industries of the North/Northeast. Tariffs were a big deal in the 1850s. The South thought tariffs were unfair and were imposed to help the manufacturers of the North, which it did. Without receiving relief from the federal government, the South exercised its legal right to secede. At that time, secession was an accepted belief. Tariffs have been used for a long time to gain advantage for the home team. In the case of the 1800 tariffs, one result was higher prices at home, which will be the result of Trump’s tariffs. The question is are Americans open to higher prices to protect domestic manufacturing, or is Walmart shopping more important? Time will tell.
these ‘tariffs’ collected by our guvmnt for guvmnt & are just another sly tax on amerikan consumers.
these ‘tariffs’ collected by our guvmnt for guvmnt & are just another sly tax on amerikan consumers.
———–
“Suckers… idiots… stupid…” – Chris.
Can you see why you are so disliked and dislikeable? You’ll never win over people by insulting them..
But you be you.
Says they guy who calls me names on a daily basis. The hypocrisy never stops with conservatives.
Yes, I do, but I’m just returning fire. YOU initiate the insults against everybody, every time, so it’s rich to complain when you get your own medicine back.
Your rudeness is reciprocated.
Don’t you understand that?
I don’t complain. I just call out your hypocrisy. I don’t have thin skin like Trump and Alan do.
Let’s be fair, TSMC, original investment was initiated by Trump’s 1st term efforts, expanded by Biden’s efforts, and expanded again by Trump’s 2nd term efforts. There is plenty of credit for each and an amazing example of what happens when one administration actually builds on the efforts of the other….imagine that !!
The initial $12 billion Arizona factory announcement in May 2020 occurred under Trump’s first administration. This decision followed U.S. lobbying to diversify global tech supply chains away from China. While Trump did not impose tariffs on Taiwanese chips during his first term, the strategic push to “reshore” manufacturing laid the groundwork. This $12 billion represents the direct result of Trump’s pre-Biden efforts.
The CHIPS Act incentivized TSMC to expand its initial $12 billion commitment to $65 billion by April 2024, adding two more factories in Arizona. The $6.6 billion subsidy directly offset the higher costs of U.S. manufacturing (estimated at 30% more than in Taiwan), making the expansion viable. The difference between the initial $12 billion and the $65 billion total—$53 billion—can be largely attributed to the CHIPS Act’s financial and policy support. However, some of this expansion was built on the momentum from 2020, so not all $53 billion is solely due to the Act.
The $100 billion investment announced in 2025 appears directly tied to Trump’s tariff strategy in his second term. While TSMC had already committed $65 billion, the additional $100 billion aligns with Trump’s stated goal of using tariffs as a “negative incentive” to force investment. TSMC’s decision to add five new facilities suggests a response to avoid punitive import duties, though it also builds on prior U.S. expansion plans
Each phase built on the previous, with Trump’s initial vision, Biden’s subsidies, and Trump’s renewed tariff leverage playing distinct yet interconnected roles in TSMC’s U.S. expansion and the total investment to date of $165 billion.
i did miss the story dating back to Trump’s first term. It is great to see good public policy continue between the hand off of power between parties. Too bad Trump wants to cancel the Chips act for reasons i don’t understand other than guess he hates anything Biden.
I don’t see the linkage to the tariffs other than timing….the writing has long been on the wall that the US views Chip manufacturing as strategic to national security and brining it on shore is critical. TSMC noted that aggressive expansion had much to do with growing demand of the new generation of chips. Tariffs are temporary and no one invests billions of $ based on political winds that change every 4 years. TSMC will let Trump promote the move anyway he likes as we know it will toss a country under the bus if they don’t suck up to him personally.
Did anyone consider that supporting TSMC is a strategy against China. If there is a presence of a large chip manufacturing in Taiwan, there is reason to defend Taiwan and, therefore, is less likely of a Chinese invasion. The communist party has a serious desire to invade Taiwan. For one reason, the communist party considers Taiwan as part of mainland China and for the other reason, Taiwan is where Chaing Kai-shek (love that name) and his followers escaped to in 1949 after fighting and losing to Mao Zedong.
The fear of China invading Taiwan is WHY we need the Chips act. It was why it was implemented is it not?
I don’t think many people in either party support us going to war with China over Taiwan. The bluff game isn’t going to last forever.
The U.S. has been implementing tariffs since its founding in 1789. One of the first major laws passed by Congress was the Tariff Act of 1789, which imposed duties on imports to generate revenue for the new federal government and protect domestic industries.
Throughout U.S. history, tariffs have been used for different purposes—sometimes to protect American businesses (like during the Tariff of 1816 and the Smoot-Hawley Tariff of 1930) and other times to encourage free trade (such as with the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934 and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1947).
If you don’t like it here, we have borders that law-abiding citizens are free to cross on their way out.
Right. Targeted tariffs can protect existing industry if used sparringly enough to not trigger a trade war. Broad across the board tariffs most certainly cause a trade war that hurts everyone.
The is no historical example of tariffs restoring industry as Trump thinks will happen.
But at least the market keeps reminding Trump how bad trade wars can be and so he reversed yet again
Weird he thought the markets wouldn’t notice his broad across the board tariffs the second time…..or did his old age mess up his memory and he forget what happened last month? Weird.
we need more local furniture production for americans uninterested/unable to reproduce & reverse our population decline ? while vigorously discouraging immigrants ? sell our output overseas in markets now selling to us ? why would THEY buy/need it ?
Chris you are correct 100%
I think I agree with you on this one, but not in such harsh terms.
Uhhhh. We need the wood for the furniture….think through the entire process
we have a thriving furniture industry: ‘boomers’ in basement/garages !
Those jobs are long gone.
I am taking a wait and see attitude on this one. As for Chris’ comment, to me it sounds like the ravings of the (NS)DP from Tuesday night.
I get it, you struggle with elementary school social studies so economics 101 must be way too much.
But you be you
Ok Chris. Whatever you say. Here’s one for you to ponder on. SC is scheduled to fulfill a death penalty case tomorrow by firing squad ( inmates choice) so what is cheaper for taxpayers 20-30 more years at 80k+ or the cost of 3 bullets ( about $5). Very heinous murder to which the defendant admitted to I know you don’t believe in the death penalty, but personally I think this one should be televised so criminals (illegals) can see the consequences of their actions. But you keep being you.
Ok. Weird. But ok. Good on you.
Explain what is weird Chris
Weird because we were discussing tariffs / economics.
Keep on insulting us, and putting us down, buddy.
That’s the plan.
Chris do you mean to say you don’t keep up with current events such as this, when a couple months ago you were a staunch opponent of the death penalty. Weird but again you be you
No, I am saying it is weird to toss that statement into the middle of a discussion about tariffs.
But sure, I don’t support death penalty. It’s ineffective, overly expensive and I consider life without parole as a worse punishment. But I am not that passionate about it to be honest.
. . . only if new home builders start ‘furnishing’. tiny furniture for ‘tiny homes’ & ‘units’. sing: oh, give me a ‘unit’ where the buffalo roam, where the deer & the antelope play . . .
. . . only if new home builders start ‘furnishing’. tiny furniture for ‘tiny homes’ & ‘units’. sing: oh, give me a ‘unit’ where the buffalo roam, where the deer & the antelope play . . .
And the fool has to undo what everyone said was dumb to begin with…..what an embarrassment.
I suggest clean up and voice his knowledge rather than insults. Comments are for the story not insults to others who have an opinion. While the Rhino has always been a little lax on comments, the ONE always comes, and Chris is IT. I suggest if his comments are about the article, fine but if they are insults thrown at others, who are allowed to have an opinion, he be BANNED. He sounds like someone who is ready to BLOW. So he needs to Blow Off at insulting others.
Trust me Sun. Chris gets as much abuse as he dishes out. Probably more.
Yes Scott, but he deserves it because he is the one who initiates the rudeness, and the insults, and the put-downs. He even admits – right here in black & white – that that’s his plan, or MO (Comment above, dated March 6, 10:14pm).
Last month you published a Letter of mine that did not interest him, and the debate and discussion was civil and respectful – and just as stimulating. No insults, no ad hominem attacks, no smears, no prejudice…. no Chris. Just honest and forthright debate, without the odious, venomous one poisoning the well.
Sun is right.
Austin, I also like it when the level of discourse is elevated, but every time I take down a comment because it is over the line rude, I get complaints that I am censoring free debate. Scott.
Well it’s not censorship because it’s not being imposed by government, but rather by a private sector business that has the right to delete anything, as it sees fit, in its own publication.
When government pressures privately owned public forums to delete speech – as Biden did to Meta/Facebook – THAT IS censorship.
And I do not want Chris banned. As a libertarian I’m not a banning kind of guy. Let him speak. None of us who cherish free and forthright debate would want him gone. However, it would be much more enriching if we had an intellectually honest Leftist to debate with, but we’ll have to settle for this little demagogue for now. I do wish he were less vituperative though.
Lol, are you really playing the who started it game? I haven’t played that game since I was in elementary school.
To me it’s just good fun and a place to vent against the ideals of the Trump movement that frustrate me such as anit-science misinformation. (which is what got me engaged her back when covid hit). But mostly it’s the continous rhetoric that democrats want to destroy America and calling liberals communists and Marxist etc… (see Alan rhetoric) that have kept me here…..so ‘the plan’ is to keep pushing back against such rhetoric.
Call it a hobby. Lol
As always. You be you.
————
But you ARE the one who always drags down the debate, aren’t you?
Everyone here agrees. Just read the other comments.
You are the problem.
Says the guy who can’t reply to my comments without including personal insults. Lmao. More hypocrisy. Not shocked.
Sun, a correction to my previous entry
“Yes, I’m human and moat gets gotten now and then.” I meant to say “Yes, I’m human and my goat gets gotten now and then.”
My apologizes
But most of us are tired of it. Rudeness and approval of it makes many of us not want to bother reading your paper. You are the one that suffers in the end.
Sun It’s called free will. You can choose to read or not read the comments here
Free Will
Sun,
My grandpa always told me it’s better to keep one’s mouth shut and be thought a fool then to open it and confirm what it.
I tried giving my friend Alan some advice which he followed for a while but then allowed himself to be drawn back in. He has told me he’ll give it another try (I’m waiting to see).
As to your comment, we, as a country, have the right of free speech given to us by God, the Constitution, and my brothers and sisters in arms over the years, but nowhere is it written that you have to have a modicum of smarts to exercise it. It’s better to let him rant, rave, and spout his nonsense and after the tantrum is over, return to a real conversation with real adults. Have I lost my decorum from time to time? Yes, I’m human and moat gets gotten now and then.
A humorous FYI…in the Army we used to have a saying…if the troops are bitching, they’re fine, but when they get quite, back slowly out of the room.
If it helps, I agreed with Alan’s recent LTE.
When he plays nice with me, I will return the favor. But Alan is the perfect example of a person who tosses around socialist, communist, Marxist, etc… as an insult to people who disagree with his political point of view with no concern with that those word actually mean. So I am here to push back.
When he grows up, I will grow up. Until then it’s just good fun for me as a place/person to vent against all the BS rhetoric from the right that use fear mongering BS that people like me are out to destroy America.
If his feelings are getting hurt from banter online, maybe I shouldn’t wait for him to grow up. But good for you looking out for the old boy.
—–
It’s not the BS you spout that we have a problem with. We all deal with it every single day as we watch TV, listen to NPR, or read the News & Record.
It’s your personality.
Well, for me is your and Alan’s rhetoric, misinformation, ignorant (unsubstantiated) statements AND your personalities that bug me. Lol.
But you be you. 🙂
Keep laughing at your own jokes, buddy. You’re a sorry little loser.
Lmao….
From Chris’ reply to Patrick Henry above
“If it helps, I agreed with Alan’s recent LTE.”
From Chris’ reply to my letter from 6/6/25
“More hypocrisy and fake rage from Alan and the conservative party.”
There’s a word for these contradictory statements but it’s currently escaping me…could someone help me here?
Chris does not respect truth, so he can change his position on a dime. He is not here to engage in honest debate, in the furtherance of truth. He is here to score points, so he can feel better about himself.
He will distort, twist, and disfigure truth, reality, and comments in order to achieve what he considers a rhetorical victory. Worse still, his sophistry is always mixed with a venomous bigotry and hatred towards those who disagree with him. He cannot disagree without being disagreeable. That’s why he is so disliked and despised.
Wrong letter. I agreed with your letter about a super majority being required for change in taxes.
The fake rage letter is your standard conservative hypocrisy where you criticize dems for the same actions commonly done by Republicans where you remained silent.
But you be you.
I disagree with everyone one. I think that something positive can be learned from every person you get to meet. At the least, these comments tell you what people are thinking, even though much of it wouldn’t be mentioned in public.