Not everyone in Guilford County government is going along to get along with Chairman of The Guilford County Board of Commissioners Skip Alston and his merry band of big spenders. There are still two Republicans on the board and, when the seven Democratic commissioners voted on the 2025-2026 fiscal budget, the two explained in detail why they were worried about it and why they couldn’t support it.

On Thursday night, June 19, the Guilford County Board of Commissioners voted 7-2 to adopt the county’s new budget – a giant spending plan that will be in effect from July 1 to June 30 of next year. But while the board’s seven Democrats gave the budget their enthusiastic support, the two Republicans – Commissioners Alan Perdue and Pat Tillman – voted no, citing long-term fiscal concerns and what they see as missed opportunities to right-size Guilford County government.

Under Democratic rule in recent years, the board has spent the county’s savings account down to dangerous levels, taken over $3 billion in debt, given out hefty raises to all county employees, vastly expanded some departments, and, the last time the county needed to buy a fleet of cars, they had to do so on credit.

The truth is that, things are getting so tight when it comes to the county’s money, even some Democratic commissioners in recent months have expressed concerns as to how certain wants would be paid for.

At the June 19 meeting, Commissioner Perdue praised the board’s process and hard work, but said he simply could not support the final product.

“My vote tonight reflects my responsibility to advocate for fiscal discipline and protection of our taxpayers – not just this year, but next year and beyond,” Perdue said. “We’re facing property revaluation next year, and without tightening our belts now, we may be setting ourselves up for a significant tax increase going forward on families and property owners.”

After the revaluation goes into effect next year, the average home property value is expected to be 50 percent higher than it currently is assessed – and the current plan of the Democrats seems to be to leave the tax rate where it is after that revaluation and rake in an astronomical amount of new taxpayer money with the 2026 and after tax bills.

Perdue said Guilford County government is growing too fast in areas that don’t directly serve citizens.

“We remain top-heavy in several key administrative areas,” Perdue, the former longtime Emergency Services director, said. “And we’re growing faster in those areas than the need being served.”

While he acknowledged that the budget included “some really good things” – like more money for school maintenance, school safety, public safety, mental health services, and the Family Justice Center – Perdue said the overall budget missed the mark when it comes to sustainability and discipline.

“Our citizens expect us to manage the county’s checkbook much like they manage their own household budgets – by planning ahead, cutting excess and saving where possible,” he said. “Before we take more from taxpayers, I think it’s important that we show we’ve tightened our belt to reduce waste and prioritize wisely.”

Commissioner Pat Tillman, who also voted no, echoed many of the same concerns that Perdue had and Tillman also praised county staff for their long hours and hard work on the budget.

However, Tillman then said that, over his three-plus years on the board, he’s seen a troubling trend: a growing county government that shows no sign of slowing down.

“There are so many positives in it,” he said of the budget on the table. “But there are also ways I believe we could reduce the size and the scope of government. As I’ve been on the board three-plus years, I don’t think we’ve done that.”

Tillman said he worries about where the money is coming from – specifically, the county’s use of recurring funds and reliance on the general fund, which is essentially the county’s savings account.

It’s a basic rule of good governance not to use one-time funds for recurring costs. But the current board has done so year after year, which is why the savings account has for the first time at least in this century fallen below the 8 percent of the budget mark that state oversight officials consider the bare minimum reserve any local government should have on hand.

Tillman said the commissioners are “taking from pots of money” that aren’t going to be recurring and spending that money on programs and initiatives “that aren’t going to go away.”

“And I do believe that we need to further lessen our dependence on our general fund,” he added.

Tillman, who said he votes based on “my conscience, my constituents, and the community that I serve,” added that voting no wasn’t a decision he made lightly.

“I do appreciate all the work,” he said, “and respectfully, as Quakers say, I stand aside on this vote.”