Downtown Greensboro’s long-running list of complaints – parking headaches, vandalism, homeless encampments, business closures and fewer customers wandering Elm Street during the workweek – has now produced another response from downtown leadership: an emergency fund that’s meant to help small businesses survive unexpected damage.
Downtown Greensboro Inc. announced on Wednesday, May 27, that it’s launching a new “Emergency Stabilization Fund” that will reimburse qualifying downtown businesses up to $2,000 a year for vandalism, forced-entry repairs, graffiti removal and other unexpected property damage.
The fund is aimed specifically at small, street-level businesses located inside the Downtown Greensboro Business Improvement District.
The timing of the new program is notable because it comes during one of the roughest public stretches downtown Greensboro has experienced in years.
Downtown business owners have spent months publicly complaining about parking confusion, homelessness, safety concerns, construction headaches and declining customer traffic. Several high-profile downtown businesses have also shut down recently – fueling growing concerns that downtown Greensboro has become a harder place for small businesses to survive.
Now DGI is essentially acknowledging another growing reality downtown: sometimes businesses are getting hit with costs they simply weren’t expecting.
“A broken window or act of vandalism can be the difference between a small business staying open or shutting its doors,” Interim DGI Executive Director Rob Overman stated in the announcement. “This fund fills the gap when insurance and cash reserves fall short, so owners can focus on running their business instead of absorbing the hit.”
The fund is designed as a reimbursement program. Business owners first pay for the repairs themselves and then apply to DGI for reimbursement.
According to the program guidelines, eligible businesses can receive up to $2,000 once per calendar year depending on repair costs and available funding. Businesses must have fewer than 50 employees and have to be located at street level inside the downtown business district.
The program covers a fairly broad list of emergency-type repairs.
Eligible expenses include repairing or replacing broken windows and doors, fixing damaged drywall and flooring after forced entry, repairing storefront framing, emergency board-up services, graffiti removal and locksmith services tied to break-ins.
One particularly interesting provision buried in the guidelines allows limited assistance for emergency relocation expenses if a downtown business has to move to another location within the Downtown BID district. That assistance could include help with a deposit or down payment for another storefront.
Programs like this aren’t usually created during boom times. Nobody launches an “Emergency Stabilization Fund” because everything’s going swimmingly.
The new fund comes after months of increasingly public frustration about downtown conditions. Earlier this year, downtown business owners and residents used a Greensboro City Council meeting to unload their complaints about parking, safety issues and homeless activity downtown. Some owners argued that downtown’s biggest problem isn’t about marketing – it’s the fact that customers simply don’t want the hassle anymore.
Downtown business owner Kim Grimsley-Ritchy summed up the frustration bluntly during one of those public discussions when she said: “People know where downtown is. They are choosing not to go because the experience no longer works for them.”
At the same time, a series of business closures rattled downtown Greensboro.
M’Coul’s Public House closed after nearly 25 years downtown. Dame’s Chicken & Waffles shut down its downtown location. Liberty Oak, which had been part of downtown Greensboro for decades, also closed its doors. Others have shuttered as well.
None of those businesses closed specifically because of vandalism or broken windows. However, the atmosphere surrounding downtown clearly has made business owners nervous.
And while city leaders have repeatedly emphasized that downtown Greensboro is still vibrant and growing, they’ve also been rolling out one response after another in order to calm concerns.
The city recently announced expanded free parking hours downtown, clearer parking signage, better enforcement consistency and possible parking validation programs after hearing steady complaints from business owners and customers. The city has also highlighted that Greensboro provides more than 4,400 public parking spaces downtown – although many visitors still complain that finding convenient parking can feel much harder than it should.
Officials have also increased downtown police visibility through the Greensboro Police Department’s Center City Resource Team.
Now DGI is adding this financial backstop for businesses that get hit with vandalism or damage.
Interestingly, the program guidelines repeatedly use phrases like “outside the business’s control,” “unexpected situations,” and “funding source of last resort.”
That wording matters because it frames the issue less as isolated bad luck and more as something downtown leaders believe is happening often enough to justify a standing emergency fund.
This new fund won’t cover rent, payroll, routine maintenance, inventory theft, lost revenue or cosmetic improvements. Businesses also must first pursue insurance claims before DGI will reimburse expenses. The organization says the fund is intended to fill gaps not covered by insurance or cash reserves.
Applications will ultimately be reviewed by the DGI Board of Directors, which retains final discretion over awards. Funding is also limited to whatever amount DGI has budgeted annually for the program.
So, there’s not an unlimited pot of money.
Still, even a relatively small reimbursement could matter to some businesses. For a small downtown retailer operating on thin margins during a slow month, a surprise $1,500 repair bill can become a real problem.
Some businesses are already operating on thin margins due to other problems. Construction projects have disrupted traffic patterns. Parking rules have changed repeatedly in recent years. Some downtown workers who once helped drive weekday foot traffic are still working remotely at least part of the time. Rising food and labor costs have hit restaurants particularly hard.
Meanwhile, homelessness remains one of the most sensitive and emotionally charged issues surrounding downtown Greensboro.
DGI’s new Emergency Stabilization Fund appears to be an attempt to reassure small business owners that downtown leadership understands at least some of the problems they’re currently facing – and that city leaders don’t want one act of vandalism, or one unexpected repair bill, becoming the final straw that pushes another downtown business to close its doors.

This program makes no sense. What makes sense is to have a policy that vandals will be caught and punished. There should be no tolerance for vandalism and certainly not a fund whereby the vandalism damage is paid for with taxes, and taxes it is. Install cameras and when a vandal is caught, plaster the vandal’s photo on the city’s website with a request to help find the offender. If I were a street level business owner, I would prefer that law enforcement stop the vandalism rather than a program that reimburses the cost of damage. That is letting the vandal off the hook and may encourage more vandalism. Vandalism involves far more than the cost of repair. Bad idea.
Agree 100%
Thanks Zack for your contribution to downtown.
I am responding again since Scott does not appear to appreciate my original response…can’t please everyone. Why would tax money be used to pay out-of-pocket expenses to anyone who has suffered a loss from an act of vandalism? It appears to me that Downtown Greensboro Inc. is trying to (1) assuage the business owner and (2) to give cover to the police and City Council for not doing their job. If vandalism was only about reimbursement of expenses incurred, then the idea might work. However, it is about much, much more than recouping the cost of repair. What about the trauma experienced by the business owner, what about the time and effort of getting repairs made, what about the time spent to file an insurance claim, and the time to recoup out-of-pocket expenses from Downtown Greensboro Inc.?
Being a small business owner is hard work even on a good day. Sometimes just keeping the doors open is a challenge. I get it. But don’t let City Council and the police off the hook by transferring a feel-good reimbursement program. This does not fix the vandalism problem, nor does it soften the blow when it happens. Putting more police on the streets is a logical step to doing something positive to address the problem.
TERMLIMITS,
Your last paragraph makes your point clear and inarguable, IMO. Residents of the Keeps run by the various Lords and Ladies of the High Council mean nothing to them and while they will continue to what they are doing, that being trying to turn Greensboro into a miniature version of the Socialist experiment previously known as NYC.
Until We the People rise up and take back the reins of control from the overseers and replace them with TRUE representatives GSO will continue down to this path, which I personally believe is being guided by the Omnipotent One and sycophants of the Board of Commissars.
Personal note…go ahead professor/Cxxxxxxxx X Rxxx/Chris/Polly Pocket/Sybil/whatever, start with your accusations of paranoia and ignorance. I’m sure somewhere in your file folders of ‘college degrees’ you have one applicable.
What about all the people who do not come to the inner city at all? There are PLENTY of choices in the city & county.
The only reason I would go the vandaland is because I have to. And Greensboro is my hometown, I grew up here, lived here most of my life. “No mas amor, aqui.”
Right response should be:
1.) Prevent vandalism in the first place.
2.) Business should have insurance to cover vandalism.
3.) Make the culprit pay for the vandalism. If they can’t pay, make them work the cost off.
Tax payer should not be forced to pay for others vandalizing businesses. This is just a stupid Democrat party way of growing burden on the tax payer. .
Put vandals in jail……make them pay for full restitution.
Anything over $500 is a felony.
Mike HALEY,
You make too much sense sir. You are proposing that these leeches on society actually be held responsible for their actions and be severally punished like it will lead to a reduction of this type of thing and improve the quality of life downtown.
Have you no compassion sir?
BTW, I don’t either.
Wrong Solution,
Here! Here!
Amen. Reimbursing for vandalism, tax $ aside, proves they do not want to solve the problem or don’t care. Here’s your thousand dollars, sorry for the inconvenience.
Downtown is slowly drifting back to the 1980s where storefronts were closed and no one wanted to go down there. I had to talk friends into going to City Stage because they were scared to go downtown.
This is a failure of leadership specifically DGI. The city has wasted money on this organization especially considering the former head was using our money and the money of the rich benefactors for “alleged, alleged” personal gain. You know trips to New York.
I spent time downtown my whole life because my grandpa and dad owned a business down there for a combined 60+ years. It’s pathetic that council has allowed the BS to continue. I’m not talking about the new members. I’m talking about the members that have been on council forever and had to know what was going on with DGI. That’s you mayor. If you didn’t know that’s incompetence.
Since the city gives lots of money to DGI they need to demand an overhaul of the entire board. There is no way in my opinion they did not know how the organization was being run. The lack of respect for the small business owner is pathetic. So take your vandalism $ and shove it. Don’t solve the problem. Just try to make it go away.
Wendy I’m 100% with you. Just like the time and expense of installing all the “little no standing or sitting” signs at intersections that panhandlers don’t respect nor do Police enforce
Just hire an armed Korean guard to stand watch. Nobody will mess with them.
Just making a statement. One of the prime reasons to have a government is to police law and order.
GPD under the direction of leadership failed to act in an appropriate & timely manner. The courts should have the vandals pay for all damages. Unfortunately this is not possible with the past leadership due to failures of GPD leadership. Hope the new police chief will enforce laws and the courts will duly punish those who violate same.
Why does the taxpayer have to pay for this? Downtown businesses are vital to the economy but only with good leadership.
Why would tax payers pay for damages caused by a crime? Wrong solution.
Scott, the picture used for this article is perfect as it gives an accurate example of what Greensboro is quickly becoming. Again the ” leadership” throws money at a problem. Sound familiar? Do you feel it in your hip pocket? From DGI , City Council to County Commissioners…throw tax dollars at the issue and not solve the problem. Pitiful. Yes , the picture captures what Greensboro is fast becoming. I don’t think the 10,000 new houses and ” thousands” of new jobs will help other than the continued screwing of tax payers for sprinkles and unicorns and other feel good programs.
Crime is not just a Downtown Greensboro problem; it is a City-Wide Problem! Due to the perpetual lack of effective law enforcement going on for over 10 years now in Greensboro, everybody in this city is suffering! Just another band-aid remedy by paying Downtown business owners to clean up a mess caused by a lack of law enforcement and the failure to effectively penalize all the criminals in Greensboro.
So, the city fines the business owner if they don’t clean up vandalism…and the city has a fund to pay business owners to clean up vandalism. How about just letting businesses run themselves? If I want paint on my doorway, it’s my doorway. If I want to remove it, I will pay to have it done. If the vandal gets caught, great, but I’m not holding my breath on that one despite the tens of thousands of dollars wasted…. I mean spent…. on a proliferation of cameras all over town and the hundreds of thousands spent on the employees monitoring them in the real time crime center or whatever they call it these days.
This is all such a waste of money from every angle.
We agree again!
AMEN Term Limits, what a dumb idea.
How about an emergency fund for homeowners who are hit with extreme tax increases? I wouldn’t be surprised if many are being hit with increases larger than $2000, which of course will be an annual, not a one-time expense. As taxpayers are becoming aware, there is more than one kind of vandal downtown…
Frank,well said! Guilford county residence are being held hostage. If I had to pay city I probably have to sell my home. Downtown Greensboro is a joke!
Hiss, boo City Council and GPD. Taxpayers are not responsible for your mess. Shame on you!
“A broken window or act of vandalism can be the difference between a small business staying open or shutting its doors,……” I won’t repeat the name of the DGI rep who uttered this nonsense. If the cost of a broken window forces you to close your business, then newsflash: You are ALREADY out of business, you just don’t know it yet. Plus, if money is so tight, how can the owner pay for the fix up front, pursue insurance reimbursement and THEN apply to the city? Again, this is for struggling businesses. This slush fund is not going to keep a single business open. But…..this is a great example of a government bureaucrat designed non-solution!
The city seems to just coast and believe everything is ok. The business owners are right: bad parking and not feeling totally safe (includes vandalism, homeless, people creating disturbances, etc) ruin the experience. It’s just easier and more pleasant to go somewhere else. Leave downtown to the club crowd who want to party and drink into the night. Another point: GSO just doesn’t have much of a police presence. Not just downtown, but on busy roads where speeding is rampant. I’ve lived here over 30 years and can’t remember the last time I saw a traffic stop on Bryan, Wendover, Holden, etc
So the taxpayer has to pay for something that is a business expense – insurance?
I lost a car due to an accident. My car wasn’t covered. A tree fell on my uninsured storage building. So can the City cover my losses, please?
You can’t explain this away.
We are preaching to the choir, not the responsible voters.
The DGI initiative reimbursing up to $2,000 a year is helpful, but that really doesn’t go very far for building owners with multiple tenants and storefronts. Ritchy Investments, which owns the building on the corner of McGee and Elm, has already spent over $3,500 since January 2026 on repairs due to vandalism and theft, in additional to supplies. Graffiti removal alone has cost the family over $2000.00. The headaches caused are almost just as damaging as the expense for its removal.
As recent as this week the building was tagged for the 4th time in the last 6 months. This is not sustainable for businesses and property owners.
The city cited more than 22 downtown businesses with code compliance complaints for graffiti removal in November 2025. The majority of those businesses complied and spent thousands of dollars combined “out of their pockets”to clean and repair the vandalism on their properties. Business and property owners should not be carrying the financial burden of ongoing vandalism on their own. We should all be reimbursed for those expenses considering building owners like Sydney Gray continue to operate as slum lords and look to everyone but themselves to be burdened with the expenses associated with being a business owner. Just drive by the corner of Washington/Elm and take a look at the back and the side of the building.
We are all trying to do our part in improving the experience downtown. Our family recently installed an additional 2 cameras along the corner of Elm Street and the McGee parking lot, that alone cost $2000.00. The city owned lots need city owned cameras that are monitored 24/7. Too much of everything is falling on the businesses and property owners.
Downtown business owners, property owners, and residents need to be included at the beginning of these conversations and decisions. Too often, city management is speaking for the people who are actually dealing with these issues every single day. The larger businesses always seem to have a seat at the table, while the smaller businesses — the ones that truly keep downtown going — are left out. They deserve representation, support, and more financial help.
Property Owners pay an additional downtown BID tax that is required for anyone located within the business district. Property owners and businesses should not be left carrying the financial burden when unlawful acts continue happening over and over again downtown. The City of Greensboro and/or Downtown Greensboro Incorporated should be helping support the businesses and property owners who are directly dealing with the costs of vandalism, theft, graffiti removal, and property damage. This should be accomplished through the additional tax we pay in the Downtown Business District.
On a positive note, there has been increased collaboration between business owners, property owners, downtown residents, DGI and city representatives. While we can’t change what has happened in the past, we can continue moving forward by working together, learning from our experiences, and focusing on positive improvements.
Often, the simplest solutions can have the greatest impact, and it’s encouraging to see people coming together to find practical ways to make downtown a better place for everyone.
Kim, as someone whose family owned a building and business downtown for over 60 years I have seen the nonsense you speak of. The city fines the little guy and gives tax credits to the big 4-5 developers. My family’s building was hit with a warning for having boarded up windows at the top of the building after an ordinance was passed (he put glass back in the windows). A former city council person who owned the building across the street “allegedly, allegedly” was the one to lodge the complaint when her building was in disrepair. Then she quickly sold. It’s one big circle jerk with the little guys downtown left holding the bag.
The downtown tax is BS. It was supposed to be for public safety. Maybe the people wearing the polos that Zack hired can start cleaning up graffiti.
Hey Wendy,
Just an FYI…when using the “circle jerk” comment, the little guys downtown should be referred to as the “pivot man”. It’s an old military service saying.
Once again, an example of end around of failed feel good policies. Higher more police let them do their job.
Sounds like a simple solution of those that state these Downtown Business and Property Owners should just file an insurance claim? Guess what, Insurance Companies are also in the business to make a profit! Much like a repetitive flood zone, in a repetitive crime zone insurance rates go up, coverages are reduced, and deductibles rise. Some of these owners may not even be able to obtain insurance? Just another tax on these unfortunate business and property owners due to the poor leadership (past and present) of our City, Mayor, and City Council.
Using an ai pic to push a fear agenda for something that’s not even really a problem here. Has anyone in this city ever been to a real city and seen what an actual graffiti problem looks like.
Here’s a thought, Clean up the streets. Enforce the laws. Stop locking people up just to turn around and let them out on bail to do it again. I blame the city leaders for every bit of this. The mayor, the city council, the city police. This is on all of their heads. And now of course we have a police chief who is questionable at best. Who knows what he’s going to turn his back on. I am so glad I no longer live in the city. It has gone to trash. But then again look who’s running it. The county is going right along with it though thanks to Skip away with your money Alston. He’s doing everything possible to break all the taxpayers and make them become homeless too. Guilford County used to be amazing. Now it’s gone straight up trash.
I had friends to come visit and when they left they told me that they would never ever come back again. They said it was the dirtiest City they have visited in a while. Beggars on every single street corner. Leaving their trash all over the place. Multiple beggars getting up and trying to open your car doors and knocking on your windows. And nobody will do anything about it. They are not putting a stop to it. Guilford County and the City of Greensboro is no longer safe. It is no longer beautiful. And that’s a shame. It used to be one of the best.